Equity in urban water governance through participatory, place-based approaches

Kelli Larson, Denise Lach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While multiple reasons exist for involving citizens in local water governance, decentralization of decisions is generally thought to result in both effective and equitable governance regimes. To assess these claims, we examined the ability of a watershed council in metropolitan Portland, Oregon, to engage a wide variety of residents in environmental protection and decision-making. Through a survey and interviews, we found that participants in the case study watershed council over-represented urban residents in downstream Portland, as well as those who live near water in flood-prone areas. The council also over-represented newcomers to Oregon and residents with relatively high educational levels, in addition to classic pro-environmental (biocentric) worldviews and liberal political interests. Overall, watershed council participants appear to bring a bureaucratic capacity and liberal ideology to the council that does not reflect the full array of residents in the watershed. Therefore, rather than fostering widespread engagement among diverse stakeholders, the council reproduces the existing power structures in the community by providing another opportunity for citizens with access to professional and political venues to participate in local water resource governance. Residents with less human capital and with "politically incorrect" perspectives are, thus, less likely to be actively engaged in watershed planning and other projects, removing their voices, voluntary actions, and, for the most part, their geographic locales from decentralized, community-based governance. The lack of socio-spatial equity in participation has implications not only for democratic decision- making; it also hinders the effectiveness of community-based efforts aimed at voluntary watershed-wide restoration and enhancement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)407-430
Number of pages24
JournalNatural Resources Journal
Volume50
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

equity
watershed
resident
governance
water
citizen
community
decision making
political interest
worldview
environmental protection
restoration
human capital
decentralization
natural disaster
ideology
stakeholder
urban water
water resource
planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Equity in urban water governance through participatory, place-based approaches. / Larson, Kelli; Lach, Denise.

In: Natural Resources Journal, Vol. 50, No. 2, 2010, p. 407-430.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4ec706b8408348efb642feadd5b3a8ce,
title = "Equity in urban water governance through participatory, place-based approaches",
abstract = "While multiple reasons exist for involving citizens in local water governance, decentralization of decisions is generally thought to result in both effective and equitable governance regimes. To assess these claims, we examined the ability of a watershed council in metropolitan Portland, Oregon, to engage a wide variety of residents in environmental protection and decision-making. Through a survey and interviews, we found that participants in the case study watershed council over-represented urban residents in downstream Portland, as well as those who live near water in flood-prone areas. The council also over-represented newcomers to Oregon and residents with relatively high educational levels, in addition to classic pro-environmental (biocentric) worldviews and liberal political interests. Overall, watershed council participants appear to bring a bureaucratic capacity and liberal ideology to the council that does not reflect the full array of residents in the watershed. Therefore, rather than fostering widespread engagement among diverse stakeholders, the council reproduces the existing power structures in the community by providing another opportunity for citizens with access to professional and political venues to participate in local water resource governance. Residents with less human capital and with {"}politically incorrect{"} perspectives are, thus, less likely to be actively engaged in watershed planning and other projects, removing their voices, voluntary actions, and, for the most part, their geographic locales from decentralized, community-based governance. The lack of socio-spatial equity in participation has implications not only for democratic decision- making; it also hinders the effectiveness of community-based efforts aimed at voluntary watershed-wide restoration and enhancement.",
author = "Kelli Larson and Denise Lach",
year = "2010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "407--430",
journal = "Natural Resources Journal",
issn = "0028-0739",
publisher = "University of New Mexico",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Equity in urban water governance through participatory, place-based approaches

AU - Larson, Kelli

AU - Lach, Denise

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - While multiple reasons exist for involving citizens in local water governance, decentralization of decisions is generally thought to result in both effective and equitable governance regimes. To assess these claims, we examined the ability of a watershed council in metropolitan Portland, Oregon, to engage a wide variety of residents in environmental protection and decision-making. Through a survey and interviews, we found that participants in the case study watershed council over-represented urban residents in downstream Portland, as well as those who live near water in flood-prone areas. The council also over-represented newcomers to Oregon and residents with relatively high educational levels, in addition to classic pro-environmental (biocentric) worldviews and liberal political interests. Overall, watershed council participants appear to bring a bureaucratic capacity and liberal ideology to the council that does not reflect the full array of residents in the watershed. Therefore, rather than fostering widespread engagement among diverse stakeholders, the council reproduces the existing power structures in the community by providing another opportunity for citizens with access to professional and political venues to participate in local water resource governance. Residents with less human capital and with "politically incorrect" perspectives are, thus, less likely to be actively engaged in watershed planning and other projects, removing their voices, voluntary actions, and, for the most part, their geographic locales from decentralized, community-based governance. The lack of socio-spatial equity in participation has implications not only for democratic decision- making; it also hinders the effectiveness of community-based efforts aimed at voluntary watershed-wide restoration and enhancement.

AB - While multiple reasons exist for involving citizens in local water governance, decentralization of decisions is generally thought to result in both effective and equitable governance regimes. To assess these claims, we examined the ability of a watershed council in metropolitan Portland, Oregon, to engage a wide variety of residents in environmental protection and decision-making. Through a survey and interviews, we found that participants in the case study watershed council over-represented urban residents in downstream Portland, as well as those who live near water in flood-prone areas. The council also over-represented newcomers to Oregon and residents with relatively high educational levels, in addition to classic pro-environmental (biocentric) worldviews and liberal political interests. Overall, watershed council participants appear to bring a bureaucratic capacity and liberal ideology to the council that does not reflect the full array of residents in the watershed. Therefore, rather than fostering widespread engagement among diverse stakeholders, the council reproduces the existing power structures in the community by providing another opportunity for citizens with access to professional and political venues to participate in local water resource governance. Residents with less human capital and with "politically incorrect" perspectives are, thus, less likely to be actively engaged in watershed planning and other projects, removing their voices, voluntary actions, and, for the most part, their geographic locales from decentralized, community-based governance. The lack of socio-spatial equity in participation has implications not only for democratic decision- making; it also hinders the effectiveness of community-based efforts aimed at voluntary watershed-wide restoration and enhancement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856179984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856179984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84856179984

VL - 50

SP - 407

EP - 430

JO - Natural Resources Journal

JF - Natural Resources Journal

SN - 0028-0739

IS - 2

ER -