Efficiency of visual feedback integration differs between dominant and non-dominant arms during a reaching task

Gregory A. Apker, Keith Dyson, Garrett Frantz, Christopher Buneo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that patterns of endpoint variability following double-step reach sequences reflect the influence of both planning and execution-related processes, but are strongly dominated by noise associated with the online updating of movement plans based on visual feedback. However, it is currently unclear whether these results reflect the dominant arm/hemisphere’s postulated specialization for visual feedback processing, or whether these effects reflect a more general “arm/hemisphere independent” preference for visual feedback in the control of reaching. To explore this, twelve subjects performed double-step reach sequences with their dominant and non-dominant arms to targets in 3D space with and without visual feedback of the arm. Variability was quantified using the volumes, aspect ratios, and orientations of 95 % confidence ellipsoids fit to the distributions of reach endpoints. In consonance with previous findings, the availability of visual feedback resulted in ellipsoids that were significantly smaller, had greater aspect ratios, and were more aligned with the depth axis than those performed without visual feedback. Moreover, the effects of vision on aspect ratio and orientation were similar in magnitude for the dominant and non-dominant arms, suggesting that noise associated with planning and execution-related processes is managed in a similar way by the sensorimotor systems of each arm. However, the degree to which vision decreased ellipsoid volume was found to be significantly greater for the dominant arm. This suggests that the feedback control system of the dominant arm uses visual information more efficiently to control reaches to visual targets.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)317-327
Number of pages11
JournalExperimental Brain Research
Volume233
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Sensory Feedback
Noise

Keywords

  • Execution
  • Planning
  • Proprioception
  • Variability
  • Vision

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Efficiency of visual feedback integration differs between dominant and non-dominant arms during a reaching task. / Apker, Gregory A.; Dyson, Keith; Frantz, Garrett; Buneo, Christopher.

In: Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 233, No. 1, 2014, p. 317-327.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f4a1144bb7954acf9ba35e82eaac8a68,
title = "Efficiency of visual feedback integration differs between dominant and non-dominant arms during a reaching task",
abstract = "Recent studies have shown that patterns of endpoint variability following double-step reach sequences reflect the influence of both planning and execution-related processes, but are strongly dominated by noise associated with the online updating of movement plans based on visual feedback. However, it is currently unclear whether these results reflect the dominant arm/hemisphere’s postulated specialization for visual feedback processing, or whether these effects reflect a more general “arm/hemisphere independent” preference for visual feedback in the control of reaching. To explore this, twelve subjects performed double-step reach sequences with their dominant and non-dominant arms to targets in 3D space with and without visual feedback of the arm. Variability was quantified using the volumes, aspect ratios, and orientations of 95 {\%} confidence ellipsoids fit to the distributions of reach endpoints. In consonance with previous findings, the availability of visual feedback resulted in ellipsoids that were significantly smaller, had greater aspect ratios, and were more aligned with the depth axis than those performed without visual feedback. Moreover, the effects of vision on aspect ratio and orientation were similar in magnitude for the dominant and non-dominant arms, suggesting that noise associated with planning and execution-related processes is managed in a similar way by the sensorimotor systems of each arm. However, the degree to which vision decreased ellipsoid volume was found to be significantly greater for the dominant arm. This suggests that the feedback control system of the dominant arm uses visual information more efficiently to control reaches to visual targets.",
keywords = "Execution, Planning, Proprioception, Variability, Vision",
author = "Apker, {Gregory A.} and Keith Dyson and Garrett Frantz and Christopher Buneo",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s00221-014-4116-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "233",
pages = "317--327",
journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficiency of visual feedback integration differs between dominant and non-dominant arms during a reaching task

AU - Apker, Gregory A.

AU - Dyson, Keith

AU - Frantz, Garrett

AU - Buneo, Christopher

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Recent studies have shown that patterns of endpoint variability following double-step reach sequences reflect the influence of both planning and execution-related processes, but are strongly dominated by noise associated with the online updating of movement plans based on visual feedback. However, it is currently unclear whether these results reflect the dominant arm/hemisphere’s postulated specialization for visual feedback processing, or whether these effects reflect a more general “arm/hemisphere independent” preference for visual feedback in the control of reaching. To explore this, twelve subjects performed double-step reach sequences with their dominant and non-dominant arms to targets in 3D space with and without visual feedback of the arm. Variability was quantified using the volumes, aspect ratios, and orientations of 95 % confidence ellipsoids fit to the distributions of reach endpoints. In consonance with previous findings, the availability of visual feedback resulted in ellipsoids that were significantly smaller, had greater aspect ratios, and were more aligned with the depth axis than those performed without visual feedback. Moreover, the effects of vision on aspect ratio and orientation were similar in magnitude for the dominant and non-dominant arms, suggesting that noise associated with planning and execution-related processes is managed in a similar way by the sensorimotor systems of each arm. However, the degree to which vision decreased ellipsoid volume was found to be significantly greater for the dominant arm. This suggests that the feedback control system of the dominant arm uses visual information more efficiently to control reaches to visual targets.

AB - Recent studies have shown that patterns of endpoint variability following double-step reach sequences reflect the influence of both planning and execution-related processes, but are strongly dominated by noise associated with the online updating of movement plans based on visual feedback. However, it is currently unclear whether these results reflect the dominant arm/hemisphere’s postulated specialization for visual feedback processing, or whether these effects reflect a more general “arm/hemisphere independent” preference for visual feedback in the control of reaching. To explore this, twelve subjects performed double-step reach sequences with their dominant and non-dominant arms to targets in 3D space with and without visual feedback of the arm. Variability was quantified using the volumes, aspect ratios, and orientations of 95 % confidence ellipsoids fit to the distributions of reach endpoints. In consonance with previous findings, the availability of visual feedback resulted in ellipsoids that were significantly smaller, had greater aspect ratios, and were more aligned with the depth axis than those performed without visual feedback. Moreover, the effects of vision on aspect ratio and orientation were similar in magnitude for the dominant and non-dominant arms, suggesting that noise associated with planning and execution-related processes is managed in a similar way by the sensorimotor systems of each arm. However, the degree to which vision decreased ellipsoid volume was found to be significantly greater for the dominant arm. This suggests that the feedback control system of the dominant arm uses visual information more efficiently to control reaches to visual targets.

KW - Execution

KW - Planning

KW - Proprioception

KW - Variability

KW - Vision

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922079780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922079780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00221-014-4116-5

DO - 10.1007/s00221-014-4116-5

M3 - Article

VL - 233

SP - 317

EP - 327

JO - Experimental Brain Research

JF - Experimental Brain Research

SN - 0014-4819

IS - 1

ER -