Effect of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word-learning configuration by preschoolers with typical development and specific language impairment

Shelley Gray, Andrea Pittman, Juliet Weinhold

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    17 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose: In this study, the authors assessed the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word-learning configuration by preschoolers with specific language impairment (SLI) and typical language development (TD). Method: One hundred thirty-one children participated: 48 with SLI, 44 with TD matched on age and gender, and 39 with TD matched on vocabulary and gender. Referent identification and naming were assessed in a computer-based learning context. Results: For referent identification, preschoolers with TD benefited from high phonotactic probability, and the younger group also benefited from low neighborhood density. In contrast, the SLI group benefited only from high neighborhood density. For naming, older preschoolers with TD benefited most from low-density words, younger preschoolers with TD benefited most from words with high phonotactic probability, and the SLI group showed no advantage. Conclusion: Phonotactic probability and neighborhood density had different effects on each group that may be related to children's ability to store well-specified word forms and to the size of their extant lexicon. The authors argue that cross-study comparisons of word learning are needed; therefore, researchers should describe word, referent, and learner characteristics and the learning context and should situate their studies in a triggering → configuration + engagement model of word learning.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1011-1025
    Number of pages15
    JournalJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
    Volume57
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Language Development
    Learning
    Language
    language
    learning
    Aptitude
    Vocabulary
    Group
    Specific Language Impairment
    Neighborhood Density
    Phonotactic Probability
    Word Learning
    Preschoolers
    Research Personnel
    gender
    vocabulary
    Referent

    Keywords

    • Children
    • Development
    • Language
    • Language disorders
    • Specific language impairment

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Speech and Hearing
    • Language and Linguistics
    • Linguistics and Language
    • Medicine(all)

    Cite this

    @article{9a3328f8596840b88f2dc6e73e72ee99,
    title = "Effect of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word-learning configuration by preschoolers with typical development and specific language impairment",
    abstract = "Purpose: In this study, the authors assessed the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word-learning configuration by preschoolers with specific language impairment (SLI) and typical language development (TD). Method: One hundred thirty-one children participated: 48 with SLI, 44 with TD matched on age and gender, and 39 with TD matched on vocabulary and gender. Referent identification and naming were assessed in a computer-based learning context. Results: For referent identification, preschoolers with TD benefited from high phonotactic probability, and the younger group also benefited from low neighborhood density. In contrast, the SLI group benefited only from high neighborhood density. For naming, older preschoolers with TD benefited most from low-density words, younger preschoolers with TD benefited most from words with high phonotactic probability, and the SLI group showed no advantage. Conclusion: Phonotactic probability and neighborhood density had different effects on each group that may be related to children's ability to store well-specified word forms and to the size of their extant lexicon. The authors argue that cross-study comparisons of word learning are needed; therefore, researchers should describe word, referent, and learner characteristics and the learning context and should situate their studies in a triggering → configuration + engagement model of word learning.",
    keywords = "Children, Development, Language, Language disorders, Specific language impairment",
    author = "Shelley Gray and Andrea Pittman and Juliet Weinhold",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-12-0282",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "57",
    pages = "1011--1025",
    journal = "Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research",
    issn = "1092-4388",
    publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Effect of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word-learning configuration by preschoolers with typical development and specific language impairment

    AU - Gray, Shelley

    AU - Pittman, Andrea

    AU - Weinhold, Juliet

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Purpose: In this study, the authors assessed the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word-learning configuration by preschoolers with specific language impairment (SLI) and typical language development (TD). Method: One hundred thirty-one children participated: 48 with SLI, 44 with TD matched on age and gender, and 39 with TD matched on vocabulary and gender. Referent identification and naming were assessed in a computer-based learning context. Results: For referent identification, preschoolers with TD benefited from high phonotactic probability, and the younger group also benefited from low neighborhood density. In contrast, the SLI group benefited only from high neighborhood density. For naming, older preschoolers with TD benefited most from low-density words, younger preschoolers with TD benefited most from words with high phonotactic probability, and the SLI group showed no advantage. Conclusion: Phonotactic probability and neighborhood density had different effects on each group that may be related to children's ability to store well-specified word forms and to the size of their extant lexicon. The authors argue that cross-study comparisons of word learning are needed; therefore, researchers should describe word, referent, and learner characteristics and the learning context and should situate their studies in a triggering → configuration + engagement model of word learning.

    AB - Purpose: In this study, the authors assessed the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word-learning configuration by preschoolers with specific language impairment (SLI) and typical language development (TD). Method: One hundred thirty-one children participated: 48 with SLI, 44 with TD matched on age and gender, and 39 with TD matched on vocabulary and gender. Referent identification and naming were assessed in a computer-based learning context. Results: For referent identification, preschoolers with TD benefited from high phonotactic probability, and the younger group also benefited from low neighborhood density. In contrast, the SLI group benefited only from high neighborhood density. For naming, older preschoolers with TD benefited most from low-density words, younger preschoolers with TD benefited most from words with high phonotactic probability, and the SLI group showed no advantage. Conclusion: Phonotactic probability and neighborhood density had different effects on each group that may be related to children's ability to store well-specified word forms and to the size of their extant lexicon. The authors argue that cross-study comparisons of word learning are needed; therefore, researchers should describe word, referent, and learner characteristics and the learning context and should situate their studies in a triggering → configuration + engagement model of word learning.

    KW - Children

    KW - Development

    KW - Language

    KW - Language disorders

    KW - Specific language impairment

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902845518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902845518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-12-0282

    DO - 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-12-0282

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 24686926

    AN - SCOPUS:84902845518

    VL - 57

    SP - 1011

    EP - 1025

    JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

    JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

    SN - 1092-4388

    IS - 3

    ER -