Effect of artificial surveillance cues on reported moral judgment

Experimental failures to replicate and two meta-analyses

Stefanie B. Northover, William C. Pedersen, Adam Cohen, Paul W. Andrews

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several papers have reported that artificial surveillance cues, such as images of watching eyes, cause anonymous participants to behave as if they are actually under surveillance, thus increasing moral behavior. In a series of four experiments, we found no evidence that artificial surveillance cues impact reported moral judgment, self-rated possession of positive traits, or religiosity. Two small meta-analyses, both comprising six experiments investigating the effect of artificial surveillance cues on moral judgment, provided mixed conclusions. One meta-analysis produced a mean effect size not significantly different from zero and the other produced a mean effect size on the edge of significance. On the whole, artificial surveillance cues have inconsistent effects, or possibly no effect, on moral outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEvolution and Human Behavior
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Aug 3 2016

Fingerprint

Cues
Meta-Analysis
monitoring
meta-analysis
experiment
eyes
effect
surveillance
Moral Judgment
Surveillance
Artificial
Effect Size
Experiment

Keywords

  • Cues of being watched
  • Eyespots
  • Meta-analysis
  • Moral judgment
  • Observation cues
  • Surveillance cues

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Effect of artificial surveillance cues on reported moral judgment : Experimental failures to replicate and two meta-analyses. / Northover, Stefanie B.; Pedersen, William C.; Cohen, Adam; Andrews, Paul W.

In: Evolution and Human Behavior, 03.08.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{89b7a49b158f4dc293a30d2679a630c9,
title = "Effect of artificial surveillance cues on reported moral judgment: Experimental failures to replicate and two meta-analyses",
abstract = "Several papers have reported that artificial surveillance cues, such as images of watching eyes, cause anonymous participants to behave as if they are actually under surveillance, thus increasing moral behavior. In a series of four experiments, we found no evidence that artificial surveillance cues impact reported moral judgment, self-rated possession of positive traits, or religiosity. Two small meta-analyses, both comprising six experiments investigating the effect of artificial surveillance cues on moral judgment, provided mixed conclusions. One meta-analysis produced a mean effect size not significantly different from zero and the other produced a mean effect size on the edge of significance. On the whole, artificial surveillance cues have inconsistent effects, or possibly no effect, on moral outcomes.",
keywords = "Cues of being watched, Eyespots, Meta-analysis, Moral judgment, Observation cues, Surveillance cues",
author = "Northover, {Stefanie B.} and Pedersen, {William C.} and Adam Cohen and Andrews, {Paul W.}",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.12.003",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Evolution and Human Behavior",
issn = "1090-5138",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of artificial surveillance cues on reported moral judgment

T2 - Experimental failures to replicate and two meta-analyses

AU - Northover, Stefanie B.

AU - Pedersen, William C.

AU - Cohen, Adam

AU - Andrews, Paul W.

PY - 2016/8/3

Y1 - 2016/8/3

N2 - Several papers have reported that artificial surveillance cues, such as images of watching eyes, cause anonymous participants to behave as if they are actually under surveillance, thus increasing moral behavior. In a series of four experiments, we found no evidence that artificial surveillance cues impact reported moral judgment, self-rated possession of positive traits, or religiosity. Two small meta-analyses, both comprising six experiments investigating the effect of artificial surveillance cues on moral judgment, provided mixed conclusions. One meta-analysis produced a mean effect size not significantly different from zero and the other produced a mean effect size on the edge of significance. On the whole, artificial surveillance cues have inconsistent effects, or possibly no effect, on moral outcomes.

AB - Several papers have reported that artificial surveillance cues, such as images of watching eyes, cause anonymous participants to behave as if they are actually under surveillance, thus increasing moral behavior. In a series of four experiments, we found no evidence that artificial surveillance cues impact reported moral judgment, self-rated possession of positive traits, or religiosity. Two small meta-analyses, both comprising six experiments investigating the effect of artificial surveillance cues on moral judgment, provided mixed conclusions. One meta-analysis produced a mean effect size not significantly different from zero and the other produced a mean effect size on the edge of significance. On the whole, artificial surveillance cues have inconsistent effects, or possibly no effect, on moral outcomes.

KW - Cues of being watched

KW - Eyespots

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Moral judgment

KW - Observation cues

KW - Surveillance cues

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009157916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009157916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.12.003

M3 - Article

JO - Evolution and Human Behavior

JF - Evolution and Human Behavior

SN - 1090-5138

ER -