Effects of Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia Biofeedback Versus Passive Biofeedback Control

Leslie Sherlin, Richard Gevirtz, Sarah Wyckoff, Fred Muench

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the acute effects of a portable respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) biofeedback device as compared to passive biofeedback control on state anxiety, heart rate (HR), and Stroop task (Congedo, 2003) performance during repeated administration of the Stroop task cognitive stressor in a single brief session. Participants were individuals reporting stress levels at least 1 SD above the mean on the Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen, Kamarck, & Mermelstein, 1983). The RSA group had significantly reduced HR compared to the control group at postintervention and Stressor 2. Both groups significantly improved Stroop scores. Together, these preliminary results suggest that brief relaxation training can reduce state anxiety but that RSA biofeedback appears to have added benefits in reducing state anxiety and HR stress reactivity compared to passive relaxation techniques.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)233-248
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Stress Management
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Anxiety
Heart Rate
anxiety
Relaxation Therapy
Group
Equipment and Supplies
Control Groups
performance
Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia
Biofeedback (Psychology)
Stressors
Reactivity

Keywords

  • anxiety
  • biofeedback
  • respiratory sinus arrhythmia
  • stress reactivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Effects of Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia Biofeedback Versus Passive Biofeedback Control. / Sherlin, Leslie; Gevirtz, Richard; Wyckoff, Sarah; Muench, Fred.

In: International Journal of Stress Management, Vol. 16, No. 3, 01.08.2009, p. 233-248.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{35732227d0c64704b6aab84ecceb952c,
title = "Effects of Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia Biofeedback Versus Passive Biofeedback Control",
abstract = "The objective of this study was to examine the acute effects of a portable respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) biofeedback device as compared to passive biofeedback control on state anxiety, heart rate (HR), and Stroop task (Congedo, 2003) performance during repeated administration of the Stroop task cognitive stressor in a single brief session. Participants were individuals reporting stress levels at least 1 SD above the mean on the Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen, Kamarck, & Mermelstein, 1983). The RSA group had significantly reduced HR compared to the control group at postintervention and Stressor 2. Both groups significantly improved Stroop scores. Together, these preliminary results suggest that brief relaxation training can reduce state anxiety but that RSA biofeedback appears to have added benefits in reducing state anxiety and HR stress reactivity compared to passive relaxation techniques.",
keywords = "anxiety, biofeedback, respiratory sinus arrhythmia, stress reactivity",
author = "Leslie Sherlin and Richard Gevirtz and Sarah Wyckoff and Fred Muench",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0016047",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "233--248",
journal = "International Journal of Stress Management",
issn = "1072-5245",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia Biofeedback Versus Passive Biofeedback Control

AU - Sherlin, Leslie

AU - Gevirtz, Richard

AU - Wyckoff, Sarah

AU - Muench, Fred

PY - 2009/8/1

Y1 - 2009/8/1

N2 - The objective of this study was to examine the acute effects of a portable respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) biofeedback device as compared to passive biofeedback control on state anxiety, heart rate (HR), and Stroop task (Congedo, 2003) performance during repeated administration of the Stroop task cognitive stressor in a single brief session. Participants were individuals reporting stress levels at least 1 SD above the mean on the Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen, Kamarck, & Mermelstein, 1983). The RSA group had significantly reduced HR compared to the control group at postintervention and Stressor 2. Both groups significantly improved Stroop scores. Together, these preliminary results suggest that brief relaxation training can reduce state anxiety but that RSA biofeedback appears to have added benefits in reducing state anxiety and HR stress reactivity compared to passive relaxation techniques.

AB - The objective of this study was to examine the acute effects of a portable respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) biofeedback device as compared to passive biofeedback control on state anxiety, heart rate (HR), and Stroop task (Congedo, 2003) performance during repeated administration of the Stroop task cognitive stressor in a single brief session. Participants were individuals reporting stress levels at least 1 SD above the mean on the Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen, Kamarck, & Mermelstein, 1983). The RSA group had significantly reduced HR compared to the control group at postintervention and Stressor 2. Both groups significantly improved Stroop scores. Together, these preliminary results suggest that brief relaxation training can reduce state anxiety but that RSA biofeedback appears to have added benefits in reducing state anxiety and HR stress reactivity compared to passive relaxation techniques.

KW - anxiety

KW - biofeedback

KW - respiratory sinus arrhythmia

KW - stress reactivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68949215036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68949215036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0016047

DO - 10.1037/a0016047

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:68949215036

VL - 16

SP - 233

EP - 248

JO - International Journal of Stress Management

JF - International Journal of Stress Management

SN - 1072-5245

IS - 3

ER -