TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of expectancies of different reward magnitudes in transfer from noncontingent pairings to instrumental performance
AU - Capaldi, Elizabeth D.
AU - Hovancik, John R.
AU - Friedman, Frank
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported in part by Grant MH 23446-01 from the National Institute of Mental Health to the first author. Reprints can be obtained from Eliza-bethD. Capaldi, Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907. * Now at State University of New York College at Oswego. * The term mediator is employed here as a general term for any representation of the reward which may be formed as a result of stimulus-reward pairings. As will be seen later, the present results suggest that this mediator is profitably conceptualized as an expectancy of reward.
PY - 1976/5
Y1 - 1976/5
N2 - In two experiments, rats received noncontingent pairings of two stimuli with food reward, one paired with small reward and the other with large reward, and received bar press training with large reward or with small reward. When the noncontingent stimuli (NS) were presented for test during subsequent rewarded bar pressing and during early extinction of bar pressing, responding for each group was faster in the presence of the NS which was paired with the same reward magnitude that group received in bar press training than to the NS which had been paired with a different reward magnitude. As extinction progressed, all groups responded more slowly in the presence of the NS which had been paired with the large reward than in the presence of the NS which had been paired with small reward. These results were interpreted as indicating that responding in the presence of an NS depends on: (i) whether the reward expectancy elicited by the NS has been conditioned to the instrumental response, and (ii) the relationship between the reward expected in the presence of the NS and that received in test.
AB - In two experiments, rats received noncontingent pairings of two stimuli with food reward, one paired with small reward and the other with large reward, and received bar press training with large reward or with small reward. When the noncontingent stimuli (NS) were presented for test during subsequent rewarded bar pressing and during early extinction of bar pressing, responding for each group was faster in the presence of the NS which was paired with the same reward magnitude that group received in bar press training than to the NS which had been paired with a different reward magnitude. As extinction progressed, all groups responded more slowly in the presence of the NS which had been paired with the large reward than in the presence of the NS which had been paired with small reward. These results were interpreted as indicating that responding in the presence of an NS depends on: (i) whether the reward expectancy elicited by the NS has been conditioned to the instrumental response, and (ii) the relationship between the reward expected in the presence of the NS and that received in test.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49549135664&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49549135664&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0023-9690(76)90028-X
DO - 10.1016/0023-9690(76)90028-X
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:49549135664
SN - 0023-9690
VL - 7
SP - 197
EP - 210
JO - Learning and Motivation
JF - Learning and Motivation
IS - 2
ER -