Effectiveness of public health quality improvement training approaches

Application, application, application

Mary V. Davis, Amy Vincus, Matthew Eggers, Elizabeth Mahanna, William Riley, Brenda Joly, Jessica Solomon Fisher, Michael J. Bowling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Quality improvement (QI) has been identified as a key strategy to improve the performance of state and local public health agencies. Quality improvement training effectiveness has received little attention in the literature. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of 3 QI training types: webinars, workshops, and demonstration site activities on improving participant knowledge, skill, and ability to conduct QI through a questionnaire conducted after training participation. Design: We used a natural experimental design hypothesizing that demonstration site participants would have the greatest gains on outcomes of interest compared with webinar and workshop participants. Bivariate and multivariate models were used to examine outcome differences between questionnaire respondents who participated in various training types. Participants: Local health department employees who participated in the 3 training strategies. Main Outcome Measures: Measures included knowledge and skill gain, skill application, QI receptivity, and ability to successfully participate in a QI project. Results: Two hundred eighty-four unique individuals who work in 143 health departments completed the questionnaire for a 59% response rate. The majority of these health departments serve midsize populations. Demonstration site respondents had significantly greater gains in knowledge and skills, skill application, and ability to successfully participate in a QI project. Webcast training participants had significantly higher QI receptivity in adjusted models. Respondents who participated in both webcast and demonstration site trainings had higher mean scores on all outcomes when compared with demonstration site single training participants, these differences were significant in unadjusted models. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that QI training for public health agency employees should include both didactic training on QI content and opportunities for QI application. Future research should examine if this approach can effectively increase successful participation in QI projects for staff in LHDs of all sizes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Public Health Management and Practice
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Public Health
Webcasts
Education
Health
Occupational Health
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research Design
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • local health department
  • public health workforce
  • quality improvement
  • training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Policy
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Effectiveness of public health quality improvement training approaches : Application, application, application. / Davis, Mary V.; Vincus, Amy; Eggers, Matthew; Mahanna, Elizabeth; Riley, William; Joly, Brenda; Fisher, Jessica Solomon; Bowling, Michael J.

In: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, Vol. 18, No. 1, 01.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Davis, Mary V. ; Vincus, Amy ; Eggers, Matthew ; Mahanna, Elizabeth ; Riley, William ; Joly, Brenda ; Fisher, Jessica Solomon ; Bowling, Michael J. / Effectiveness of public health quality improvement training approaches : Application, application, application. In: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2012 ; Vol. 18, No. 1.
@article{4c7008658a2e400da91105cd6d0f32aa,
title = "Effectiveness of public health quality improvement training approaches: Application, application, application",
abstract = "Context: Quality improvement (QI) has been identified as a key strategy to improve the performance of state and local public health agencies. Quality improvement training effectiveness has received little attention in the literature. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of 3 QI training types: webinars, workshops, and demonstration site activities on improving participant knowledge, skill, and ability to conduct QI through a questionnaire conducted after training participation. Design: We used a natural experimental design hypothesizing that demonstration site participants would have the greatest gains on outcomes of interest compared with webinar and workshop participants. Bivariate and multivariate models were used to examine outcome differences between questionnaire respondents who participated in various training types. Participants: Local health department employees who participated in the 3 training strategies. Main Outcome Measures: Measures included knowledge and skill gain, skill application, QI receptivity, and ability to successfully participate in a QI project. Results: Two hundred eighty-four unique individuals who work in 143 health departments completed the questionnaire for a 59{\%} response rate. The majority of these health departments serve midsize populations. Demonstration site respondents had significantly greater gains in knowledge and skills, skill application, and ability to successfully participate in a QI project. Webcast training participants had significantly higher QI receptivity in adjusted models. Respondents who participated in both webcast and demonstration site trainings had higher mean scores on all outcomes when compared with demonstration site single training participants, these differences were significant in unadjusted models. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that QI training for public health agency employees should include both didactic training on QI content and opportunities for QI application. Future research should examine if this approach can effectively increase successful participation in QI projects for staff in LHDs of all sizes.",
keywords = "local health department, public health workforce, quality improvement, training",
author = "Davis, {Mary V.} and Amy Vincus and Matthew Eggers and Elizabeth Mahanna and William Riley and Brenda Joly and Fisher, {Jessica Solomon} and Bowling, {Michael J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182249505",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Management and Practice",
issn = "1078-4659",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of public health quality improvement training approaches

T2 - Application, application, application

AU - Davis, Mary V.

AU - Vincus, Amy

AU - Eggers, Matthew

AU - Mahanna, Elizabeth

AU - Riley, William

AU - Joly, Brenda

AU - Fisher, Jessica Solomon

AU - Bowling, Michael J.

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Context: Quality improvement (QI) has been identified as a key strategy to improve the performance of state and local public health agencies. Quality improvement training effectiveness has received little attention in the literature. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of 3 QI training types: webinars, workshops, and demonstration site activities on improving participant knowledge, skill, and ability to conduct QI through a questionnaire conducted after training participation. Design: We used a natural experimental design hypothesizing that demonstration site participants would have the greatest gains on outcomes of interest compared with webinar and workshop participants. Bivariate and multivariate models were used to examine outcome differences between questionnaire respondents who participated in various training types. Participants: Local health department employees who participated in the 3 training strategies. Main Outcome Measures: Measures included knowledge and skill gain, skill application, QI receptivity, and ability to successfully participate in a QI project. Results: Two hundred eighty-four unique individuals who work in 143 health departments completed the questionnaire for a 59% response rate. The majority of these health departments serve midsize populations. Demonstration site respondents had significantly greater gains in knowledge and skills, skill application, and ability to successfully participate in a QI project. Webcast training participants had significantly higher QI receptivity in adjusted models. Respondents who participated in both webcast and demonstration site trainings had higher mean scores on all outcomes when compared with demonstration site single training participants, these differences were significant in unadjusted models. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that QI training for public health agency employees should include both didactic training on QI content and opportunities for QI application. Future research should examine if this approach can effectively increase successful participation in QI projects for staff in LHDs of all sizes.

AB - Context: Quality improvement (QI) has been identified as a key strategy to improve the performance of state and local public health agencies. Quality improvement training effectiveness has received little attention in the literature. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of 3 QI training types: webinars, workshops, and demonstration site activities on improving participant knowledge, skill, and ability to conduct QI through a questionnaire conducted after training participation. Design: We used a natural experimental design hypothesizing that demonstration site participants would have the greatest gains on outcomes of interest compared with webinar and workshop participants. Bivariate and multivariate models were used to examine outcome differences between questionnaire respondents who participated in various training types. Participants: Local health department employees who participated in the 3 training strategies. Main Outcome Measures: Measures included knowledge and skill gain, skill application, QI receptivity, and ability to successfully participate in a QI project. Results: Two hundred eighty-four unique individuals who work in 143 health departments completed the questionnaire for a 59% response rate. The majority of these health departments serve midsize populations. Demonstration site respondents had significantly greater gains in knowledge and skills, skill application, and ability to successfully participate in a QI project. Webcast training participants had significantly higher QI receptivity in adjusted models. Respondents who participated in both webcast and demonstration site trainings had higher mean scores on all outcomes when compared with demonstration site single training participants, these differences were significant in unadjusted models. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that QI training for public health agency employees should include both didactic training on QI content and opportunities for QI application. Future research should examine if this approach can effectively increase successful participation in QI projects for staff in LHDs of all sizes.

KW - local health department

KW - public health workforce

KW - quality improvement

KW - training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83155188967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=83155188967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182249505

DO - 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182249505

M3 - Article

VL - 18

JO - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

JF - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

SN - 1078-4659

IS - 1

ER -