Equifinality and Desistance: Which Pathways to Desistance Are the Most Traveled in Young Adulthood?

Gary Sweeten, Natasha Khade

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The desistance literature identifies many competing explanations for desistance. Equifinality, Cicchetti and Rogosch (Dev Psychopathol 8:597–600, 1996), refers to the idea that a diversity of pathways can lead to the same end result. Embracing this perspective, we shift our focus from identifying effects of causes to identifying the causes of an effect, Sampson et al. (Criminol Public Policy 12:587–616, 2013): desistance. That is, among individuals who have desisted from crime, what proportion have experienced each of the proposed explanations of desistance? Are these proportions any different from non-desisters or other offending groups? In this way, we provide evidence for the relative importance of competing explanations for desistance. Methods: Using Pathways to Desistance, we estimate group-based trajectory models of offending. We use this model to identify desisters and persisters. We then compare these two groups on theoretically motivated constructs. Results: We find that psychosocial development, associations with deviant peers, and the social rewards of crime change more rapidly among desisters than persisters. Many desistance processes are present among persisting groups, but at a slower rate of change compared to desisters. Conclusions: Embracing the equifinality of desistance would open up new methodological approaches and new ways of organizing the literature, and would have important implications for theoretical development and policy applications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)369-394
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology
Volume4
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Crime
adulthood
Policy Making
Public Policy
Reward
Group
offense
psychosocial development
cause
reward
public policy
evidence
literature

Keywords

  • Desistance
  • Equifinality
  • Persistence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Equifinality and Desistance : Which Pathways to Desistance Are the Most Traveled in Young Adulthood? / Sweeten, Gary; Khade, Natasha.

In: Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, Vol. 4, No. 4, 01.12.2018, p. 369-394.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{148b96a436fd4c80a609888cd8e0283a,
title = "Equifinality and Desistance: Which Pathways to Desistance Are the Most Traveled in Young Adulthood?",
abstract = "Purpose: The desistance literature identifies many competing explanations for desistance. Equifinality, Cicchetti and Rogosch (Dev Psychopathol 8:597–600, 1996), refers to the idea that a diversity of pathways can lead to the same end result. Embracing this perspective, we shift our focus from identifying effects of causes to identifying the causes of an effect, Sampson et al. (Criminol Public Policy 12:587–616, 2013): desistance. That is, among individuals who have desisted from crime, what proportion have experienced each of the proposed explanations of desistance? Are these proportions any different from non-desisters or other offending groups? In this way, we provide evidence for the relative importance of competing explanations for desistance. Methods: Using Pathways to Desistance, we estimate group-based trajectory models of offending. We use this model to identify desisters and persisters. We then compare these two groups on theoretically motivated constructs. Results: We find that psychosocial development, associations with deviant peers, and the social rewards of crime change more rapidly among desisters than persisters. Many desistance processes are present among persisting groups, but at a slower rate of change compared to desisters. Conclusions: Embracing the equifinality of desistance would open up new methodological approaches and new ways of organizing the literature, and would have important implications for theoretical development and policy applications.",
keywords = "Desistance, Equifinality, Persistence",
author = "Gary Sweeten and Natasha Khade",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s40865-018-0092-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "369--394",
journal = "Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology",
issn = "2199-4641",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Equifinality and Desistance

T2 - Which Pathways to Desistance Are the Most Traveled in Young Adulthood?

AU - Sweeten, Gary

AU - Khade, Natasha

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Purpose: The desistance literature identifies many competing explanations for desistance. Equifinality, Cicchetti and Rogosch (Dev Psychopathol 8:597–600, 1996), refers to the idea that a diversity of pathways can lead to the same end result. Embracing this perspective, we shift our focus from identifying effects of causes to identifying the causes of an effect, Sampson et al. (Criminol Public Policy 12:587–616, 2013): desistance. That is, among individuals who have desisted from crime, what proportion have experienced each of the proposed explanations of desistance? Are these proportions any different from non-desisters or other offending groups? In this way, we provide evidence for the relative importance of competing explanations for desistance. Methods: Using Pathways to Desistance, we estimate group-based trajectory models of offending. We use this model to identify desisters and persisters. We then compare these two groups on theoretically motivated constructs. Results: We find that psychosocial development, associations with deviant peers, and the social rewards of crime change more rapidly among desisters than persisters. Many desistance processes are present among persisting groups, but at a slower rate of change compared to desisters. Conclusions: Embracing the equifinality of desistance would open up new methodological approaches and new ways of organizing the literature, and would have important implications for theoretical development and policy applications.

AB - Purpose: The desistance literature identifies many competing explanations for desistance. Equifinality, Cicchetti and Rogosch (Dev Psychopathol 8:597–600, 1996), refers to the idea that a diversity of pathways can lead to the same end result. Embracing this perspective, we shift our focus from identifying effects of causes to identifying the causes of an effect, Sampson et al. (Criminol Public Policy 12:587–616, 2013): desistance. That is, among individuals who have desisted from crime, what proportion have experienced each of the proposed explanations of desistance? Are these proportions any different from non-desisters or other offending groups? In this way, we provide evidence for the relative importance of competing explanations for desistance. Methods: Using Pathways to Desistance, we estimate group-based trajectory models of offending. We use this model to identify desisters and persisters. We then compare these two groups on theoretically motivated constructs. Results: We find that psychosocial development, associations with deviant peers, and the social rewards of crime change more rapidly among desisters than persisters. Many desistance processes are present among persisting groups, but at a slower rate of change compared to desisters. Conclusions: Embracing the equifinality of desistance would open up new methodological approaches and new ways of organizing the literature, and would have important implications for theoretical development and policy applications.

KW - Desistance

KW - Equifinality

KW - Persistence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070456351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070456351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40865-018-0092-y

DO - 10.1007/s40865-018-0092-y

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85070456351

VL - 4

SP - 369

EP - 394

JO - Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology

JF - Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology

SN - 2199-4641

IS - 4

ER -