Engagement Motivations in Professional Associations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article follows Knoke in exploring how public incentives offered by professional associations (such as lobbying on behalf of collective interests) compete with private incentives (such as member networking opportunity) in promoting monetary gifts, voluntary coproduction of organizational outcomes, and commitment to the association. Olson's contention that public goods do not motivate civic engagement has fostered several decades of research geared toward establishing the role of such goods in associational outcomes. Based on membership surveys of three engineering associations and two health care associations, the study concludes that private incentives are not universal motivators, while public incentives show some evidence of motivating engagement. Unexpected differences between the two fields of professional association are striking, prompting suggestions that current practitioners and future research give attention to field differences and resist overgeneralization regarding engagement motivations, outcomes, and commitment across professional fields.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalNonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
Volume43
Issue numberS2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

professional association
incentive
commitment
coproduction
gift
networking
health care
engineering
evidence

Keywords

  • associations
  • commitment
  • giving
  • volunteering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Engagement Motivations in Professional Associations. / Hager, Mark.

In: Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 43, No. S2, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0aac5244d5824192a3ee40d063c5e516,
title = "Engagement Motivations in Professional Associations",
abstract = "This article follows Knoke in exploring how public incentives offered by professional associations (such as lobbying on behalf of collective interests) compete with private incentives (such as member networking opportunity) in promoting monetary gifts, voluntary coproduction of organizational outcomes, and commitment to the association. Olson's contention that public goods do not motivate civic engagement has fostered several decades of research geared toward establishing the role of such goods in associational outcomes. Based on membership surveys of three engineering associations and two health care associations, the study concludes that private incentives are not universal motivators, while public incentives show some evidence of motivating engagement. Unexpected differences between the two fields of professional association are striking, prompting suggestions that current practitioners and future research give attention to field differences and resist overgeneralization regarding engagement motivations, outcomes, and commitment across professional fields.",
keywords = "associations, commitment, giving, volunteering",
author = "Mark Hager",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/0899764013502582",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
journal = "Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly",
issn = "0899-7640",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "S2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Engagement Motivations in Professional Associations

AU - Hager, Mark

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This article follows Knoke in exploring how public incentives offered by professional associations (such as lobbying on behalf of collective interests) compete with private incentives (such as member networking opportunity) in promoting monetary gifts, voluntary coproduction of organizational outcomes, and commitment to the association. Olson's contention that public goods do not motivate civic engagement has fostered several decades of research geared toward establishing the role of such goods in associational outcomes. Based on membership surveys of three engineering associations and two health care associations, the study concludes that private incentives are not universal motivators, while public incentives show some evidence of motivating engagement. Unexpected differences between the two fields of professional association are striking, prompting suggestions that current practitioners and future research give attention to field differences and resist overgeneralization regarding engagement motivations, outcomes, and commitment across professional fields.

AB - This article follows Knoke in exploring how public incentives offered by professional associations (such as lobbying on behalf of collective interests) compete with private incentives (such as member networking opportunity) in promoting monetary gifts, voluntary coproduction of organizational outcomes, and commitment to the association. Olson's contention that public goods do not motivate civic engagement has fostered several decades of research geared toward establishing the role of such goods in associational outcomes. Based on membership surveys of three engineering associations and two health care associations, the study concludes that private incentives are not universal motivators, while public incentives show some evidence of motivating engagement. Unexpected differences between the two fields of professional association are striking, prompting suggestions that current practitioners and future research give attention to field differences and resist overgeneralization regarding engagement motivations, outcomes, and commitment across professional fields.

KW - associations

KW - commitment

KW - giving

KW - volunteering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84900406257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84900406257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0899764013502582

DO - 10.1177/0899764013502582

M3 - Article

VL - 43

JO - Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

JF - Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

SN - 0899-7640

IS - S2

ER -