Ensuring quality cancer care: A follow-up review of the Institute of Medicine's 10 recommendations for improving the quality of cancer care in America

Tracy Spinks, Heidi W. Albright, Thomas W. Feeley, Ron Walters, Thomas W. Burke, Thomas Aloia, Eduardo Bruera, Aman Buzdar, Lewis Foxhall, David Hui, Barbara Summers, Alma Rodriguez, Raymond Dubois, Kenneth I. Shine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Responding to growing concerns regarding the safety, quality, and efficacy of cancer care in the United States, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the National Academy of Sciences commissioned a comprehensive review of cancer care delivery in the US health care system in the late 1990s. The National Cancer Policy Board (NCPB), a 20-member board with broad representation, performed this review. In its review, the NCPB focused on the state of cancer care delivery at that time, its shortcomings, and ways to measure and improve the quality of cancer care. The NCPB described an ideal cancer care system in which patients would have equitable access to coordinated, guideline-based care and novel therapies throughout the course of their disease. In 1999, the IOM published the results of this review in its influential report, Ensuring Quality Cancer Care. The report outlined 10 recommendations, which, when implemented, would: 1) improve the quality of cancer care, 2) increase the current understanding of quality cancer care, and 3) reduce or eliminate access barriers to quality cancer care. Despite the fervor generated by this report, there are lingering doubts regarding the safety and quality of cancer care in the United States today. Increased awareness of medical errors and barriers to quality care, coupled with escalating health care costs, has prompted national efforts to reform the health care system. These efforts by health care providers and policymakers should bridge the gap between the ideal state described in Ensuring Quality Cancer Care and the current state of cancer care in the United States. Cancer 2011;.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2571-2582
Number of pages12
JournalCancer
Volume118
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - May 15 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.) Health and Medicine Division
Quality of Health Care
Neoplasms
State Medicine
Delivery of Health Care
Safety
Medical Errors

Keywords

  • benchmarking
  • comparative effectiveness research
  • guideline adherence
  • hospital
  • medically uninsured
  • oncology service
  • palliative care
  • quality of health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Spinks, T., Albright, H. W., Feeley, T. W., Walters, R., Burke, T. W., Aloia, T., ... Shine, K. I. (2012). Ensuring quality cancer care: A follow-up review of the Institute of Medicine's 10 recommendations for improving the quality of cancer care in America. Cancer, 118(10), 2571-2582. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26536

Ensuring quality cancer care : A follow-up review of the Institute of Medicine's 10 recommendations for improving the quality of cancer care in America. / Spinks, Tracy; Albright, Heidi W.; Feeley, Thomas W.; Walters, Ron; Burke, Thomas W.; Aloia, Thomas; Bruera, Eduardo; Buzdar, Aman; Foxhall, Lewis; Hui, David; Summers, Barbara; Rodriguez, Alma; Dubois, Raymond; Shine, Kenneth I.

In: Cancer, Vol. 118, No. 10, 15.05.2012, p. 2571-2582.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Spinks, T, Albright, HW, Feeley, TW, Walters, R, Burke, TW, Aloia, T, Bruera, E, Buzdar, A, Foxhall, L, Hui, D, Summers, B, Rodriguez, A, Dubois, R & Shine, KI 2012, 'Ensuring quality cancer care: A follow-up review of the Institute of Medicine's 10 recommendations for improving the quality of cancer care in America', Cancer, vol. 118, no. 10, pp. 2571-2582. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26536
Spinks, Tracy ; Albright, Heidi W. ; Feeley, Thomas W. ; Walters, Ron ; Burke, Thomas W. ; Aloia, Thomas ; Bruera, Eduardo ; Buzdar, Aman ; Foxhall, Lewis ; Hui, David ; Summers, Barbara ; Rodriguez, Alma ; Dubois, Raymond ; Shine, Kenneth I. / Ensuring quality cancer care : A follow-up review of the Institute of Medicine's 10 recommendations for improving the quality of cancer care in America. In: Cancer. 2012 ; Vol. 118, No. 10. pp. 2571-2582.
@article{0ee72045881c4cad9b8416fe30a8596d,
title = "Ensuring quality cancer care: A follow-up review of the Institute of Medicine's 10 recommendations for improving the quality of cancer care in America",
abstract = "Responding to growing concerns regarding the safety, quality, and efficacy of cancer care in the United States, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the National Academy of Sciences commissioned a comprehensive review of cancer care delivery in the US health care system in the late 1990s. The National Cancer Policy Board (NCPB), a 20-member board with broad representation, performed this review. In its review, the NCPB focused on the state of cancer care delivery at that time, its shortcomings, and ways to measure and improve the quality of cancer care. The NCPB described an ideal cancer care system in which patients would have equitable access to coordinated, guideline-based care and novel therapies throughout the course of their disease. In 1999, the IOM published the results of this review in its influential report, Ensuring Quality Cancer Care. The report outlined 10 recommendations, which, when implemented, would: 1) improve the quality of cancer care, 2) increase the current understanding of quality cancer care, and 3) reduce or eliminate access barriers to quality cancer care. Despite the fervor generated by this report, there are lingering doubts regarding the safety and quality of cancer care in the United States today. Increased awareness of medical errors and barriers to quality care, coupled with escalating health care costs, has prompted national efforts to reform the health care system. These efforts by health care providers and policymakers should bridge the gap between the ideal state described in Ensuring Quality Cancer Care and the current state of cancer care in the United States. Cancer 2011;.",
keywords = "benchmarking, comparative effectiveness research, guideline adherence, hospital, medically uninsured, oncology service, palliative care, quality of health care",
author = "Tracy Spinks and Albright, {Heidi W.} and Feeley, {Thomas W.} and Ron Walters and Burke, {Thomas W.} and Thomas Aloia and Eduardo Bruera and Aman Buzdar and Lewis Foxhall and David Hui and Barbara Summers and Alma Rodriguez and Raymond Dubois and Shine, {Kenneth I.}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1002/cncr.26536",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "118",
pages = "2571--2582",
journal = "Cancer",
issn = "0008-543X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ensuring quality cancer care

T2 - A follow-up review of the Institute of Medicine's 10 recommendations for improving the quality of cancer care in America

AU - Spinks, Tracy

AU - Albright, Heidi W.

AU - Feeley, Thomas W.

AU - Walters, Ron

AU - Burke, Thomas W.

AU - Aloia, Thomas

AU - Bruera, Eduardo

AU - Buzdar, Aman

AU - Foxhall, Lewis

AU - Hui, David

AU - Summers, Barbara

AU - Rodriguez, Alma

AU - Dubois, Raymond

AU - Shine, Kenneth I.

PY - 2012/5/15

Y1 - 2012/5/15

N2 - Responding to growing concerns regarding the safety, quality, and efficacy of cancer care in the United States, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the National Academy of Sciences commissioned a comprehensive review of cancer care delivery in the US health care system in the late 1990s. The National Cancer Policy Board (NCPB), a 20-member board with broad representation, performed this review. In its review, the NCPB focused on the state of cancer care delivery at that time, its shortcomings, and ways to measure and improve the quality of cancer care. The NCPB described an ideal cancer care system in which patients would have equitable access to coordinated, guideline-based care and novel therapies throughout the course of their disease. In 1999, the IOM published the results of this review in its influential report, Ensuring Quality Cancer Care. The report outlined 10 recommendations, which, when implemented, would: 1) improve the quality of cancer care, 2) increase the current understanding of quality cancer care, and 3) reduce or eliminate access barriers to quality cancer care. Despite the fervor generated by this report, there are lingering doubts regarding the safety and quality of cancer care in the United States today. Increased awareness of medical errors and barriers to quality care, coupled with escalating health care costs, has prompted national efforts to reform the health care system. These efforts by health care providers and policymakers should bridge the gap between the ideal state described in Ensuring Quality Cancer Care and the current state of cancer care in the United States. Cancer 2011;.

AB - Responding to growing concerns regarding the safety, quality, and efficacy of cancer care in the United States, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the National Academy of Sciences commissioned a comprehensive review of cancer care delivery in the US health care system in the late 1990s. The National Cancer Policy Board (NCPB), a 20-member board with broad representation, performed this review. In its review, the NCPB focused on the state of cancer care delivery at that time, its shortcomings, and ways to measure and improve the quality of cancer care. The NCPB described an ideal cancer care system in which patients would have equitable access to coordinated, guideline-based care and novel therapies throughout the course of their disease. In 1999, the IOM published the results of this review in its influential report, Ensuring Quality Cancer Care. The report outlined 10 recommendations, which, when implemented, would: 1) improve the quality of cancer care, 2) increase the current understanding of quality cancer care, and 3) reduce or eliminate access barriers to quality cancer care. Despite the fervor generated by this report, there are lingering doubts regarding the safety and quality of cancer care in the United States today. Increased awareness of medical errors and barriers to quality care, coupled with escalating health care costs, has prompted national efforts to reform the health care system. These efforts by health care providers and policymakers should bridge the gap between the ideal state described in Ensuring Quality Cancer Care and the current state of cancer care in the United States. Cancer 2011;.

KW - benchmarking

KW - comparative effectiveness research

KW - guideline adherence

KW - hospital

KW - medically uninsured

KW - oncology service

KW - palliative care

KW - quality of health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860661904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860661904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/cncr.26536

DO - 10.1002/cncr.26536

M3 - Article

C2 - 22045610

AN - SCOPUS:84860661904

VL - 118

SP - 2571

EP - 2582

JO - Cancer

JF - Cancer

SN - 0008-543X

IS - 10

ER -