Electrotactile stimulation on the tongue: Intensity perception, discrimination, and cross-modality estimation

Cecil A. Lozano, Kurt A. Kaczmarek, Marco Santello

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Due to its high sensitivity and conductivity, electrotactile stimulation (ETS) on the tongue has proven to be a useful and technically convenient tool to substitute and/or augment sensory capabilities. However, most of its applications have only provided spatial attributes and little is known about (a) the ability of the tongue's sensory system to process electrical stimuli of varying magnitudes and (b) how modulation of ETS intensity affects subjects' ability to decode stimulus intensity. We addressed these questions by quantifying: (1) the magnitude of the dynamic range (DR; maximal comfortable intensity/perception threshold) and its sensitivity to prolonged exposure; (2) subjects' ability to perceive intensity changes; and (3) subjects' ability to associate intensity with angular excursions of a protractor's handle. We found that the average DR (17 dB) was generally large in comparison with other tactile loci and of a relatively constant magnitude among subjects, even after prolonged exposure, despite a slight but significant upward drift (p < 0.001). Additionally, our results showed that as stimulus intensity increased, subjects' ability to discriminate ETS stimuli of different intensities improved (p < 0.05) while estimation accuracy, in general, slightly decreased (increasing underestimation). These results suggest that higher ETS intensity may increase recruitment of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptor fibers, as these are specialized for coding stimulus differences rather than absolute intensities. Furthermore, our study revealed that the tongue's sensory system can effectively convey electrical stimuli despite minimal practice and when information transfer is limited by memory and DR drift.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)50-63
Number of pages14
JournalSomatosensory and Motor Research
Volume26
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Tongue
Mechanoreceptors
Touch
Discrimination (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Dynamic range
  • Electrocutaneous
  • Human-machine interface
  • Psychophysics
  • Sensory augmentation
  • Sensory substitution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Electrotactile stimulation on the tongue : Intensity perception, discrimination, and cross-modality estimation. / Lozano, Cecil A.; Kaczmarek, Kurt A.; Santello, Marco.

In: Somatosensory and Motor Research, Vol. 26, No. 2-3, 06.2009, p. 50-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d1fb24b877c2432085c0bc63cd410845,
title = "Electrotactile stimulation on the tongue: Intensity perception, discrimination, and cross-modality estimation",
abstract = "Due to its high sensitivity and conductivity, electrotactile stimulation (ETS) on the tongue has proven to be a useful and technically convenient tool to substitute and/or augment sensory capabilities. However, most of its applications have only provided spatial attributes and little is known about (a) the ability of the tongue's sensory system to process electrical stimuli of varying magnitudes and (b) how modulation of ETS intensity affects subjects' ability to decode stimulus intensity. We addressed these questions by quantifying: (1) the magnitude of the dynamic range (DR; maximal comfortable intensity/perception threshold) and its sensitivity to prolonged exposure; (2) subjects' ability to perceive intensity changes; and (3) subjects' ability to associate intensity with angular excursions of a protractor's handle. We found that the average DR (17 dB) was generally large in comparison with other tactile loci and of a relatively constant magnitude among subjects, even after prolonged exposure, despite a slight but significant upward drift (p < 0.001). Additionally, our results showed that as stimulus intensity increased, subjects' ability to discriminate ETS stimuli of different intensities improved (p < 0.05) while estimation accuracy, in general, slightly decreased (increasing underestimation). These results suggest that higher ETS intensity may increase recruitment of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptor fibers, as these are specialized for coding stimulus differences rather than absolute intensities. Furthermore, our study revealed that the tongue's sensory system can effectively convey electrical stimuli despite minimal practice and when information transfer is limited by memory and DR drift.",
keywords = "Dynamic range, Electrocutaneous, Human-machine interface, Psychophysics, Sensory augmentation, Sensory substitution",
author = "Lozano, {Cecil A.} and Kaczmarek, {Kurt A.} and Marco Santello",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1080/08990220903158797",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "50--63",
journal = "Somatosensory Research",
issn = "0899-0220",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electrotactile stimulation on the tongue

T2 - Intensity perception, discrimination, and cross-modality estimation

AU - Lozano, Cecil A.

AU - Kaczmarek, Kurt A.

AU - Santello, Marco

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - Due to its high sensitivity and conductivity, electrotactile stimulation (ETS) on the tongue has proven to be a useful and technically convenient tool to substitute and/or augment sensory capabilities. However, most of its applications have only provided spatial attributes and little is known about (a) the ability of the tongue's sensory system to process electrical stimuli of varying magnitudes and (b) how modulation of ETS intensity affects subjects' ability to decode stimulus intensity. We addressed these questions by quantifying: (1) the magnitude of the dynamic range (DR; maximal comfortable intensity/perception threshold) and its sensitivity to prolonged exposure; (2) subjects' ability to perceive intensity changes; and (3) subjects' ability to associate intensity with angular excursions of a protractor's handle. We found that the average DR (17 dB) was generally large in comparison with other tactile loci and of a relatively constant magnitude among subjects, even after prolonged exposure, despite a slight but significant upward drift (p < 0.001). Additionally, our results showed that as stimulus intensity increased, subjects' ability to discriminate ETS stimuli of different intensities improved (p < 0.05) while estimation accuracy, in general, slightly decreased (increasing underestimation). These results suggest that higher ETS intensity may increase recruitment of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptor fibers, as these are specialized for coding stimulus differences rather than absolute intensities. Furthermore, our study revealed that the tongue's sensory system can effectively convey electrical stimuli despite minimal practice and when information transfer is limited by memory and DR drift.

AB - Due to its high sensitivity and conductivity, electrotactile stimulation (ETS) on the tongue has proven to be a useful and technically convenient tool to substitute and/or augment sensory capabilities. However, most of its applications have only provided spatial attributes and little is known about (a) the ability of the tongue's sensory system to process electrical stimuli of varying magnitudes and (b) how modulation of ETS intensity affects subjects' ability to decode stimulus intensity. We addressed these questions by quantifying: (1) the magnitude of the dynamic range (DR; maximal comfortable intensity/perception threshold) and its sensitivity to prolonged exposure; (2) subjects' ability to perceive intensity changes; and (3) subjects' ability to associate intensity with angular excursions of a protractor's handle. We found that the average DR (17 dB) was generally large in comparison with other tactile loci and of a relatively constant magnitude among subjects, even after prolonged exposure, despite a slight but significant upward drift (p < 0.001). Additionally, our results showed that as stimulus intensity increased, subjects' ability to discriminate ETS stimuli of different intensities improved (p < 0.05) while estimation accuracy, in general, slightly decreased (increasing underestimation). These results suggest that higher ETS intensity may increase recruitment of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptor fibers, as these are specialized for coding stimulus differences rather than absolute intensities. Furthermore, our study revealed that the tongue's sensory system can effectively convey electrical stimuli despite minimal practice and when information transfer is limited by memory and DR drift.

KW - Dynamic range

KW - Electrocutaneous

KW - Human-machine interface

KW - Psychophysics

KW - Sensory augmentation

KW - Sensory substitution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70249121804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70249121804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08990220903158797

DO - 10.1080/08990220903158797

M3 - Article

C2 - 19697262

AN - SCOPUS:70249121804

VL - 26

SP - 50

EP - 63

JO - Somatosensory Research

JF - Somatosensory Research

SN - 0899-0220

IS - 2-3

ER -