Empirical distributions of vehicle use and fuel efficiency across space

Implications of asymmetry for measuring policy incidence

Jonathan A. Cook, James N. Sanchirico, Deborah Salon, Jeffrey Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Concerns about local air pollution and climate change have prompted all levels of government to consider a variety of policies to reduce vehicle dependence and fuel consumption, as the transportation sector is one of the largest sources of local and global emissions. Because many of the policy options under consideration are market-based (e.g., gasoline tax, carbon tax), it is important to consider how the impacts would vary across space and affect different subpopulations. Evaluating incidence is relevant for both the expected costs and benefits of a particular policy, however detailed data on vehicle-miles traveled (VMT) and fuel consumption allowing for the distributions of these variables to be estimated at a fine geographic scale is rarely available. This paper uses a unique dataset with more than 20. million vehicles in California to derive estimates of VMT and fuel consumption in order to examine the spatial distribution of impacts for an increase in the price of gasoline as well as the consequences of using different statistics for policy evaluation. Results show that VMT and fuel consumption distributions are not symmetrically distributed and vary significantly within transportation planning regions. To understand the potential implications of this asymmetry, we do a back of the envelope comparison using the mean and mode of the VMT or fuel consumption distribution for policy analysis. We find that assuming a symmetric distribution can lead to a divergence of 20-40% from the estimates based on the empirical distribution. Our results, therefore, introduce caution in interpreting the incidence of policies targeting the transportation sector based on averages.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)187-199
Number of pages13
JournalTransportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
Volume78
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint

asymmetry
Fuel consumption
incidence
efficiency
Taxation
taxes
Gasoline
air pollution
Air pollution
Climate change
divergence
Spatial distribution
Empirical distribution
Asymmetry
Fuel efficiency
climate change
statistics
Statistics
Planning
Carbon

Keywords

  • Climate policy
  • Fuel consumption
  • Policy incidence
  • Spatial analysis
  • Transportation policy
  • VMT

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Transportation

Cite this

Empirical distributions of vehicle use and fuel efficiency across space : Implications of asymmetry for measuring policy incidence. / Cook, Jonathan A.; Sanchirico, James N.; Salon, Deborah; Williams, Jeffrey.

In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 78, 01.08.2015, p. 187-199.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{eb7eee65e1ee466d8ea3966a1f66a27e,
title = "Empirical distributions of vehicle use and fuel efficiency across space: Implications of asymmetry for measuring policy incidence",
abstract = "Concerns about local air pollution and climate change have prompted all levels of government to consider a variety of policies to reduce vehicle dependence and fuel consumption, as the transportation sector is one of the largest sources of local and global emissions. Because many of the policy options under consideration are market-based (e.g., gasoline tax, carbon tax), it is important to consider how the impacts would vary across space and affect different subpopulations. Evaluating incidence is relevant for both the expected costs and benefits of a particular policy, however detailed data on vehicle-miles traveled (VMT) and fuel consumption allowing for the distributions of these variables to be estimated at a fine geographic scale is rarely available. This paper uses a unique dataset with more than 20. million vehicles in California to derive estimates of VMT and fuel consumption in order to examine the spatial distribution of impacts for an increase in the price of gasoline as well as the consequences of using different statistics for policy evaluation. Results show that VMT and fuel consumption distributions are not symmetrically distributed and vary significantly within transportation planning regions. To understand the potential implications of this asymmetry, we do a back of the envelope comparison using the mean and mode of the VMT or fuel consumption distribution for policy analysis. We find that assuming a symmetric distribution can lead to a divergence of 20-40{\%} from the estimates based on the empirical distribution. Our results, therefore, introduce caution in interpreting the incidence of policies targeting the transportation sector based on averages.",
keywords = "Climate policy, Fuel consumption, Policy incidence, Spatial analysis, Transportation policy, VMT",
author = "Cook, {Jonathan A.} and Sanchirico, {James N.} and Deborah Salon and Jeffrey Williams",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.030",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "187--199",
journal = "Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice",
issn = "0965-8564",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empirical distributions of vehicle use and fuel efficiency across space

T2 - Implications of asymmetry for measuring policy incidence

AU - Cook, Jonathan A.

AU - Sanchirico, James N.

AU - Salon, Deborah

AU - Williams, Jeffrey

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - Concerns about local air pollution and climate change have prompted all levels of government to consider a variety of policies to reduce vehicle dependence and fuel consumption, as the transportation sector is one of the largest sources of local and global emissions. Because many of the policy options under consideration are market-based (e.g., gasoline tax, carbon tax), it is important to consider how the impacts would vary across space and affect different subpopulations. Evaluating incidence is relevant for both the expected costs and benefits of a particular policy, however detailed data on vehicle-miles traveled (VMT) and fuel consumption allowing for the distributions of these variables to be estimated at a fine geographic scale is rarely available. This paper uses a unique dataset with more than 20. million vehicles in California to derive estimates of VMT and fuel consumption in order to examine the spatial distribution of impacts for an increase in the price of gasoline as well as the consequences of using different statistics for policy evaluation. Results show that VMT and fuel consumption distributions are not symmetrically distributed and vary significantly within transportation planning regions. To understand the potential implications of this asymmetry, we do a back of the envelope comparison using the mean and mode of the VMT or fuel consumption distribution for policy analysis. We find that assuming a symmetric distribution can lead to a divergence of 20-40% from the estimates based on the empirical distribution. Our results, therefore, introduce caution in interpreting the incidence of policies targeting the transportation sector based on averages.

AB - Concerns about local air pollution and climate change have prompted all levels of government to consider a variety of policies to reduce vehicle dependence and fuel consumption, as the transportation sector is one of the largest sources of local and global emissions. Because many of the policy options under consideration are market-based (e.g., gasoline tax, carbon tax), it is important to consider how the impacts would vary across space and affect different subpopulations. Evaluating incidence is relevant for both the expected costs and benefits of a particular policy, however detailed data on vehicle-miles traveled (VMT) and fuel consumption allowing for the distributions of these variables to be estimated at a fine geographic scale is rarely available. This paper uses a unique dataset with more than 20. million vehicles in California to derive estimates of VMT and fuel consumption in order to examine the spatial distribution of impacts for an increase in the price of gasoline as well as the consequences of using different statistics for policy evaluation. Results show that VMT and fuel consumption distributions are not symmetrically distributed and vary significantly within transportation planning regions. To understand the potential implications of this asymmetry, we do a back of the envelope comparison using the mean and mode of the VMT or fuel consumption distribution for policy analysis. We find that assuming a symmetric distribution can lead to a divergence of 20-40% from the estimates based on the empirical distribution. Our results, therefore, introduce caution in interpreting the incidence of policies targeting the transportation sector based on averages.

KW - Climate policy

KW - Fuel consumption

KW - Policy incidence

KW - Spatial analysis

KW - Transportation policy

KW - VMT

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930939854&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930939854&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.030

DO - 10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.030

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 187

EP - 199

JO - Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice

JF - Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice

SN - 0965-8564

ER -