Effects of vegetation structure on the location of lion kill sites in African thicket

Andrew B. Davies, Craig J. Tambling, Graham I.H. Kerley, Gregory P. Asner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Predator-prey relationships are integral to ecosystem stability and functioning. These relationships are, however, difficult to maintain in protected areas where large predators are increasingly being reintroduced and confined. Where predators make kills has a profound influence on their role in ecosystems, but the relative importance of environmental variables in determining kill sites, and how these might vary across ecosystems is poorly known. We investigated kill sites for lions in South Africa's thicket biome, testing the importance of vegetation structure for kill site locations compared to other environmental variables. Kill sites were located over four years using GPS telemetry and compared to non-kill sites that had been occupied by lions, as well as to random sites within lion ranges. Measurements of 3D vegetation structure obtained from Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) were used to calculate the visible area (viewshed) around each site and, along with wind and moonlight data, used to compare kill sites between lion sexes, prey species and prey sexes. Viewshed area was the most important predictor of kill sites (sites in dense vegetation were twice as likely to be kill sites compared to open areas), followed by wind speed and, less so, moonlight. Kill sites for different prey species varied with vegetation structure, and male prey were killed when wind speeds were higher compared to female prey of the same species. Our results demonstrate that vegetation structure is an important component of predatorprey interactions, with varying effects across ecosystems. Such differences require consideration in terms of the ecological roles performed by predators, and in predator and prey conservation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0149098
JournalPloS one
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Lions
Panthera leo
vegetation structure
Ecosystem
Ecosystems
ecosystems
predators
wind speed
lidar
Telemetry
environmental factors
gender
predator-prey relationships
Telemetering
telemetry
South Africa
Global positioning system
Conservation
conservation areas
Light

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Effects of vegetation structure on the location of lion kill sites in African thicket. / Davies, Andrew B.; Tambling, Craig J.; Kerley, Graham I.H.; Asner, Gregory P.

In: PloS one, Vol. 11, No. 2, e0149098, 02.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Davies, Andrew B. ; Tambling, Craig J. ; Kerley, Graham I.H. ; Asner, Gregory P. / Effects of vegetation structure on the location of lion kill sites in African thicket. In: PloS one. 2016 ; Vol. 11, No. 2.
@article{4ff1fb97c69b44948324a9ee38cba063,
title = "Effects of vegetation structure on the location of lion kill sites in African thicket",
abstract = "Predator-prey relationships are integral to ecosystem stability and functioning. These relationships are, however, difficult to maintain in protected areas where large predators are increasingly being reintroduced and confined. Where predators make kills has a profound influence on their role in ecosystems, but the relative importance of environmental variables in determining kill sites, and how these might vary across ecosystems is poorly known. We investigated kill sites for lions in South Africa's thicket biome, testing the importance of vegetation structure for kill site locations compared to other environmental variables. Kill sites were located over four years using GPS telemetry and compared to non-kill sites that had been occupied by lions, as well as to random sites within lion ranges. Measurements of 3D vegetation structure obtained from Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) were used to calculate the visible area (viewshed) around each site and, along with wind and moonlight data, used to compare kill sites between lion sexes, prey species and prey sexes. Viewshed area was the most important predictor of kill sites (sites in dense vegetation were twice as likely to be kill sites compared to open areas), followed by wind speed and, less so, moonlight. Kill sites for different prey species varied with vegetation structure, and male prey were killed when wind speeds were higher compared to female prey of the same species. Our results demonstrate that vegetation structure is an important component of predatorprey interactions, with varying effects across ecosystems. Such differences require consideration in terms of the ecological roles performed by predators, and in predator and prey conservation.",
author = "Davies, {Andrew B.} and Tambling, {Craig J.} and Kerley, {Graham I.H.} and Asner, {Gregory P.}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0149098",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of vegetation structure on the location of lion kill sites in African thicket

AU - Davies, Andrew B.

AU - Tambling, Craig J.

AU - Kerley, Graham I.H.

AU - Asner, Gregory P.

PY - 2016/2

Y1 - 2016/2

N2 - Predator-prey relationships are integral to ecosystem stability and functioning. These relationships are, however, difficult to maintain in protected areas where large predators are increasingly being reintroduced and confined. Where predators make kills has a profound influence on their role in ecosystems, but the relative importance of environmental variables in determining kill sites, and how these might vary across ecosystems is poorly known. We investigated kill sites for lions in South Africa's thicket biome, testing the importance of vegetation structure for kill site locations compared to other environmental variables. Kill sites were located over four years using GPS telemetry and compared to non-kill sites that had been occupied by lions, as well as to random sites within lion ranges. Measurements of 3D vegetation structure obtained from Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) were used to calculate the visible area (viewshed) around each site and, along with wind and moonlight data, used to compare kill sites between lion sexes, prey species and prey sexes. Viewshed area was the most important predictor of kill sites (sites in dense vegetation were twice as likely to be kill sites compared to open areas), followed by wind speed and, less so, moonlight. Kill sites for different prey species varied with vegetation structure, and male prey were killed when wind speeds were higher compared to female prey of the same species. Our results demonstrate that vegetation structure is an important component of predatorprey interactions, with varying effects across ecosystems. Such differences require consideration in terms of the ecological roles performed by predators, and in predator and prey conservation.

AB - Predator-prey relationships are integral to ecosystem stability and functioning. These relationships are, however, difficult to maintain in protected areas where large predators are increasingly being reintroduced and confined. Where predators make kills has a profound influence on their role in ecosystems, but the relative importance of environmental variables in determining kill sites, and how these might vary across ecosystems is poorly known. We investigated kill sites for lions in South Africa's thicket biome, testing the importance of vegetation structure for kill site locations compared to other environmental variables. Kill sites were located over four years using GPS telemetry and compared to non-kill sites that had been occupied by lions, as well as to random sites within lion ranges. Measurements of 3D vegetation structure obtained from Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) were used to calculate the visible area (viewshed) around each site and, along with wind and moonlight data, used to compare kill sites between lion sexes, prey species and prey sexes. Viewshed area was the most important predictor of kill sites (sites in dense vegetation were twice as likely to be kill sites compared to open areas), followed by wind speed and, less so, moonlight. Kill sites for different prey species varied with vegetation structure, and male prey were killed when wind speeds were higher compared to female prey of the same species. Our results demonstrate that vegetation structure is an important component of predatorprey interactions, with varying effects across ecosystems. Such differences require consideration in terms of the ecological roles performed by predators, and in predator and prey conservation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962514253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962514253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0149098

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0149098

M3 - Article

C2 - 26910832

AN - SCOPUS:84962514253

VL - 11

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 2

M1 - e0149098

ER -