Effects of freezing of gait on postural motor learning in people with Parkinson's disease

Daniel Peterson, F. B. Horak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Protective postural responses, including stepping, to recover equilibrium are critical for fall prevention and are impaired in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) with freezing of gait (FoG). Improving protective postural responses through training may reduce falls in this population. However, motor learning, the basis of neurorehabilitation, is also impaired in people with PD and, in particular, people with PD who experience freezing. It is unknown whether people with PD who freeze can improve protective postural responses, and whether these improvements are similar to nonfreezers. Our goal was to assess whether people with freezing can improve protective postural responses and retain these improvements similarly to nonfreezers. Twenty-eight people with PD (13 freezers, 15 nonfreezers) were enrolled. Improvement in protective postural responses was assessed over the course of 25 forward and 25 backward support surface translations (delivered in pseudo-random order). Postural responses were re-assessed 24 h later to determine whether improvements were retained. People who freeze did not improve or retain improvement in protective postural responses as well as nonfreezers in our primary outcome variable, center of mass (COM) displacement after perturbations (post hoc across group assessments: freezers- p = 0.14 and nonfreezers- p = 0.001, respectively). However, other protective stepping outcomes, including margin of stability, step length, and step time, improved similarly across groups. Significant improvements were retained in both groups. In conclusion, people with PD who freeze exhibited reduced ability to improve protective postural responses in some, but not all, outcome variables. Additional training may be necessary to improve protective postural responses in people with PD who freeze.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-289
Number of pages7
JournalNeuroscience
Volume334
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 15 2016

Fingerprint

Gait
Freezing
Parkinson Disease
Learning
Aptitude
Population

Keywords

  • freezing of gait
  • motor learning
  • Parkinson's disease
  • posture
  • stepping

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Effects of freezing of gait on postural motor learning in people with Parkinson's disease. / Peterson, Daniel; Horak, F. B.

In: Neuroscience, Vol. 334, 15.10.2016, p. 283-289.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9f1a95686f684b1b8de3c6f90681fa8a,
title = "Effects of freezing of gait on postural motor learning in people with Parkinson's disease",
abstract = "Protective postural responses, including stepping, to recover equilibrium are critical for fall prevention and are impaired in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) with freezing of gait (FoG). Improving protective postural responses through training may reduce falls in this population. However, motor learning, the basis of neurorehabilitation, is also impaired in people with PD and, in particular, people with PD who experience freezing. It is unknown whether people with PD who freeze can improve protective postural responses, and whether these improvements are similar to nonfreezers. Our goal was to assess whether people with freezing can improve protective postural responses and retain these improvements similarly to nonfreezers. Twenty-eight people with PD (13 freezers, 15 nonfreezers) were enrolled. Improvement in protective postural responses was assessed over the course of 25 forward and 25 backward support surface translations (delivered in pseudo-random order). Postural responses were re-assessed 24 h later to determine whether improvements were retained. People who freeze did not improve or retain improvement in protective postural responses as well as nonfreezers in our primary outcome variable, center of mass (COM) displacement after perturbations (post hoc across group assessments: freezers- p = 0.14 and nonfreezers- p = 0.001, respectively). However, other protective stepping outcomes, including margin of stability, step length, and step time, improved similarly across groups. Significant improvements were retained in both groups. In conclusion, people with PD who freeze exhibited reduced ability to improve protective postural responses in some, but not all, outcome variables. Additional training may be necessary to improve protective postural responses in people with PD who freeze.",
keywords = "freezing of gait, motor learning, Parkinson's disease, posture, stepping",
author = "Daniel Peterson and Horak, {F. B.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.08.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "334",
pages = "283--289",
journal = "Neuroscience",
issn = "0306-4522",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of freezing of gait on postural motor learning in people with Parkinson's disease

AU - Peterson, Daniel

AU - Horak, F. B.

PY - 2016/10/15

Y1 - 2016/10/15

N2 - Protective postural responses, including stepping, to recover equilibrium are critical for fall prevention and are impaired in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) with freezing of gait (FoG). Improving protective postural responses through training may reduce falls in this population. However, motor learning, the basis of neurorehabilitation, is also impaired in people with PD and, in particular, people with PD who experience freezing. It is unknown whether people with PD who freeze can improve protective postural responses, and whether these improvements are similar to nonfreezers. Our goal was to assess whether people with freezing can improve protective postural responses and retain these improvements similarly to nonfreezers. Twenty-eight people with PD (13 freezers, 15 nonfreezers) were enrolled. Improvement in protective postural responses was assessed over the course of 25 forward and 25 backward support surface translations (delivered in pseudo-random order). Postural responses were re-assessed 24 h later to determine whether improvements were retained. People who freeze did not improve or retain improvement in protective postural responses as well as nonfreezers in our primary outcome variable, center of mass (COM) displacement after perturbations (post hoc across group assessments: freezers- p = 0.14 and nonfreezers- p = 0.001, respectively). However, other protective stepping outcomes, including margin of stability, step length, and step time, improved similarly across groups. Significant improvements were retained in both groups. In conclusion, people with PD who freeze exhibited reduced ability to improve protective postural responses in some, but not all, outcome variables. Additional training may be necessary to improve protective postural responses in people with PD who freeze.

AB - Protective postural responses, including stepping, to recover equilibrium are critical for fall prevention and are impaired in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) with freezing of gait (FoG). Improving protective postural responses through training may reduce falls in this population. However, motor learning, the basis of neurorehabilitation, is also impaired in people with PD and, in particular, people with PD who experience freezing. It is unknown whether people with PD who freeze can improve protective postural responses, and whether these improvements are similar to nonfreezers. Our goal was to assess whether people with freezing can improve protective postural responses and retain these improvements similarly to nonfreezers. Twenty-eight people with PD (13 freezers, 15 nonfreezers) were enrolled. Improvement in protective postural responses was assessed over the course of 25 forward and 25 backward support surface translations (delivered in pseudo-random order). Postural responses were re-assessed 24 h later to determine whether improvements were retained. People who freeze did not improve or retain improvement in protective postural responses as well as nonfreezers in our primary outcome variable, center of mass (COM) displacement after perturbations (post hoc across group assessments: freezers- p = 0.14 and nonfreezers- p = 0.001, respectively). However, other protective stepping outcomes, including margin of stability, step length, and step time, improved similarly across groups. Significant improvements were retained in both groups. In conclusion, people with PD who freeze exhibited reduced ability to improve protective postural responses in some, but not all, outcome variables. Additional training may be necessary to improve protective postural responses in people with PD who freeze.

KW - freezing of gait

KW - motor learning

KW - Parkinson's disease

KW - posture

KW - stepping

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983568207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983568207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.08.017

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.08.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 27530701

AN - SCOPUS:84983568207

VL - 334

SP - 283

EP - 289

JO - Neuroscience

JF - Neuroscience

SN - 0306-4522

ER -