Epistemological pluralism: Reorganizing interdisciplinary research

Thaddeus Miller, Timothy D. Baird, Caitlin M. Littlefield, Gary Kofinas, F. Stuart Chapin, Charles Redman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

227 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite progress in interdisciplinary research, difficulties remain. In this paper, we argue that scholars, educators, and practitioners need to critically rethink the ways in which interdisciplinary research and training are conducted. We present epistemological pluralism as an approach for conducting innovative, collaborative research and study. Epistemological pluralism recognizes that, in any given research context, there may be several valuable ways of knowing, and that accommodating this plurality can lead to more successful integrated study. This approach is particularly useful in the study and management of social-ecological systems. Through resilience theory's adaptive cycle, we demonstrate how a focus on epistemological pluralism can facilitate the reorganization of interdisciplinary research and avoid the build-up of significant, but insufficiently integrative, disciplinary-dominated research. Finally, using two case studies - urban ecology and social-ecological research in Alaska - we highlight how interdisciplinary work is impeded when divergent epistemologies are not recognized and valued, and that by incorporating a pluralistic framework, these issues can be better explored, resulting in more integrated understanding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number46
JournalEcology and Society
Volume13
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

interdisciplinary research
urban ecology

Keywords

  • Adaptive cycle
  • Epistemology
  • Interdisciplinary

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Miller, T., Baird, T. D., Littlefield, C. M., Kofinas, G., Chapin, F. S., & Redman, C. (2008). Epistemological pluralism: Reorganizing interdisciplinary research. Ecology and Society, 13(2), [46].

Epistemological pluralism : Reorganizing interdisciplinary research. / Miller, Thaddeus; Baird, Timothy D.; Littlefield, Caitlin M.; Kofinas, Gary; Chapin, F. Stuart; Redman, Charles.

In: Ecology and Society, Vol. 13, No. 2, 46, 2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miller, T, Baird, TD, Littlefield, CM, Kofinas, G, Chapin, FS & Redman, C 2008, 'Epistemological pluralism: Reorganizing interdisciplinary research', Ecology and Society, vol. 13, no. 2, 46.
Miller T, Baird TD, Littlefield CM, Kofinas G, Chapin FS, Redman C. Epistemological pluralism: Reorganizing interdisciplinary research. Ecology and Society. 2008;13(2). 46.
Miller, Thaddeus ; Baird, Timothy D. ; Littlefield, Caitlin M. ; Kofinas, Gary ; Chapin, F. Stuart ; Redman, Charles. / Epistemological pluralism : Reorganizing interdisciplinary research. In: Ecology and Society. 2008 ; Vol. 13, No. 2.
@article{ac6bbe5f9954470ea9da9118e77ad28f,
title = "Epistemological pluralism: Reorganizing interdisciplinary research",
abstract = "Despite progress in interdisciplinary research, difficulties remain. In this paper, we argue that scholars, educators, and practitioners need to critically rethink the ways in which interdisciplinary research and training are conducted. We present epistemological pluralism as an approach for conducting innovative, collaborative research and study. Epistemological pluralism recognizes that, in any given research context, there may be several valuable ways of knowing, and that accommodating this plurality can lead to more successful integrated study. This approach is particularly useful in the study and management of social-ecological systems. Through resilience theory's adaptive cycle, we demonstrate how a focus on epistemological pluralism can facilitate the reorganization of interdisciplinary research and avoid the build-up of significant, but insufficiently integrative, disciplinary-dominated research. Finally, using two case studies - urban ecology and social-ecological research in Alaska - we highlight how interdisciplinary work is impeded when divergent epistemologies are not recognized and valued, and that by incorporating a pluralistic framework, these issues can be better explored, resulting in more integrated understanding.",
keywords = "Adaptive cycle, Epistemology, Interdisciplinary",
author = "Thaddeus Miller and Baird, {Timothy D.} and Littlefield, {Caitlin M.} and Gary Kofinas and Chapin, {F. Stuart} and Charles Redman",
year = "2008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "Ecology and Society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Epistemological pluralism

T2 - Reorganizing interdisciplinary research

AU - Miller, Thaddeus

AU - Baird, Timothy D.

AU - Littlefield, Caitlin M.

AU - Kofinas, Gary

AU - Chapin, F. Stuart

AU - Redman, Charles

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Despite progress in interdisciplinary research, difficulties remain. In this paper, we argue that scholars, educators, and practitioners need to critically rethink the ways in which interdisciplinary research and training are conducted. We present epistemological pluralism as an approach for conducting innovative, collaborative research and study. Epistemological pluralism recognizes that, in any given research context, there may be several valuable ways of knowing, and that accommodating this plurality can lead to more successful integrated study. This approach is particularly useful in the study and management of social-ecological systems. Through resilience theory's adaptive cycle, we demonstrate how a focus on epistemological pluralism can facilitate the reorganization of interdisciplinary research and avoid the build-up of significant, but insufficiently integrative, disciplinary-dominated research. Finally, using two case studies - urban ecology and social-ecological research in Alaska - we highlight how interdisciplinary work is impeded when divergent epistemologies are not recognized and valued, and that by incorporating a pluralistic framework, these issues can be better explored, resulting in more integrated understanding.

AB - Despite progress in interdisciplinary research, difficulties remain. In this paper, we argue that scholars, educators, and practitioners need to critically rethink the ways in which interdisciplinary research and training are conducted. We present epistemological pluralism as an approach for conducting innovative, collaborative research and study. Epistemological pluralism recognizes that, in any given research context, there may be several valuable ways of knowing, and that accommodating this plurality can lead to more successful integrated study. This approach is particularly useful in the study and management of social-ecological systems. Through resilience theory's adaptive cycle, we demonstrate how a focus on epistemological pluralism can facilitate the reorganization of interdisciplinary research and avoid the build-up of significant, but insufficiently integrative, disciplinary-dominated research. Finally, using two case studies - urban ecology and social-ecological research in Alaska - we highlight how interdisciplinary work is impeded when divergent epistemologies are not recognized and valued, and that by incorporating a pluralistic framework, these issues can be better explored, resulting in more integrated understanding.

KW - Adaptive cycle

KW - Epistemology

KW - Interdisciplinary

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58749083597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58749083597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:58749083597

VL - 13

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 2

M1 - 46

ER -