Environmental and economic sustainability of ion exchange drinking water treatment for organics removal

Adib Amini, Youngwoon Kim, Jie Zhang, Treavor Boyer, Qiong Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Water treatment infrastructure faces numerous operational and financial challenges in most regions of the world. Ion exchange is a water treatment technology that can be used to remove various contaminants in drinking water and has shown increased adoption in recent years due to its operational advantages; however, limited research has been conducted on the environmental and economic sustainability of ion exchange systems. This study utilizes life cycle assessment and cost analysis to holistically evaluate environmental and economic impacts of ion exchange technology that is used for reduction of disinfection by-products via organics removal in eight drinking water treatment plants in Florida. A functional unit accounting for both water quantity and quality was used and showed to have a significant effect on the evaluation results. Impact assessment results show that the construction phase has negligible environmental impact in comparison to the operation phase. Systems that use fixed bed reactors with conventional resin were compared with systems using completely mixed flow reactors with magnetic ion exchange resin. Fixed bed systems evaluated have higher salt usage and brine waste production, but use less electricity, resin, and require less transport of materials. This tradeoff causes fixed bed systems to have a higher environmental impact in categories of eutrophication, carcinogenics, non-carcinogenics, and ecotoxicity but lower impact in other categories. Furthermore, it causes fixed bed systems to have a lower operation cost compared with completely mixed systems. Results also show that both environmental impacts and operation costs per functional unit decrease with scale, similar to economies of scale effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)413-421
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume104
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Water treatment
Potable water
Environmental impact
Sustainable development
ion exchange
Ion exchange
environmental impact
sustainability
resin
Economics
Resins
economics
Costs
water treatment
Eutrophication
Ion exchange resins
Water treatment plants
Disinfection
Byproducts
economy of scale

Keywords

  • Drinking water
  • Ion exchange
  • Life cycle assessment
  • Operation cost
  • Sustainability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Environmental and economic sustainability of ion exchange drinking water treatment for organics removal. / Amini, Adib; Kim, Youngwoon; Zhang, Jie; Boyer, Treavor; Zhang, Qiong.

In: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 104, 01.10.2015, p. 413-421.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e0d96a01044646d1b454e6ad992111e9,
title = "Environmental and economic sustainability of ion exchange drinking water treatment for organics removal",
abstract = "Water treatment infrastructure faces numerous operational and financial challenges in most regions of the world. Ion exchange is a water treatment technology that can be used to remove various contaminants in drinking water and has shown increased adoption in recent years due to its operational advantages; however, limited research has been conducted on the environmental and economic sustainability of ion exchange systems. This study utilizes life cycle assessment and cost analysis to holistically evaluate environmental and economic impacts of ion exchange technology that is used for reduction of disinfection by-products via organics removal in eight drinking water treatment plants in Florida. A functional unit accounting for both water quantity and quality was used and showed to have a significant effect on the evaluation results. Impact assessment results show that the construction phase has negligible environmental impact in comparison to the operation phase. Systems that use fixed bed reactors with conventional resin were compared with systems using completely mixed flow reactors with magnetic ion exchange resin. Fixed bed systems evaluated have higher salt usage and brine waste production, but use less electricity, resin, and require less transport of materials. This tradeoff causes fixed bed systems to have a higher environmental impact in categories of eutrophication, carcinogenics, non-carcinogenics, and ecotoxicity but lower impact in other categories. Furthermore, it causes fixed bed systems to have a lower operation cost compared with completely mixed systems. Results also show that both environmental impacts and operation costs per functional unit decrease with scale, similar to economies of scale effects.",
keywords = "Drinking water, Ion exchange, Life cycle assessment, Operation cost, Sustainability",
author = "Adib Amini and Youngwoon Kim and Jie Zhang and Treavor Boyer and Qiong Zhang",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.056",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "104",
pages = "413--421",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Environmental and economic sustainability of ion exchange drinking water treatment for organics removal

AU - Amini, Adib

AU - Kim, Youngwoon

AU - Zhang, Jie

AU - Boyer, Treavor

AU - Zhang, Qiong

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Water treatment infrastructure faces numerous operational and financial challenges in most regions of the world. Ion exchange is a water treatment technology that can be used to remove various contaminants in drinking water and has shown increased adoption in recent years due to its operational advantages; however, limited research has been conducted on the environmental and economic sustainability of ion exchange systems. This study utilizes life cycle assessment and cost analysis to holistically evaluate environmental and economic impacts of ion exchange technology that is used for reduction of disinfection by-products via organics removal in eight drinking water treatment plants in Florida. A functional unit accounting for both water quantity and quality was used and showed to have a significant effect on the evaluation results. Impact assessment results show that the construction phase has negligible environmental impact in comparison to the operation phase. Systems that use fixed bed reactors with conventional resin were compared with systems using completely mixed flow reactors with magnetic ion exchange resin. Fixed bed systems evaluated have higher salt usage and brine waste production, but use less electricity, resin, and require less transport of materials. This tradeoff causes fixed bed systems to have a higher environmental impact in categories of eutrophication, carcinogenics, non-carcinogenics, and ecotoxicity but lower impact in other categories. Furthermore, it causes fixed bed systems to have a lower operation cost compared with completely mixed systems. Results also show that both environmental impacts and operation costs per functional unit decrease with scale, similar to economies of scale effects.

AB - Water treatment infrastructure faces numerous operational and financial challenges in most regions of the world. Ion exchange is a water treatment technology that can be used to remove various contaminants in drinking water and has shown increased adoption in recent years due to its operational advantages; however, limited research has been conducted on the environmental and economic sustainability of ion exchange systems. This study utilizes life cycle assessment and cost analysis to holistically evaluate environmental and economic impacts of ion exchange technology that is used for reduction of disinfection by-products via organics removal in eight drinking water treatment plants in Florida. A functional unit accounting for both water quantity and quality was used and showed to have a significant effect on the evaluation results. Impact assessment results show that the construction phase has negligible environmental impact in comparison to the operation phase. Systems that use fixed bed reactors with conventional resin were compared with systems using completely mixed flow reactors with magnetic ion exchange resin. Fixed bed systems evaluated have higher salt usage and brine waste production, but use less electricity, resin, and require less transport of materials. This tradeoff causes fixed bed systems to have a higher environmental impact in categories of eutrophication, carcinogenics, non-carcinogenics, and ecotoxicity but lower impact in other categories. Furthermore, it causes fixed bed systems to have a lower operation cost compared with completely mixed systems. Results also show that both environmental impacts and operation costs per functional unit decrease with scale, similar to economies of scale effects.

KW - Drinking water

KW - Ion exchange

KW - Life cycle assessment

KW - Operation cost

KW - Sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931573365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84931573365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.056

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.056

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84931573365

VL - 104

SP - 413

EP - 421

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

ER -