Effects of biotic interactions on modeled species' distribution can be masked by environmental gradients

William Godsoe, Janet Franklin, F. Guillaume Blanchet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A fundamental goal of ecology is to understand the determinants of species' distributions (i.e., the set of locations where a species is present). Competition among species (i.e., interactions among species that harms each of the species involved) is common in nature and it would be tremendously useful to quantify its effects on species' distributions. An approach to studying the large-scale effects of competition or other biotic interactions is to fit species' distributions models (SDMs) and assess the effect of competitors on the distribution and abundance of the species of interest. It is often difficult to validate the accuracy of this approach with available data. Here, we simulate virtual species that experience competition. In these simulated datasets, we can unambiguously identify the effects that competition has on a species' distribution. We then fit SDMs to the simulated datasets and test whether we can use the outputs of the SDMs to infer the true effect of competition in each simulated dataset. In our simulations, the abiotic environment influenced the effects of competition. Thus, our SDMs often inferred that the abiotic environment was a strong predictor of species abundance, even when the species' distribution was strongly affected by competition. The severity of this problem depended on whether the competitor excluded the focal species from highly suitable sites or marginally suitable sites. Our results highlight how correlations between biotic interactions and the abiotic environment make it difficult to infer the effects of competition using SDMs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)654-664
Number of pages11
JournalEcology and Evolution
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

environmental gradient
biogeography
distribution
effect
ecology
scale effect

Keywords

  • competition
  • dispersal
  • ecological niche
  • priority effect
  • range limits
  • species' distribution model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Effects of biotic interactions on modeled species' distribution can be masked by environmental gradients. / Godsoe, William; Franklin, Janet; Blanchet, F. Guillaume.

In: Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 7, No. 2, 01.01.2017, p. 654-664.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Godsoe, William ; Franklin, Janet ; Blanchet, F. Guillaume. / Effects of biotic interactions on modeled species' distribution can be masked by environmental gradients. In: Ecology and Evolution. 2017 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 654-664.
@article{921ae4d541a44656b37a263ecde12694,
title = "Effects of biotic interactions on modeled species' distribution can be masked by environmental gradients",
abstract = "A fundamental goal of ecology is to understand the determinants of species' distributions (i.e., the set of locations where a species is present). Competition among species (i.e., interactions among species that harms each of the species involved) is common in nature and it would be tremendously useful to quantify its effects on species' distributions. An approach to studying the large-scale effects of competition or other biotic interactions is to fit species' distributions models (SDMs) and assess the effect of competitors on the distribution and abundance of the species of interest. It is often difficult to validate the accuracy of this approach with available data. Here, we simulate virtual species that experience competition. In these simulated datasets, we can unambiguously identify the effects that competition has on a species' distribution. We then fit SDMs to the simulated datasets and test whether we can use the outputs of the SDMs to infer the true effect of competition in each simulated dataset. In our simulations, the abiotic environment influenced the effects of competition. Thus, our SDMs often inferred that the abiotic environment was a strong predictor of species abundance, even when the species' distribution was strongly affected by competition. The severity of this problem depended on whether the competitor excluded the focal species from highly suitable sites or marginally suitable sites. Our results highlight how correlations between biotic interactions and the abiotic environment make it difficult to infer the effects of competition using SDMs.",
keywords = "competition, dispersal, ecological niche, priority effect, range limits, species' distribution model",
author = "William Godsoe and Janet Franklin and Blanchet, {F. Guillaume}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ece3.2657",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "654--664",
journal = "Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "2045-7758",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of biotic interactions on modeled species' distribution can be masked by environmental gradients

AU - Godsoe, William

AU - Franklin, Janet

AU - Blanchet, F. Guillaume

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - A fundamental goal of ecology is to understand the determinants of species' distributions (i.e., the set of locations where a species is present). Competition among species (i.e., interactions among species that harms each of the species involved) is common in nature and it would be tremendously useful to quantify its effects on species' distributions. An approach to studying the large-scale effects of competition or other biotic interactions is to fit species' distributions models (SDMs) and assess the effect of competitors on the distribution and abundance of the species of interest. It is often difficult to validate the accuracy of this approach with available data. Here, we simulate virtual species that experience competition. In these simulated datasets, we can unambiguously identify the effects that competition has on a species' distribution. We then fit SDMs to the simulated datasets and test whether we can use the outputs of the SDMs to infer the true effect of competition in each simulated dataset. In our simulations, the abiotic environment influenced the effects of competition. Thus, our SDMs often inferred that the abiotic environment was a strong predictor of species abundance, even when the species' distribution was strongly affected by competition. The severity of this problem depended on whether the competitor excluded the focal species from highly suitable sites or marginally suitable sites. Our results highlight how correlations between biotic interactions and the abiotic environment make it difficult to infer the effects of competition using SDMs.

AB - A fundamental goal of ecology is to understand the determinants of species' distributions (i.e., the set of locations where a species is present). Competition among species (i.e., interactions among species that harms each of the species involved) is common in nature and it would be tremendously useful to quantify its effects on species' distributions. An approach to studying the large-scale effects of competition or other biotic interactions is to fit species' distributions models (SDMs) and assess the effect of competitors on the distribution and abundance of the species of interest. It is often difficult to validate the accuracy of this approach with available data. Here, we simulate virtual species that experience competition. In these simulated datasets, we can unambiguously identify the effects that competition has on a species' distribution. We then fit SDMs to the simulated datasets and test whether we can use the outputs of the SDMs to infer the true effect of competition in each simulated dataset. In our simulations, the abiotic environment influenced the effects of competition. Thus, our SDMs often inferred that the abiotic environment was a strong predictor of species abundance, even when the species' distribution was strongly affected by competition. The severity of this problem depended on whether the competitor excluded the focal species from highly suitable sites or marginally suitable sites. Our results highlight how correlations between biotic interactions and the abiotic environment make it difficult to infer the effects of competition using SDMs.

KW - competition

KW - dispersal

KW - ecological niche

KW - priority effect

KW - range limits

KW - species' distribution model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007343927&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007343927&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ece3.2657

DO - 10.1002/ece3.2657

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 654

EP - 664

JO - Ecology and Evolution

JF - Ecology and Evolution

SN - 2045-7758

IS - 2

ER -