Empiric validation of a process for behavior change

Diane L. Elliot, Linn Goldberg, David Mackinnon, Krista W. Ranby, Kerry S. Kuehl, Esther L. Moe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most behavior change trials focus on outcomes rather than deconstructing how those outcomes related to programmatic theoretical underpinnings and intervention components. In this report, the process of change is compared for three evidence-based programs’ that shared theories, intervention elements and potential mediating variables. Each investigation was a randomized trial that assessed pre- and post- intervention variables using survey constructs with established reliability. Each also used mediation analyses to define relationships. The findings were combined using a pattern matching approach. Surprisingly, knowledge was a significant mediator in each program (a and b path effects [p<0.01]). Norms, perceived control abilities, and self-monitoring were confirmed in at least two studies (p<0.01 for each). Replication of findings across studies with a common design but varied populations provides a robust validation of the theory and processes of an effective intervention. Combined findings also demonstrate a means to substantiate process aspects and theoretical models to advance understanding of behavior change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)449-456
Number of pages8
JournalTranslational Behavioral Medicine
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Theoretical Models
Population
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Behavior change
  • Mediation
  • Peer-led

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Elliot, D. L., Goldberg, L., Mackinnon, D., Ranby, K. W., Kuehl, K. S., & Moe, E. L. (2016). Empiric validation of a process for behavior change. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 6(3), 449-456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0343-y

Empiric validation of a process for behavior change. / Elliot, Diane L.; Goldberg, Linn; Mackinnon, David; Ranby, Krista W.; Kuehl, Kerry S.; Moe, Esther L.

In: Translational Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 6, No. 3, 01.09.2016, p. 449-456.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Elliot, DL, Goldberg, L, Mackinnon, D, Ranby, KW, Kuehl, KS & Moe, EL 2016, 'Empiric validation of a process for behavior change', Translational Behavioral Medicine, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 449-456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0343-y
Elliot, Diane L. ; Goldberg, Linn ; Mackinnon, David ; Ranby, Krista W. ; Kuehl, Kerry S. ; Moe, Esther L. / Empiric validation of a process for behavior change. In: Translational Behavioral Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 6, No. 3. pp. 449-456.
@article{7639cd2d8a4c48909e9deb4f48727638,
title = "Empiric validation of a process for behavior change",
abstract = "Most behavior change trials focus on outcomes rather than deconstructing how those outcomes related to programmatic theoretical underpinnings and intervention components. In this report, the process of change is compared for three evidence-based programs’ that shared theories, intervention elements and potential mediating variables. Each investigation was a randomized trial that assessed pre- and post- intervention variables using survey constructs with established reliability. Each also used mediation analyses to define relationships. The findings were combined using a pattern matching approach. Surprisingly, knowledge was a significant mediator in each program (a and b path effects [p<0.01]). Norms, perceived control abilities, and self-monitoring were confirmed in at least two studies (p<0.01 for each). Replication of findings across studies with a common design but varied populations provides a robust validation of the theory and processes of an effective intervention. Combined findings also demonstrate a means to substantiate process aspects and theoretical models to advance understanding of behavior change.",
keywords = "Behavior change, Mediation, Peer-led",
author = "Elliot, {Diane L.} and Linn Goldberg and David Mackinnon and Ranby, {Krista W.} and Kuehl, {Kerry S.} and Moe, {Esther L.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13142-015-0343-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "449--456",
journal = "Translational Behavioral Medicine",
issn = "1869-6716",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empiric validation of a process for behavior change

AU - Elliot, Diane L.

AU - Goldberg, Linn

AU - Mackinnon, David

AU - Ranby, Krista W.

AU - Kuehl, Kerry S.

AU - Moe, Esther L.

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Most behavior change trials focus on outcomes rather than deconstructing how those outcomes related to programmatic theoretical underpinnings and intervention components. In this report, the process of change is compared for three evidence-based programs’ that shared theories, intervention elements and potential mediating variables. Each investigation was a randomized trial that assessed pre- and post- intervention variables using survey constructs with established reliability. Each also used mediation analyses to define relationships. The findings were combined using a pattern matching approach. Surprisingly, knowledge was a significant mediator in each program (a and b path effects [p<0.01]). Norms, perceived control abilities, and self-monitoring were confirmed in at least two studies (p<0.01 for each). Replication of findings across studies with a common design but varied populations provides a robust validation of the theory and processes of an effective intervention. Combined findings also demonstrate a means to substantiate process aspects and theoretical models to advance understanding of behavior change.

AB - Most behavior change trials focus on outcomes rather than deconstructing how those outcomes related to programmatic theoretical underpinnings and intervention components. In this report, the process of change is compared for three evidence-based programs’ that shared theories, intervention elements and potential mediating variables. Each investigation was a randomized trial that assessed pre- and post- intervention variables using survey constructs with established reliability. Each also used mediation analyses to define relationships. The findings were combined using a pattern matching approach. Surprisingly, knowledge was a significant mediator in each program (a and b path effects [p<0.01]). Norms, perceived control abilities, and self-monitoring were confirmed in at least two studies (p<0.01 for each). Replication of findings across studies with a common design but varied populations provides a robust validation of the theory and processes of an effective intervention. Combined findings also demonstrate a means to substantiate process aspects and theoretical models to advance understanding of behavior change.

KW - Behavior change

KW - Mediation

KW - Peer-led

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983527674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983527674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13142-015-0343-y

DO - 10.1007/s13142-015-0343-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 27528533

AN - SCOPUS:84983527674

VL - 6

SP - 449

EP - 456

JO - Translational Behavioral Medicine

JF - Translational Behavioral Medicine

SN - 1869-6716

IS - 3

ER -