Encouraging Upward Ethical Dissent in Organizations

The Role of Deference to Embodied Expertise

Ryan S. Bisel, Elissa Adame

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article demonstrates that when supervisors encourage subordinates to defer to their embodied expertise, subordinates are more likely to voice explicitly moralized upward dissent to an unethical business request. Working adults (N = 312) were randomly assigned to respond to an unethical business request from their boss in one of three scenarios that varied by how much the supervisor was known for encouraging deference to (a) embodied knowing, (b) intellectual reasoning, or (c) neither (i.e., a baseline control condition). Analyses revealed that participants were more than twice as likely to voice their private moral concerns explicitly with their boss when the supervisor was known for valuing subordinates’ embodied expertise (e.g., “going with your gut feelings”). In addition, participants also reported feeling significantly less communication anxiety in that same condition. Implications for leading organizational ethics conclude the article.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalManagement Communication Quarterly
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Supervisory personnel
expertise
moral philosophy
scenario
anxiety
communication
Industry
Communication
Expertise
Supervisors
Dissent

Keywords

  • ERO theory
  • mum effect
  • organizational communication ethics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

@article{15db08bdfaf243f885065e07c297841e,
title = "Encouraging Upward Ethical Dissent in Organizations: The Role of Deference to Embodied Expertise",
abstract = "This article demonstrates that when supervisors encourage subordinates to defer to their embodied expertise, subordinates are more likely to voice explicitly moralized upward dissent to an unethical business request. Working adults (N = 312) were randomly assigned to respond to an unethical business request from their boss in one of three scenarios that varied by how much the supervisor was known for encouraging deference to (a) embodied knowing, (b) intellectual reasoning, or (c) neither (i.e., a baseline control condition). Analyses revealed that participants were more than twice as likely to voice their private moral concerns explicitly with their boss when the supervisor was known for valuing subordinates’ embodied expertise (e.g., “going with your gut feelings”). In addition, participants also reported feeling significantly less communication anxiety in that same condition. Implications for leading organizational ethics conclude the article.",
keywords = "ERO theory, mum effect, organizational communication ethics",
author = "Bisel, {Ryan S.} and Elissa Adame",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0893318918811949",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Management Communication Quarterly",
issn = "0893-3189",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Encouraging Upward Ethical Dissent in Organizations

T2 - The Role of Deference to Embodied Expertise

AU - Bisel, Ryan S.

AU - Adame, Elissa

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This article demonstrates that when supervisors encourage subordinates to defer to their embodied expertise, subordinates are more likely to voice explicitly moralized upward dissent to an unethical business request. Working adults (N = 312) were randomly assigned to respond to an unethical business request from their boss in one of three scenarios that varied by how much the supervisor was known for encouraging deference to (a) embodied knowing, (b) intellectual reasoning, or (c) neither (i.e., a baseline control condition). Analyses revealed that participants were more than twice as likely to voice their private moral concerns explicitly with their boss when the supervisor was known for valuing subordinates’ embodied expertise (e.g., “going with your gut feelings”). In addition, participants also reported feeling significantly less communication anxiety in that same condition. Implications for leading organizational ethics conclude the article.

AB - This article demonstrates that when supervisors encourage subordinates to defer to their embodied expertise, subordinates are more likely to voice explicitly moralized upward dissent to an unethical business request. Working adults (N = 312) were randomly assigned to respond to an unethical business request from their boss in one of three scenarios that varied by how much the supervisor was known for encouraging deference to (a) embodied knowing, (b) intellectual reasoning, or (c) neither (i.e., a baseline control condition). Analyses revealed that participants were more than twice as likely to voice their private moral concerns explicitly with their boss when the supervisor was known for valuing subordinates’ embodied expertise (e.g., “going with your gut feelings”). In addition, participants also reported feeling significantly less communication anxiety in that same condition. Implications for leading organizational ethics conclude the article.

KW - ERO theory

KW - mum effect

KW - organizational communication ethics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058667590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058667590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0893318918811949

DO - 10.1177/0893318918811949

M3 - Article

JO - Management Communication Quarterly

JF - Management Communication Quarterly

SN - 0893-3189

ER -