Effects of Self-Affirmation on Daily Versus Occasional Smokers’ Responses to Graphic Warning Labels

Xiaoquan Zhao, Emily B. Peterson, Wonsun Kim, Justin Rolfe-Redding

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is growing evidence that self-affirmation can reduce defensive processing of threatening health messages among high risk individuals. However, how self-affirmation might influence low risk individuals is less clear. This study examined the effect of self-affirmation on daily versus occasional smokers’ reactions to graphic on-pack warning labels. Results showed a relatively consistent pattern of interaction wherein self-affirmation decreased favorable reactions to the warning labels among occasional smokers, whereas its effect on daily smokers was mostly nonsignificant. Potential explanations of these findings are offered and their practical implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1137-1158
Number of pages22
JournalCommunication Research
Volume41
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 27 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Labels
Health
interaction
Processing
health
evidence
Affirmation
Warning

Keywords

  • self-affirmation
  • smoking
  • warning labels

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Effects of Self-Affirmation on Daily Versus Occasional Smokers’ Responses to Graphic Warning Labels. / Zhao, Xiaoquan; Peterson, Emily B.; Kim, Wonsun; Rolfe-Redding, Justin.

In: Communication Research, Vol. 41, No. 8, 27.12.2014, p. 1137-1158.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zhao, Xiaoquan ; Peterson, Emily B. ; Kim, Wonsun ; Rolfe-Redding, Justin. / Effects of Self-Affirmation on Daily Versus Occasional Smokers’ Responses to Graphic Warning Labels. In: Communication Research. 2014 ; Vol. 41, No. 8. pp. 1137-1158.
@article{9dd64f1ef1104d7eb445e50e8bf77bdd,
title = "Effects of Self-Affirmation on Daily Versus Occasional Smokers’ Responses to Graphic Warning Labels",
abstract = "There is growing evidence that self-affirmation can reduce defensive processing of threatening health messages among high risk individuals. However, how self-affirmation might influence low risk individuals is less clear. This study examined the effect of self-affirmation on daily versus occasional smokers’ reactions to graphic on-pack warning labels. Results showed a relatively consistent pattern of interaction wherein self-affirmation decreased favorable reactions to the warning labels among occasional smokers, whereas its effect on daily smokers was mostly nonsignificant. Potential explanations of these findings are offered and their practical implications are discussed.",
keywords = "self-affirmation, smoking, warning labels",
author = "Xiaoquan Zhao and Peterson, {Emily B.} and Wonsun Kim and Justin Rolfe-Redding",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1177/0093650212465433",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "1137--1158",
journal = "Communication Research",
issn = "0093-6502",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of Self-Affirmation on Daily Versus Occasional Smokers’ Responses to Graphic Warning Labels

AU - Zhao, Xiaoquan

AU - Peterson, Emily B.

AU - Kim, Wonsun

AU - Rolfe-Redding, Justin

PY - 2014/12/27

Y1 - 2014/12/27

N2 - There is growing evidence that self-affirmation can reduce defensive processing of threatening health messages among high risk individuals. However, how self-affirmation might influence low risk individuals is less clear. This study examined the effect of self-affirmation on daily versus occasional smokers’ reactions to graphic on-pack warning labels. Results showed a relatively consistent pattern of interaction wherein self-affirmation decreased favorable reactions to the warning labels among occasional smokers, whereas its effect on daily smokers was mostly nonsignificant. Potential explanations of these findings are offered and their practical implications are discussed.

AB - There is growing evidence that self-affirmation can reduce defensive processing of threatening health messages among high risk individuals. However, how self-affirmation might influence low risk individuals is less clear. This study examined the effect of self-affirmation on daily versus occasional smokers’ reactions to graphic on-pack warning labels. Results showed a relatively consistent pattern of interaction wherein self-affirmation decreased favorable reactions to the warning labels among occasional smokers, whereas its effect on daily smokers was mostly nonsignificant. Potential explanations of these findings are offered and their practical implications are discussed.

KW - self-affirmation

KW - smoking

KW - warning labels

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911969332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84911969332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0093650212465433

DO - 10.1177/0093650212465433

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84911969332

VL - 41

SP - 1137

EP - 1158

JO - Communication Research

JF - Communication Research

SN - 0093-6502

IS - 8

ER -