Effects of load type (pollen or nectar) and load mass on hovering metabolic rate and mechanical power output in the honey bee Apis mellifera

Erica Feuerbacher, Jennifer Fewell, Stephen P. Roberts, Elizabeth F. Smith, Jon Harrison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study we tested the effect of pollen and nectar loading on metabolic rate (in mW) and wingbeat frequency during hovering, and also examined the effect of pollen loading on wing kinematics and mechanical power output. Pollen foragers had hovering metabolic rates approximately 10% higher than nectar foragers, regardless of the amount of load carried. Pollen foragers also had a more horizontal body position and higher inclination of stroke plane than measured previously for honey bees (probably nectar foragers). Thorax temperatures ranked pollen > nectar > water foragers, and higher flight metabolic rate could explain the higher thorax temperature of pollen foragers. Load mass did not affect hovering metabolic rate or wingbeat frequency in a regression-model experiment. However, using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) design, loaded pollen and nectar foragers (mean loads 27% and 40% of body mass, respectively) significantly increased metabolic rate by 6%. Mean pollen loads of 18% of body mass had no effect on wingbeat frequency, stroke amplitude, body angle or inclination of stroke plane, but increased the calculated mechanical power output by 16-18% (depending on the method of estimating drag). A rise in lift coefficient as bees carry loads without increasing wingbeat frequency or stroke amplitude (and only minimal increases in metabolic rate) suggests an increased use of unsteady power-generating mechanisms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1855-1865
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Experimental Biology
Volume206
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2003

Fingerprint

Plant Nectar
Honey
Bees
honey
nectar
Pollen
Apis mellifera
bee
honey bees
pollen
stroke
thorax
body mass
Thorax
Stroke
Temperature
rate
effect
kinematics
Biomechanical Phenomena

Keywords

  • Apis mellifera
  • Flight metabolism
  • Honey bee
  • Insect
  • Loading
  • Power output
  • Wing kinematics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Effects of load type (pollen or nectar) and load mass on hovering metabolic rate and mechanical power output in the honey bee Apis mellifera. / Feuerbacher, Erica; Fewell, Jennifer; Roberts, Stephen P.; Smith, Elizabeth F.; Harrison, Jon.

In: Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol. 206, No. 11, 06.2003, p. 1855-1865.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{59ccf93a959e4c4da20f61754fccf7f8,
title = "Effects of load type (pollen or nectar) and load mass on hovering metabolic rate and mechanical power output in the honey bee Apis mellifera",
abstract = "In this study we tested the effect of pollen and nectar loading on metabolic rate (in mW) and wingbeat frequency during hovering, and also examined the effect of pollen loading on wing kinematics and mechanical power output. Pollen foragers had hovering metabolic rates approximately 10{\%} higher than nectar foragers, regardless of the amount of load carried. Pollen foragers also had a more horizontal body position and higher inclination of stroke plane than measured previously for honey bees (probably nectar foragers). Thorax temperatures ranked pollen > nectar > water foragers, and higher flight metabolic rate could explain the higher thorax temperature of pollen foragers. Load mass did not affect hovering metabolic rate or wingbeat frequency in a regression-model experiment. However, using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) design, loaded pollen and nectar foragers (mean loads 27{\%} and 40{\%} of body mass, respectively) significantly increased metabolic rate by 6{\%}. Mean pollen loads of 18{\%} of body mass had no effect on wingbeat frequency, stroke amplitude, body angle or inclination of stroke plane, but increased the calculated mechanical power output by 16-18{\%} (depending on the method of estimating drag). A rise in lift coefficient as bees carry loads without increasing wingbeat frequency or stroke amplitude (and only minimal increases in metabolic rate) suggests an increased use of unsteady power-generating mechanisms.",
keywords = "Apis mellifera, Flight metabolism, Honey bee, Insect, Loading, Power output, Wing kinematics",
author = "Erica Feuerbacher and Jennifer Fewell and Roberts, {Stephen P.} and Smith, {Elizabeth F.} and Jon Harrison",
year = "2003",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1242/jeb.00347",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "206",
pages = "1855--1865",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Biology",
issn = "0022-0949",
publisher = "Company of Biologists Ltd",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of load type (pollen or nectar) and load mass on hovering metabolic rate and mechanical power output in the honey bee Apis mellifera

AU - Feuerbacher, Erica

AU - Fewell, Jennifer

AU - Roberts, Stephen P.

AU - Smith, Elizabeth F.

AU - Harrison, Jon

PY - 2003/6

Y1 - 2003/6

N2 - In this study we tested the effect of pollen and nectar loading on metabolic rate (in mW) and wingbeat frequency during hovering, and also examined the effect of pollen loading on wing kinematics and mechanical power output. Pollen foragers had hovering metabolic rates approximately 10% higher than nectar foragers, regardless of the amount of load carried. Pollen foragers also had a more horizontal body position and higher inclination of stroke plane than measured previously for honey bees (probably nectar foragers). Thorax temperatures ranked pollen > nectar > water foragers, and higher flight metabolic rate could explain the higher thorax temperature of pollen foragers. Load mass did not affect hovering metabolic rate or wingbeat frequency in a regression-model experiment. However, using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) design, loaded pollen and nectar foragers (mean loads 27% and 40% of body mass, respectively) significantly increased metabolic rate by 6%. Mean pollen loads of 18% of body mass had no effect on wingbeat frequency, stroke amplitude, body angle or inclination of stroke plane, but increased the calculated mechanical power output by 16-18% (depending on the method of estimating drag). A rise in lift coefficient as bees carry loads without increasing wingbeat frequency or stroke amplitude (and only minimal increases in metabolic rate) suggests an increased use of unsteady power-generating mechanisms.

AB - In this study we tested the effect of pollen and nectar loading on metabolic rate (in mW) and wingbeat frequency during hovering, and also examined the effect of pollen loading on wing kinematics and mechanical power output. Pollen foragers had hovering metabolic rates approximately 10% higher than nectar foragers, regardless of the amount of load carried. Pollen foragers also had a more horizontal body position and higher inclination of stroke plane than measured previously for honey bees (probably nectar foragers). Thorax temperatures ranked pollen > nectar > water foragers, and higher flight metabolic rate could explain the higher thorax temperature of pollen foragers. Load mass did not affect hovering metabolic rate or wingbeat frequency in a regression-model experiment. However, using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) design, loaded pollen and nectar foragers (mean loads 27% and 40% of body mass, respectively) significantly increased metabolic rate by 6%. Mean pollen loads of 18% of body mass had no effect on wingbeat frequency, stroke amplitude, body angle or inclination of stroke plane, but increased the calculated mechanical power output by 16-18% (depending on the method of estimating drag). A rise in lift coefficient as bees carry loads without increasing wingbeat frequency or stroke amplitude (and only minimal increases in metabolic rate) suggests an increased use of unsteady power-generating mechanisms.

KW - Apis mellifera

KW - Flight metabolism

KW - Honey bee

KW - Insect

KW - Loading

KW - Power output

KW - Wing kinematics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038120900&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038120900&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1242/jeb.00347

DO - 10.1242/jeb.00347

M3 - Article

VL - 206

SP - 1855

EP - 1865

JO - Journal of Experimental Biology

JF - Journal of Experimental Biology

SN - 0022-0949

IS - 11

ER -