TY - JOUR
T1 - Electrotactile stimulation on the tongue
T2 - Intensity perception, discrimination, and cross-modality estimation
AU - Lozano, Cecil A.
AU - Kaczmarek, Kurt A.
AU - Santello, Marco
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge financial support from National Institutes of Health grants R01-EY10019 and R01-NS48903, the University of Wisconsin Robert Draper Technology Innovation Fund, the University of Wisconsin Industrial and Economic Development Research Fund, and the Charles E. Culpeper Foundation. Cecil Lozano was supported by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Mexico and the Department of Kinesiology at Arizona State University. The authors thank the members of the Neural Control of Movement Laboratory for their support and Dr Michael McBeath for advice on psychophysical analyses.
PY - 2009/6
Y1 - 2009/6
N2 - Due to its high sensitivity and conductivity, electrotactile stimulation (ETS) on the tongue has proven to be a useful and technically convenient tool to substitute and/or augment sensory capabilities. However, most of its applications have only provided spatial attributes and little is known about (a) the ability of the tongue's sensory system to process electrical stimuli of varying magnitudes and (b) how modulation of ETS intensity affects subjects' ability to decode stimulus intensity. We addressed these questions by quantifying: (1) the magnitude of the dynamic range (DR; maximal comfortable intensity/perception threshold) and its sensitivity to prolonged exposure; (2) subjects' ability to perceive intensity changes; and (3) subjects' ability to associate intensity with angular excursions of a protractor's handle. We found that the average DR (17 dB) was generally large in comparison with other tactile loci and of a relatively constant magnitude among subjects, even after prolonged exposure, despite a slight but significant upward drift (p < 0.001). Additionally, our results showed that as stimulus intensity increased, subjects' ability to discriminate ETS stimuli of different intensities improved (p < 0.05) while estimation accuracy, in general, slightly decreased (increasing underestimation). These results suggest that higher ETS intensity may increase recruitment of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptor fibers, as these are specialized for coding stimulus differences rather than absolute intensities. Furthermore, our study revealed that the tongue's sensory system can effectively convey electrical stimuli despite minimal practice and when information transfer is limited by memory and DR drift.
AB - Due to its high sensitivity and conductivity, electrotactile stimulation (ETS) on the tongue has proven to be a useful and technically convenient tool to substitute and/or augment sensory capabilities. However, most of its applications have only provided spatial attributes and little is known about (a) the ability of the tongue's sensory system to process electrical stimuli of varying magnitudes and (b) how modulation of ETS intensity affects subjects' ability to decode stimulus intensity. We addressed these questions by quantifying: (1) the magnitude of the dynamic range (DR; maximal comfortable intensity/perception threshold) and its sensitivity to prolonged exposure; (2) subjects' ability to perceive intensity changes; and (3) subjects' ability to associate intensity with angular excursions of a protractor's handle. We found that the average DR (17 dB) was generally large in comparison with other tactile loci and of a relatively constant magnitude among subjects, even after prolonged exposure, despite a slight but significant upward drift (p < 0.001). Additionally, our results showed that as stimulus intensity increased, subjects' ability to discriminate ETS stimuli of different intensities improved (p < 0.05) while estimation accuracy, in general, slightly decreased (increasing underestimation). These results suggest that higher ETS intensity may increase recruitment of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptor fibers, as these are specialized for coding stimulus differences rather than absolute intensities. Furthermore, our study revealed that the tongue's sensory system can effectively convey electrical stimuli despite minimal practice and when information transfer is limited by memory and DR drift.
KW - Dynamic range
KW - Electrocutaneous
KW - Human-machine interface
KW - Psychophysics
KW - Sensory augmentation
KW - Sensory substitution
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70249121804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70249121804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08990220903158797
DO - 10.1080/08990220903158797
M3 - Article
C2 - 19697262
AN - SCOPUS:70249121804
SN - 0899-0220
VL - 26
SP - 50
EP - 63
JO - Somatosensory Research
JF - Somatosensory Research
IS - 2-3
ER -