Equivocation

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on one of the common fallacies in Western philosophy called ‘equivocation’. Patrick Hurley writes that the fallacy of equivocation “occurs when the conclusion of an argument depends on the fact that the word or phrase is used, either explicitly or implicitly, in two different senses in the argument”. This fallacy happens often within discussions and debates concerning the alleged tension between science and religion. The best way to avoid this fallacy is to take care to ensure that key terms, especially ones with multiple meanings, in our arguments are being used consistently; that is, that the words retain the same meaning throughout the argument. It is also important, for the sake of lucidity, to ensure that it is clear which meaning we intend to be using throughout our argument.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationBad Arguments
Subtitle of host publication50 Common Fallacies and How to Avoid Them
PublisherWiley
Pages261-265
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9781119165811
ISBN (Print)9781119165781
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Equivocation
Fallacies
Religion
Western philosophy
Lucidity

Keywords

  • Argument
  • Equivocation fallacy
  • Patrick Hurley
  • Western philosophy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Manninen, B. (2017). Equivocation. In Bad Arguments: 50 Common Fallacies and How to Avoid Them (pp. 261-265). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119165811.ch57

Equivocation. / Manninen, Bertha.

Bad Arguments: 50 Common Fallacies and How to Avoid Them. Wiley, 2017. p. 261-265.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Manninen, B 2017, Equivocation. in Bad Arguments: 50 Common Fallacies and How to Avoid Them. Wiley, pp. 261-265. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119165811.ch57
Manninen B. Equivocation. In Bad Arguments: 50 Common Fallacies and How to Avoid Them. Wiley. 2017. p. 261-265 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119165811.ch57
Manninen, Bertha. / Equivocation. Bad Arguments: 50 Common Fallacies and How to Avoid Them. Wiley, 2017. pp. 261-265
@inbook{2b41bcabffbf4968ad5b78170ce2e477,
title = "Equivocation",
abstract = "This chapter focuses on one of the common fallacies in Western philosophy called ‘equivocation’. Patrick Hurley writes that the fallacy of equivocation “occurs when the conclusion of an argument depends on the fact that the word or phrase is used, either explicitly or implicitly, in two different senses in the argument”. This fallacy happens often within discussions and debates concerning the alleged tension between science and religion. The best way to avoid this fallacy is to take care to ensure that key terms, especially ones with multiple meanings, in our arguments are being used consistently; that is, that the words retain the same meaning throughout the argument. It is also important, for the sake of lucidity, to ensure that it is clear which meaning we intend to be using throughout our argument.",
keywords = "Argument, Equivocation fallacy, Patrick Hurley, Western philosophy",
author = "Bertha Manninen",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/9781119165811.ch57",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781119165781",
pages = "261--265",
booktitle = "Bad Arguments",
publisher = "Wiley",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Equivocation

AU - Manninen, Bertha

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - This chapter focuses on one of the common fallacies in Western philosophy called ‘equivocation’. Patrick Hurley writes that the fallacy of equivocation “occurs when the conclusion of an argument depends on the fact that the word or phrase is used, either explicitly or implicitly, in two different senses in the argument”. This fallacy happens often within discussions and debates concerning the alleged tension between science and religion. The best way to avoid this fallacy is to take care to ensure that key terms, especially ones with multiple meanings, in our arguments are being used consistently; that is, that the words retain the same meaning throughout the argument. It is also important, for the sake of lucidity, to ensure that it is clear which meaning we intend to be using throughout our argument.

AB - This chapter focuses on one of the common fallacies in Western philosophy called ‘equivocation’. Patrick Hurley writes that the fallacy of equivocation “occurs when the conclusion of an argument depends on the fact that the word or phrase is used, either explicitly or implicitly, in two different senses in the argument”. This fallacy happens often within discussions and debates concerning the alleged tension between science and religion. The best way to avoid this fallacy is to take care to ensure that key terms, especially ones with multiple meanings, in our arguments are being used consistently; that is, that the words retain the same meaning throughout the argument. It is also important, for the sake of lucidity, to ensure that it is clear which meaning we intend to be using throughout our argument.

KW - Argument

KW - Equivocation fallacy

KW - Patrick Hurley

KW - Western philosophy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060468622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060468622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/9781119165811.ch57

DO - 10.1002/9781119165811.ch57

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85060468622

SN - 9781119165781

SP - 261

EP - 265

BT - Bad Arguments

PB - Wiley

ER -