Error detection and recovery in dialysis nursing

William E. Wilkinson, Lee A. Cauble, Vimla Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Our aim for this study was to evaluate dialysis nurses' ability to detect and recover from nursing errors. Methods: Two clinical cases with a total of 12 embedded errors were constructed. The errors were based on real events but were modified for the experimental design by an expert dialysis nurse. A total of 31 registered nurse subjects "talked aloud" as they read through the 2 cases and answered a set of predesigned knowledge-based and procedural questions. The talk-aloud sessions were recorded and transcribed for analysis of errors detected and recovered. Results: Performance on procedurally based error detection and recovery was significantly higher as a function of expertise (P < 0.05), where more-experienced nurses performed better than the less-experienced nurses in detecting and recovering procedurally based errors. However, no differences were found for knowledge-based errors. Conclusions: Expert nurses develop a special ability to detect and recover from nursing errors, but the nature of these errors depends on the nature of the task. Dialysis nursing requires more knowledge of procedures rather than conceptual knowledge in their routine work, and thus, the nurses develop better procedurally based skills. This raises concern about nurses making knowledge-based or conceptual errors, which, if made, are not detected or corrected. The need for understanding conceptual knowledge underlying procedures and for training in error detection and correction strategies is discussed in the context of nursing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)213-223
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Patient Safety
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2011

Fingerprint

Dialysis
Nursing
Nurses
Research Design

Keywords

  • accidents
  • clinical arenas
  • communication
  • dialysis nursing
  • education and certification
  • error analysis
  • error epidemiology
  • health policy
  • human performance issues
  • IT and safety
  • medical error
  • medication safety
  • nursing error
  • patient safety
  • quality
  • system/organizational failure
  • systems safety for medical errors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Error detection and recovery in dialysis nursing. / Wilkinson, William E.; Cauble, Lee A.; Patel, Vimla.

In: Journal of Patient Safety, Vol. 7, No. 4, 01.12.2011, p. 213-223.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Wilkinson, William E. ; Cauble, Lee A. ; Patel, Vimla. / Error detection and recovery in dialysis nursing. In: Journal of Patient Safety. 2011 ; Vol. 7, No. 4. pp. 213-223.
@article{1bb119bb902243dba3db9cb14dbff2de,
title = "Error detection and recovery in dialysis nursing",
abstract = "Objectives: Our aim for this study was to evaluate dialysis nurses' ability to detect and recover from nursing errors. Methods: Two clinical cases with a total of 12 embedded errors were constructed. The errors were based on real events but were modified for the experimental design by an expert dialysis nurse. A total of 31 registered nurse subjects {"}talked aloud{"} as they read through the 2 cases and answered a set of predesigned knowledge-based and procedural questions. The talk-aloud sessions were recorded and transcribed for analysis of errors detected and recovered. Results: Performance on procedurally based error detection and recovery was significantly higher as a function of expertise (P < 0.05), where more-experienced nurses performed better than the less-experienced nurses in detecting and recovering procedurally based errors. However, no differences were found for knowledge-based errors. Conclusions: Expert nurses develop a special ability to detect and recover from nursing errors, but the nature of these errors depends on the nature of the task. Dialysis nursing requires more knowledge of procedures rather than conceptual knowledge in their routine work, and thus, the nurses develop better procedurally based skills. This raises concern about nurses making knowledge-based or conceptual errors, which, if made, are not detected or corrected. The need for understanding conceptual knowledge underlying procedures and for training in error detection and correction strategies is discussed in the context of nursing.",
keywords = "accidents, clinical arenas, communication, dialysis nursing, education and certification, error analysis, error epidemiology, health policy, human performance issues, IT and safety, medical error, medication safety, nursing error, patient safety, quality, system/organizational failure, systems safety for medical errors",
author = "Wilkinson, {William E.} and Cauble, {Lee A.} and Vimla Patel",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182388d20",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "213--223",
journal = "Journal of Patient Safety",
issn = "1549-8417",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Error detection and recovery in dialysis nursing

AU - Wilkinson, William E.

AU - Cauble, Lee A.

AU - Patel, Vimla

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - Objectives: Our aim for this study was to evaluate dialysis nurses' ability to detect and recover from nursing errors. Methods: Two clinical cases with a total of 12 embedded errors were constructed. The errors were based on real events but were modified for the experimental design by an expert dialysis nurse. A total of 31 registered nurse subjects "talked aloud" as they read through the 2 cases and answered a set of predesigned knowledge-based and procedural questions. The talk-aloud sessions were recorded and transcribed for analysis of errors detected and recovered. Results: Performance on procedurally based error detection and recovery was significantly higher as a function of expertise (P < 0.05), where more-experienced nurses performed better than the less-experienced nurses in detecting and recovering procedurally based errors. However, no differences were found for knowledge-based errors. Conclusions: Expert nurses develop a special ability to detect and recover from nursing errors, but the nature of these errors depends on the nature of the task. Dialysis nursing requires more knowledge of procedures rather than conceptual knowledge in their routine work, and thus, the nurses develop better procedurally based skills. This raises concern about nurses making knowledge-based or conceptual errors, which, if made, are not detected or corrected. The need for understanding conceptual knowledge underlying procedures and for training in error detection and correction strategies is discussed in the context of nursing.

AB - Objectives: Our aim for this study was to evaluate dialysis nurses' ability to detect and recover from nursing errors. Methods: Two clinical cases with a total of 12 embedded errors were constructed. The errors were based on real events but were modified for the experimental design by an expert dialysis nurse. A total of 31 registered nurse subjects "talked aloud" as they read through the 2 cases and answered a set of predesigned knowledge-based and procedural questions. The talk-aloud sessions were recorded and transcribed for analysis of errors detected and recovered. Results: Performance on procedurally based error detection and recovery was significantly higher as a function of expertise (P < 0.05), where more-experienced nurses performed better than the less-experienced nurses in detecting and recovering procedurally based errors. However, no differences were found for knowledge-based errors. Conclusions: Expert nurses develop a special ability to detect and recover from nursing errors, but the nature of these errors depends on the nature of the task. Dialysis nursing requires more knowledge of procedures rather than conceptual knowledge in their routine work, and thus, the nurses develop better procedurally based skills. This raises concern about nurses making knowledge-based or conceptual errors, which, if made, are not detected or corrected. The need for understanding conceptual knowledge underlying procedures and for training in error detection and correction strategies is discussed in the context of nursing.

KW - accidents

KW - clinical arenas

KW - communication

KW - dialysis nursing

KW - education and certification

KW - error analysis

KW - error epidemiology

KW - health policy

KW - human performance issues

KW - IT and safety

KW - medical error

KW - medication safety

KW - nursing error

KW - patient safety

KW - quality

KW - system/organizational failure

KW - systems safety for medical errors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81855201756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=81855201756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182388d20

DO - 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182388d20

M3 - Review article

VL - 7

SP - 213

EP - 223

JO - Journal of Patient Safety

JF - Journal of Patient Safety

SN - 1549-8417

IS - 4

ER -