Energy cost expression for a youth compendium of physical activities

Rationale for using age groups

Karin A. Pfeiffer, Kathleen B. Watson, Robert G. McMurray, David R. Bassett, Nancy F. Butte, Scott E. Crouter, Stephen D. Herrmann, Stewart G. Trost, Barbara Ainsworth, Janet E. Fulton, David Berrigan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This study compared the accuracy of physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) prediction using 2 methods of accounting for age dependency versus 1 standard (single) value across all ages. Methods: PAEE estimates were derived by pooling data from 5 studies. Participants, 6-18 years (n = 929), engaged in 14 activities while in a room calorimeter or wearing a portable metabolic analyzer. Linear regression was used to estimate the measurement error in PAEE (expressed as youth metabolic equivalent) associated with using age groups (6-9, 10-12, 13-15, and 16-18 y) and age-in-years [each year of chronological age (eg, 12 = 12.0-12.99 y)] versus the standard (a single value across all ages). Results: Age groups and age-in-years showed similar error, and both showed less error than the standard method for cycling, skilled, and moderate-to vigorous-intensity activities. For sedentary and light activities, the standard had similar error to the other 2 methods.Mean values for root mean square error ranged from 0.2 to 1.7 youth metabolic equivalent across all activities. Error reduction ranged from -0.2% to 21.7% for age groups and -0.23% to 18.2% for age-in-years compared with the standard. Conclusions: Accounting for age showed lower errors than a standard (single) value; using an age-dependent model in the Youth Compendium is recommended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)144-151
Number of pages8
JournalPediatric Exercise Science
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

Age Groups
Exercise
Costs and Cost Analysis
Metabolic Equivalent
Energy Metabolism
Meta-Analysis
Linear Models
Light

Keywords

  • Adolescents
  • Children
  • Energy expenditure
  • MET

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Pfeiffer, K. A., Watson, K. B., McMurray, R. G., Bassett, D. R., Butte, N. F., Crouter, S. E., ... Berrigan, D. (2018). Energy cost expression for a youth compendium of physical activities: Rationale for using age groups. Pediatric Exercise Science, 30(1), 144-151. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2016-0249

Energy cost expression for a youth compendium of physical activities : Rationale for using age groups. / Pfeiffer, Karin A.; Watson, Kathleen B.; McMurray, Robert G.; Bassett, David R.; Butte, Nancy F.; Crouter, Scott E.; Herrmann, Stephen D.; Trost, Stewart G.; Ainsworth, Barbara; Fulton, Janet E.; Berrigan, David.

In: Pediatric Exercise Science, Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.02.2018, p. 144-151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pfeiffer, KA, Watson, KB, McMurray, RG, Bassett, DR, Butte, NF, Crouter, SE, Herrmann, SD, Trost, SG, Ainsworth, B, Fulton, JE & Berrigan, D 2018, 'Energy cost expression for a youth compendium of physical activities: Rationale for using age groups', Pediatric Exercise Science, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 144-151. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2016-0249
Pfeiffer, Karin A. ; Watson, Kathleen B. ; McMurray, Robert G. ; Bassett, David R. ; Butte, Nancy F. ; Crouter, Scott E. ; Herrmann, Stephen D. ; Trost, Stewart G. ; Ainsworth, Barbara ; Fulton, Janet E. ; Berrigan, David. / Energy cost expression for a youth compendium of physical activities : Rationale for using age groups. In: Pediatric Exercise Science. 2018 ; Vol. 30, No. 1. pp. 144-151.
@article{0677dcc267f740f88e7681ad118c32d1,
title = "Energy cost expression for a youth compendium of physical activities: Rationale for using age groups",
abstract = "Purpose: This study compared the accuracy of physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) prediction using 2 methods of accounting for age dependency versus 1 standard (single) value across all ages. Methods: PAEE estimates were derived by pooling data from 5 studies. Participants, 6-18 years (n = 929), engaged in 14 activities while in a room calorimeter or wearing a portable metabolic analyzer. Linear regression was used to estimate the measurement error in PAEE (expressed as youth metabolic equivalent) associated with using age groups (6-9, 10-12, 13-15, and 16-18 y) and age-in-years [each year of chronological age (eg, 12 = 12.0-12.99 y)] versus the standard (a single value across all ages). Results: Age groups and age-in-years showed similar error, and both showed less error than the standard method for cycling, skilled, and moderate-to vigorous-intensity activities. For sedentary and light activities, the standard had similar error to the other 2 methods.Mean values for root mean square error ranged from 0.2 to 1.7 youth metabolic equivalent across all activities. Error reduction ranged from -0.2{\%} to 21.7{\%} for age groups and -0.23{\%} to 18.2{\%} for age-in-years compared with the standard. Conclusions: Accounting for age showed lower errors than a standard (single) value; using an age-dependent model in the Youth Compendium is recommended.",
keywords = "Adolescents, Children, Energy expenditure, MET",
author = "Pfeiffer, {Karin A.} and Watson, {Kathleen B.} and McMurray, {Robert G.} and Bassett, {David R.} and Butte, {Nancy F.} and Crouter, {Scott E.} and Herrmann, {Stephen D.} and Trost, {Stewart G.} and Barbara Ainsworth and Fulton, {Janet E.} and David Berrigan",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1123/pes.2016-0249",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "144--151",
journal = "Pediatric Exercise Science",
issn = "0899-8493",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Energy cost expression for a youth compendium of physical activities

T2 - Rationale for using age groups

AU - Pfeiffer, Karin A.

AU - Watson, Kathleen B.

AU - McMurray, Robert G.

AU - Bassett, David R.

AU - Butte, Nancy F.

AU - Crouter, Scott E.

AU - Herrmann, Stephen D.

AU - Trost, Stewart G.

AU - Ainsworth, Barbara

AU - Fulton, Janet E.

AU - Berrigan, David

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Purpose: This study compared the accuracy of physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) prediction using 2 methods of accounting for age dependency versus 1 standard (single) value across all ages. Methods: PAEE estimates were derived by pooling data from 5 studies. Participants, 6-18 years (n = 929), engaged in 14 activities while in a room calorimeter or wearing a portable metabolic analyzer. Linear regression was used to estimate the measurement error in PAEE (expressed as youth metabolic equivalent) associated with using age groups (6-9, 10-12, 13-15, and 16-18 y) and age-in-years [each year of chronological age (eg, 12 = 12.0-12.99 y)] versus the standard (a single value across all ages). Results: Age groups and age-in-years showed similar error, and both showed less error than the standard method for cycling, skilled, and moderate-to vigorous-intensity activities. For sedentary and light activities, the standard had similar error to the other 2 methods.Mean values for root mean square error ranged from 0.2 to 1.7 youth metabolic equivalent across all activities. Error reduction ranged from -0.2% to 21.7% for age groups and -0.23% to 18.2% for age-in-years compared with the standard. Conclusions: Accounting for age showed lower errors than a standard (single) value; using an age-dependent model in the Youth Compendium is recommended.

AB - Purpose: This study compared the accuracy of physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) prediction using 2 methods of accounting for age dependency versus 1 standard (single) value across all ages. Methods: PAEE estimates were derived by pooling data from 5 studies. Participants, 6-18 years (n = 929), engaged in 14 activities while in a room calorimeter or wearing a portable metabolic analyzer. Linear regression was used to estimate the measurement error in PAEE (expressed as youth metabolic equivalent) associated with using age groups (6-9, 10-12, 13-15, and 16-18 y) and age-in-years [each year of chronological age (eg, 12 = 12.0-12.99 y)] versus the standard (a single value across all ages). Results: Age groups and age-in-years showed similar error, and both showed less error than the standard method for cycling, skilled, and moderate-to vigorous-intensity activities. For sedentary and light activities, the standard had similar error to the other 2 methods.Mean values for root mean square error ranged from 0.2 to 1.7 youth metabolic equivalent across all activities. Error reduction ranged from -0.2% to 21.7% for age groups and -0.23% to 18.2% for age-in-years compared with the standard. Conclusions: Accounting for age showed lower errors than a standard (single) value; using an age-dependent model in the Youth Compendium is recommended.

KW - Adolescents

KW - Children

KW - Energy expenditure

KW - MET

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042632542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042632542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1123/pes.2016-0249

DO - 10.1123/pes.2016-0249

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 144

EP - 151

JO - Pediatric Exercise Science

JF - Pediatric Exercise Science

SN - 0899-8493

IS - 1

ER -