Entering the social experiment

A case for the informed consent of graduate engineering students

Erik Fisher, Michael Lightner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Taking up the notion of engineering as social experimentation, this paper argues that engineering research laboratory directors have a responsibility to inform graduate engineering students who participate in their research projects of the potential broader social dimensions of those projects. Informing engineers-in-the-making of the broader social dimensions of the research they are learning to conduct would help ensure their future capacity to act as ethically responsible social experimenters. The paper also argues that graduate engineers have a right to be informed participants in activities that may have broader social dimensions than are recognized by formal research evaluation or educational processes. The process of obtaining the informed consent of graduate engineering students, if implemented effectively, would thus help ensure both their capacity to act as moral agents and their own moral integrity. Since the eventual outcomes of research can be uncertain, complex, and contested, most traditional institutional frameworks-such as principle-based codes of conduct and risk-benefit frameworks-provide an insufficient basis to inform engineers and citizens. Rather, we recommend an ongoing discursive process that explores a number of different actors, contexts, and scenarios, and that evolves with the social context of the engineering research in question. While this may seem burdensome to the engineering research process, it can be integrated directly into the group research meetings and mentorship activities that typically already go on. Moreover, it can actually be seen to benefit engineering practices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-300
Number of pages18
JournalSocial Epistemology
Volume23
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2009

Fingerprint

graduate
engineering
experiment
capacity to act
student
engineer
evaluation research
research process
Informed Consent
Experiment
integrity
director
research project
scenario
citizen
responsibility
learning
Engineers
Group

Keywords

  • Education
  • Engineering Ethics
  • Governance
  • Informed Consent
  • Nanotechnology
  • Social Experimentation
  • Synthetic Biology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Philosophy

Cite this

Entering the social experiment : A case for the informed consent of graduate engineering students. / Fisher, Erik; Lightner, Michael.

In: Social Epistemology, Vol. 23, No. 3-4, 07.2009, p. 283-300.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c898cc77db874daa82206580c8097b3e,
title = "Entering the social experiment: A case for the informed consent of graduate engineering students",
abstract = "Taking up the notion of engineering as social experimentation, this paper argues that engineering research laboratory directors have a responsibility to inform graduate engineering students who participate in their research projects of the potential broader social dimensions of those projects. Informing engineers-in-the-making of the broader social dimensions of the research they are learning to conduct would help ensure their future capacity to act as ethically responsible social experimenters. The paper also argues that graduate engineers have a right to be informed participants in activities that may have broader social dimensions than are recognized by formal research evaluation or educational processes. The process of obtaining the informed consent of graduate engineering students, if implemented effectively, would thus help ensure both their capacity to act as moral agents and their own moral integrity. Since the eventual outcomes of research can be uncertain, complex, and contested, most traditional institutional frameworks-such as principle-based codes of conduct and risk-benefit frameworks-provide an insufficient basis to inform engineers and citizens. Rather, we recommend an ongoing discursive process that explores a number of different actors, contexts, and scenarios, and that evolves with the social context of the engineering research in question. While this may seem burdensome to the engineering research process, it can be integrated directly into the group research meetings and mentorship activities that typically already go on. Moreover, it can actually be seen to benefit engineering practices.",
keywords = "Education, Engineering Ethics, Governance, Informed Consent, Nanotechnology, Social Experimentation, Synthetic Biology",
author = "Erik Fisher and Michael Lightner",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1080/02691720903364167",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "283--300",
journal = "Social Epistemology",
issn = "0269-1728",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Entering the social experiment

T2 - A case for the informed consent of graduate engineering students

AU - Fisher, Erik

AU - Lightner, Michael

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - Taking up the notion of engineering as social experimentation, this paper argues that engineering research laboratory directors have a responsibility to inform graduate engineering students who participate in their research projects of the potential broader social dimensions of those projects. Informing engineers-in-the-making of the broader social dimensions of the research they are learning to conduct would help ensure their future capacity to act as ethically responsible social experimenters. The paper also argues that graduate engineers have a right to be informed participants in activities that may have broader social dimensions than are recognized by formal research evaluation or educational processes. The process of obtaining the informed consent of graduate engineering students, if implemented effectively, would thus help ensure both their capacity to act as moral agents and their own moral integrity. Since the eventual outcomes of research can be uncertain, complex, and contested, most traditional institutional frameworks-such as principle-based codes of conduct and risk-benefit frameworks-provide an insufficient basis to inform engineers and citizens. Rather, we recommend an ongoing discursive process that explores a number of different actors, contexts, and scenarios, and that evolves with the social context of the engineering research in question. While this may seem burdensome to the engineering research process, it can be integrated directly into the group research meetings and mentorship activities that typically already go on. Moreover, it can actually be seen to benefit engineering practices.

AB - Taking up the notion of engineering as social experimentation, this paper argues that engineering research laboratory directors have a responsibility to inform graduate engineering students who participate in their research projects of the potential broader social dimensions of those projects. Informing engineers-in-the-making of the broader social dimensions of the research they are learning to conduct would help ensure their future capacity to act as ethically responsible social experimenters. The paper also argues that graduate engineers have a right to be informed participants in activities that may have broader social dimensions than are recognized by formal research evaluation or educational processes. The process of obtaining the informed consent of graduate engineering students, if implemented effectively, would thus help ensure both their capacity to act as moral agents and their own moral integrity. Since the eventual outcomes of research can be uncertain, complex, and contested, most traditional institutional frameworks-such as principle-based codes of conduct and risk-benefit frameworks-provide an insufficient basis to inform engineers and citizens. Rather, we recommend an ongoing discursive process that explores a number of different actors, contexts, and scenarios, and that evolves with the social context of the engineering research in question. While this may seem burdensome to the engineering research process, it can be integrated directly into the group research meetings and mentorship activities that typically already go on. Moreover, it can actually be seen to benefit engineering practices.

KW - Education

KW - Engineering Ethics

KW - Governance

KW - Informed Consent

KW - Nanotechnology

KW - Social Experimentation

KW - Synthetic Biology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74249105241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74249105241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02691720903364167

DO - 10.1080/02691720903364167

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 283

EP - 300

JO - Social Epistemology

JF - Social Epistemology

SN - 0269-1728

IS - 3-4

ER -