Energy futures: Five dilemmas of the practice of anticipatory governance

Sarah R. Davies, Cynthia Selin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Public participation has become standard practice in both environmental communication and science and technology studies, with such engagement increasingly moving "upstream" to the early stages of technological development. One framework for these activities is anticipatory governance, in which foresight and public and stakeholder engagement are used to reflect on - and direct - the impacts of new technology. In this essay we draw on our experience of anticipatory governance, in the shape of the " NanoFutures" project on energy futures, to present a reflexive analysis of engagement and deliberation. We draw out five tensions of the practice of deliberation on energy technologies. Through tracing the lineages of these dilemmas, we discuss some of the implications of these tensions for the practice of civic engagement and deliberation in a set of questions for this community of practitioner-scholars.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-136
Number of pages18
JournalEnvironmental Communication
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2012

Fingerprint

technological development
science and technology
energy
stakeholder
communication
public
public participation
analysis
project
new technology
energy technology

Keywords

  • Anticipatory Governance
  • Deliberation
  • Energy
  • Nanotechnology
  • Public Participation
  • Reflexivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Energy futures : Five dilemmas of the practice of anticipatory governance. / Davies, Sarah R.; Selin, Cynthia.

In: Environmental Communication, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.03.2012, p. 119-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{56a129b944ab430b991a700329ff019d,
title = "Energy futures: Five dilemmas of the practice of anticipatory governance",
abstract = "Public participation has become standard practice in both environmental communication and science and technology studies, with such engagement increasingly moving {"}upstream{"} to the early stages of technological development. One framework for these activities is anticipatory governance, in which foresight and public and stakeholder engagement are used to reflect on - and direct - the impacts of new technology. In this essay we draw on our experience of anticipatory governance, in the shape of the {"} NanoFutures{"} project on energy futures, to present a reflexive analysis of engagement and deliberation. We draw out five tensions of the practice of deliberation on energy technologies. Through tracing the lineages of these dilemmas, we discuss some of the implications of these tensions for the practice of civic engagement and deliberation in a set of questions for this community of practitioner-scholars.",
keywords = "Anticipatory Governance, Deliberation, Energy, Nanotechnology, Public Participation, Reflexivity",
author = "Davies, {Sarah R.} and Cynthia Selin",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/17524032.2011.644632",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "119--136",
journal = "Environmental Communication",
issn = "1752-4032",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Energy futures

T2 - Five dilemmas of the practice of anticipatory governance

AU - Davies, Sarah R.

AU - Selin, Cynthia

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - Public participation has become standard practice in both environmental communication and science and technology studies, with such engagement increasingly moving "upstream" to the early stages of technological development. One framework for these activities is anticipatory governance, in which foresight and public and stakeholder engagement are used to reflect on - and direct - the impacts of new technology. In this essay we draw on our experience of anticipatory governance, in the shape of the " NanoFutures" project on energy futures, to present a reflexive analysis of engagement and deliberation. We draw out five tensions of the practice of deliberation on energy technologies. Through tracing the lineages of these dilemmas, we discuss some of the implications of these tensions for the practice of civic engagement and deliberation in a set of questions for this community of practitioner-scholars.

AB - Public participation has become standard practice in both environmental communication and science and technology studies, with such engagement increasingly moving "upstream" to the early stages of technological development. One framework for these activities is anticipatory governance, in which foresight and public and stakeholder engagement are used to reflect on - and direct - the impacts of new technology. In this essay we draw on our experience of anticipatory governance, in the shape of the " NanoFutures" project on energy futures, to present a reflexive analysis of engagement and deliberation. We draw out five tensions of the practice of deliberation on energy technologies. Through tracing the lineages of these dilemmas, we discuss some of the implications of these tensions for the practice of civic engagement and deliberation in a set of questions for this community of practitioner-scholars.

KW - Anticipatory Governance

KW - Deliberation

KW - Energy

KW - Nanotechnology

KW - Public Participation

KW - Reflexivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859176295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859176295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17524032.2011.644632

DO - 10.1080/17524032.2011.644632

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84859176295

VL - 6

SP - 119

EP - 136

JO - Environmental Communication

JF - Environmental Communication

SN - 1752-4032

IS - 1

ER -