Abstract
This study compares the performance of design/bid/build and design/build to see if one project delivery method is superior in regards to time and cost. Similar military buildings were used to identify two samples of projects delivered with each of the two delivery methods. These projects provide a meaningful comparison because they include buildings of the same typology (i.e., U.S. Navy Bachelor Enlisted Quarters) delivered using similar design models. Project duration, project duration per bed, project time growth, cost growth and cost per bed were statistically compared. Upon completion of the analysis, the hypothesis that design/build projects are superior to design/bid/build projects in regards to time and cost was tested. Design/build projects were proven superior in performance in almost every measure. Other findings, including recommendations to practitioners and researchers, will be provided as well.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 579-587 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management |
| Volume | 135 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2009 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Bids
- Construction costs
- Construction management
- Design/build
- Military engineering
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Building and Construction
- Industrial relations
- Strategy and Management