Effectiveness of holistic mental model confrontation in driving conceptual change

Soniya Gadgil, Timothy J. Nokes-Malach, Michelene Chi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior research on conceptual change has identified multiple kinds of misconceptions at different levels of representational complexity including false beliefs, flawed mental models, and incorrect ontological categories. We hypothesized that conceptual change of a mental model requires change in the system of relations between the features of the prior model. To test this hypothesis, we compared instruction aimed at revising knowledge at the mental model level called holistic confrontation - in which the learner compares and contrasts a diagram of his or her flawed mental model to an expert model - to instruction aimed at revising knowledge at the false belief level - in which the learner is prompted to self-explain the expert model alone. We found evidence that participants who engaged in holistic confrontation were more likely to acquire a correct mental model, and a deeper understanding of the systems of relations in the model than those who were prompted to self-explain the expert model. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for science instruction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)47-61
Number of pages15
JournalLearning and Instruction
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2012

Fingerprint

Research
expert
instruction
science
evidence

Keywords

  • Comparison
  • Conceptual change
  • Learning
  • Mental models
  • Self-explanation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education

Cite this

Effectiveness of holistic mental model confrontation in driving conceptual change. / Gadgil, Soniya; Nokes-Malach, Timothy J.; Chi, Michelene.

In: Learning and Instruction, Vol. 22, No. 1, 02.2012, p. 47-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gadgil, Soniya ; Nokes-Malach, Timothy J. ; Chi, Michelene. / Effectiveness of holistic mental model confrontation in driving conceptual change. In: Learning and Instruction. 2012 ; Vol. 22, No. 1. pp. 47-61.
@article{94536faaa70742968cc5289fdbd75917,
title = "Effectiveness of holistic mental model confrontation in driving conceptual change",
abstract = "Prior research on conceptual change has identified multiple kinds of misconceptions at different levels of representational complexity including false beliefs, flawed mental models, and incorrect ontological categories. We hypothesized that conceptual change of a mental model requires change in the system of relations between the features of the prior model. To test this hypothesis, we compared instruction aimed at revising knowledge at the mental model level called holistic confrontation - in which the learner compares and contrasts a diagram of his or her flawed mental model to an expert model - to instruction aimed at revising knowledge at the false belief level - in which the learner is prompted to self-explain the expert model alone. We found evidence that participants who engaged in holistic confrontation were more likely to acquire a correct mental model, and a deeper understanding of the systems of relations in the model than those who were prompted to self-explain the expert model. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for science instruction.",
keywords = "Comparison, Conceptual change, Learning, Mental models, Self-explanation",
author = "Soniya Gadgil and Nokes-Malach, {Timothy J.} and Michelene Chi",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.06.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "47--61",
journal = "Learning and Instruction",
issn = "0959-4752",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of holistic mental model confrontation in driving conceptual change

AU - Gadgil, Soniya

AU - Nokes-Malach, Timothy J.

AU - Chi, Michelene

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - Prior research on conceptual change has identified multiple kinds of misconceptions at different levels of representational complexity including false beliefs, flawed mental models, and incorrect ontological categories. We hypothesized that conceptual change of a mental model requires change in the system of relations between the features of the prior model. To test this hypothesis, we compared instruction aimed at revising knowledge at the mental model level called holistic confrontation - in which the learner compares and contrasts a diagram of his or her flawed mental model to an expert model - to instruction aimed at revising knowledge at the false belief level - in which the learner is prompted to self-explain the expert model alone. We found evidence that participants who engaged in holistic confrontation were more likely to acquire a correct mental model, and a deeper understanding of the systems of relations in the model than those who were prompted to self-explain the expert model. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for science instruction.

AB - Prior research on conceptual change has identified multiple kinds of misconceptions at different levels of representational complexity including false beliefs, flawed mental models, and incorrect ontological categories. We hypothesized that conceptual change of a mental model requires change in the system of relations between the features of the prior model. To test this hypothesis, we compared instruction aimed at revising knowledge at the mental model level called holistic confrontation - in which the learner compares and contrasts a diagram of his or her flawed mental model to an expert model - to instruction aimed at revising knowledge at the false belief level - in which the learner is prompted to self-explain the expert model alone. We found evidence that participants who engaged in holistic confrontation were more likely to acquire a correct mental model, and a deeper understanding of the systems of relations in the model than those who were prompted to self-explain the expert model. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for science instruction.

KW - Comparison

KW - Conceptual change

KW - Learning

KW - Mental models

KW - Self-explanation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82455187970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82455187970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.06.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:82455187970

VL - 22

SP - 47

EP - 61

JO - Learning and Instruction

JF - Learning and Instruction

SN - 0959-4752

IS - 1

ER -