Engaged participation

A sociocultural model of motivation with implications for educational assessment

Daniel T. Hickey, Steven Zuiker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article considers issues in educational reform, particularly accountability-oriented policies, and student motivation. We argue that prominent theories of motivation derived from cognitive traits/states are antithetical to the assumptions underlying conventional assessment formats and accountability-oriented reforms. We advance an alternative perspective that emerges from sociocultural assumptions. In this perspective, the values and beliefs that motivate engagement in learning reside alongside the practices that characterize knowledge communities and, together, constitute a model of practice. We therefore explore the complex issue of reconciliation between the activities of individuals and social contexts and how "dialectical" reconciliation addresses tensions between classroom assessment and external testing, and between formative and summative functions of assessment. Data and conclusions from a program of research in science education illustrate and warrant these considerations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)277-305
Number of pages29
JournalEducational Assessment
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

reconciliation
participation
responsibility
educational reform
classroom
reform
science
learning
community
Values
education
student

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Engaged participation : A sociocultural model of motivation with implications for educational assessment. / Hickey, Daniel T.; Zuiker, Steven.

In: Educational Assessment, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2005, p. 277-305.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ad32715e6d71406b965377fbc4599916,
title = "Engaged participation: A sociocultural model of motivation with implications for educational assessment",
abstract = "This article considers issues in educational reform, particularly accountability-oriented policies, and student motivation. We argue that prominent theories of motivation derived from cognitive traits/states are antithetical to the assumptions underlying conventional assessment formats and accountability-oriented reforms. We advance an alternative perspective that emerges from sociocultural assumptions. In this perspective, the values and beliefs that motivate engagement in learning reside alongside the practices that characterize knowledge communities and, together, constitute a model of practice. We therefore explore the complex issue of reconciliation between the activities of individuals and social contexts and how {"}dialectical{"} reconciliation addresses tensions between classroom assessment and external testing, and between formative and summative functions of assessment. Data and conclusions from a program of research in science education illustrate and warrant these considerations.",
author = "Hickey, {Daniel T.} and Steven Zuiker",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1207/s15326977ea1003_7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "277--305",
journal = "Educational Assessment",
issn = "1062-7197",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Engaged participation

T2 - A sociocultural model of motivation with implications for educational assessment

AU - Hickey, Daniel T.

AU - Zuiker, Steven

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - This article considers issues in educational reform, particularly accountability-oriented policies, and student motivation. We argue that prominent theories of motivation derived from cognitive traits/states are antithetical to the assumptions underlying conventional assessment formats and accountability-oriented reforms. We advance an alternative perspective that emerges from sociocultural assumptions. In this perspective, the values and beliefs that motivate engagement in learning reside alongside the practices that characterize knowledge communities and, together, constitute a model of practice. We therefore explore the complex issue of reconciliation between the activities of individuals and social contexts and how "dialectical" reconciliation addresses tensions between classroom assessment and external testing, and between formative and summative functions of assessment. Data and conclusions from a program of research in science education illustrate and warrant these considerations.

AB - This article considers issues in educational reform, particularly accountability-oriented policies, and student motivation. We argue that prominent theories of motivation derived from cognitive traits/states are antithetical to the assumptions underlying conventional assessment formats and accountability-oriented reforms. We advance an alternative perspective that emerges from sociocultural assumptions. In this perspective, the values and beliefs that motivate engagement in learning reside alongside the practices that characterize knowledge communities and, together, constitute a model of practice. We therefore explore the complex issue of reconciliation between the activities of individuals and social contexts and how "dialectical" reconciliation addresses tensions between classroom assessment and external testing, and between formative and summative functions of assessment. Data and conclusions from a program of research in science education illustrate and warrant these considerations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27844502122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27844502122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/s15326977ea1003_7

DO - 10.1207/s15326977ea1003_7

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 277

EP - 305

JO - Educational Assessment

JF - Educational Assessment

SN - 1062-7197

IS - 3

ER -