Effect of pavement type on overlay roughness progression

Ellie H. Fini, Mahour Mellat-Parast

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of overlay type (asphalt and concrete) on the progression of pavement roughness as described by the international roughness index (IRI). Pavement roughness is defined as deformities or irregularities found at the pavement surface affecting the smoothness of a ride. Both overlays in this study are asphalt: one placed on asphalt paved roads and one placed on top of prior concrete pavement. Data were collected from nine states using data in the Long-Term Pavement Performance database (GPS6 and GPS7). Only U.S. states and Canadian provinces that have both GPS6 and GPS7 sections are considered for analysis. Pavement factors (overlay age, temperature, freezing index, and overlay thickness) that significantly impact overlay performance in U.S. and Canadian environments have been used for analysis. Multivariate regression analysis was used to compare the effect of key variables (age, temperature, freezing index, and surface thickness) on IRI. Results show that there is a significant difference between overlay types in terms of the effect of key variables on IRI. Asphalt on concrete overlay has a significantly better IRI performance in terms of age, temperature, and surface thickness. Asphalt on asphalt overlay has a significantly better performance in terms of freezing index. This suggests that when age, temperature, and surface thickness are considered, asphalt on concrete provides a better IRI. Asphalt on asphalt provides a better IRI for freezing index.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1558-1562
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Transportation Engineering
Volume138
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pavement overlays
Asphalt
Pavements
Surface roughness
Freezing
Concretes
performance
Temperature
deformity
Concrete pavements
Regression analysis
multivariate analysis
regression analysis
road

Keywords

  • Freezing index
  • Overlay roughness progression
  • Pavement engineering
  • Temperature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Transportation

Cite this

Effect of pavement type on overlay roughness progression. / Fini, Ellie H.; Mellat-Parast, Mahour.

In: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 138, No. 12, 01.12.2012, p. 1558-1562.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fini, Ellie H. ; Mellat-Parast, Mahour. / Effect of pavement type on overlay roughness progression. In: Journal of Transportation Engineering. 2012 ; Vol. 138, No. 12. pp. 1558-1562.
@article{204a080c3e0d4663b1cbe53c666e916a,
title = "Effect of pavement type on overlay roughness progression",
abstract = "This paper investigates the impact of overlay type (asphalt and concrete) on the progression of pavement roughness as described by the international roughness index (IRI). Pavement roughness is defined as deformities or irregularities found at the pavement surface affecting the smoothness of a ride. Both overlays in this study are asphalt: one placed on asphalt paved roads and one placed on top of prior concrete pavement. Data were collected from nine states using data in the Long-Term Pavement Performance database (GPS6 and GPS7). Only U.S. states and Canadian provinces that have both GPS6 and GPS7 sections are considered for analysis. Pavement factors (overlay age, temperature, freezing index, and overlay thickness) that significantly impact overlay performance in U.S. and Canadian environments have been used for analysis. Multivariate regression analysis was used to compare the effect of key variables (age, temperature, freezing index, and surface thickness) on IRI. Results show that there is a significant difference between overlay types in terms of the effect of key variables on IRI. Asphalt on concrete overlay has a significantly better IRI performance in terms of age, temperature, and surface thickness. Asphalt on asphalt overlay has a significantly better performance in terms of freezing index. This suggests that when age, temperature, and surface thickness are considered, asphalt on concrete provides a better IRI. Asphalt on asphalt provides a better IRI for freezing index.",
keywords = "Freezing index, Overlay roughness progression, Pavement engineering, Temperature",
author = "Fini, {Ellie H.} and Mahour Mellat-Parast",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000459",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "138",
pages = "1558--1562",
journal = "Transportation engineering journal of ASCE",
issn = "0733-947X",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of pavement type on overlay roughness progression

AU - Fini, Ellie H.

AU - Mellat-Parast, Mahour

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - This paper investigates the impact of overlay type (asphalt and concrete) on the progression of pavement roughness as described by the international roughness index (IRI). Pavement roughness is defined as deformities or irregularities found at the pavement surface affecting the smoothness of a ride. Both overlays in this study are asphalt: one placed on asphalt paved roads and one placed on top of prior concrete pavement. Data were collected from nine states using data in the Long-Term Pavement Performance database (GPS6 and GPS7). Only U.S. states and Canadian provinces that have both GPS6 and GPS7 sections are considered for analysis. Pavement factors (overlay age, temperature, freezing index, and overlay thickness) that significantly impact overlay performance in U.S. and Canadian environments have been used for analysis. Multivariate regression analysis was used to compare the effect of key variables (age, temperature, freezing index, and surface thickness) on IRI. Results show that there is a significant difference between overlay types in terms of the effect of key variables on IRI. Asphalt on concrete overlay has a significantly better IRI performance in terms of age, temperature, and surface thickness. Asphalt on asphalt overlay has a significantly better performance in terms of freezing index. This suggests that when age, temperature, and surface thickness are considered, asphalt on concrete provides a better IRI. Asphalt on asphalt provides a better IRI for freezing index.

AB - This paper investigates the impact of overlay type (asphalt and concrete) on the progression of pavement roughness as described by the international roughness index (IRI). Pavement roughness is defined as deformities or irregularities found at the pavement surface affecting the smoothness of a ride. Both overlays in this study are asphalt: one placed on asphalt paved roads and one placed on top of prior concrete pavement. Data were collected from nine states using data in the Long-Term Pavement Performance database (GPS6 and GPS7). Only U.S. states and Canadian provinces that have both GPS6 and GPS7 sections are considered for analysis. Pavement factors (overlay age, temperature, freezing index, and overlay thickness) that significantly impact overlay performance in U.S. and Canadian environments have been used for analysis. Multivariate regression analysis was used to compare the effect of key variables (age, temperature, freezing index, and surface thickness) on IRI. Results show that there is a significant difference between overlay types in terms of the effect of key variables on IRI. Asphalt on concrete overlay has a significantly better IRI performance in terms of age, temperature, and surface thickness. Asphalt on asphalt overlay has a significantly better performance in terms of freezing index. This suggests that when age, temperature, and surface thickness are considered, asphalt on concrete provides a better IRI. Asphalt on asphalt provides a better IRI for freezing index.

KW - Freezing index

KW - Overlay roughness progression

KW - Pavement engineering

KW - Temperature

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884641751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884641751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000459

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000459

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84884641751

VL - 138

SP - 1558

EP - 1562

JO - Transportation engineering journal of ASCE

JF - Transportation engineering journal of ASCE

SN - 0733-947X

IS - 12

ER -