Ecosystem services in the Great Lakes

Alan D. Steinman, Bradley J. Cardinale, Wayne R. Munns, Mary E. Ogdahl, J. David Allan, Ted Angadi, Sarah Bartlett, Kate Brauman, Muruleedhara Byappanahalli, Matt Doss, Diane Dupont, Annie Johns, Donna Kashian, Frank Lupi, Peter McIntyre, Todd Miller, Michael Moore, Rebecca Muenich, Rajendra Poudel, James PriceBill Provencher, Anne Rea, Jennifer Read, Steven Renzetti, Brent Sohngen, Erika Washburn

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A comprehensive inventory of ecosystem services across the entire Great Lakes basin is currently lacking and is needed to make informed management decisions. A greater appreciation and understanding of ecosystem services, including both use and non-use services, may have avoided misguided resource management decisions in the past that resulted in negative legacies inherited by future generations. Given the interest in ecosystem services and lack of a coherent approach to addressing this topic in the Great Lakes, a summit was convened involving 28 experts working on various aspects of ecosystem services in the Great Lakes. The invited attendees spanned a variety of social and natural sciences. Given the unique status of the Great Lakes as the world's largest collective repository of surface freshwater, and the numerous stressors threatening this valuable resource, timing was propitious to examine ecosystem services. Several themes and recommendations emerged from the summit. There was general consensus that: 1) a comprehensive inventory of ecosystem services throughout the Great Lakes is a desirable goal but would require considerable resources; 2) more spatially and temporally intensive data are needed to overcome our data gaps, but the arrangement of data networks and observatories must be well-coordinated; 3) trade-offs must be considered as part of ecosystem services analyses; and 4) formation of a Great Lakes Institute for Ecosystem Services, to provide a hub for research, meetings, and training is desirable. Several challenges also emerged during the summit, which are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-168
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Great Lakes Research
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Great Lakes
ecosystem service
ecosystem services
lake
resource management
resource
repository
observatory
basins

Keywords

  • Ecosystem services
  • Laurentian Great Lakes
  • Use and non-use values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology

Cite this

Steinman, A. D., Cardinale, B. J., Munns, W. R., Ogdahl, M. E., Allan, J. D., Angadi, T., ... Washburn, E. (2017). Ecosystem services in the Great Lakes. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 43(3), 161-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2017.02.004

Ecosystem services in the Great Lakes. / Steinman, Alan D.; Cardinale, Bradley J.; Munns, Wayne R.; Ogdahl, Mary E.; Allan, J. David; Angadi, Ted; Bartlett, Sarah; Brauman, Kate; Byappanahalli, Muruleedhara; Doss, Matt; Dupont, Diane; Johns, Annie; Kashian, Donna; Lupi, Frank; McIntyre, Peter; Miller, Todd; Moore, Michael; Muenich, Rebecca; Poudel, Rajendra; Price, James; Provencher, Bill; Rea, Anne; Read, Jennifer; Renzetti, Steven; Sohngen, Brent; Washburn, Erika.

In: Journal of Great Lakes Research, Vol. 43, No. 3, 01.06.2017, p. 161-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Steinman, AD, Cardinale, BJ, Munns, WR, Ogdahl, ME, Allan, JD, Angadi, T, Bartlett, S, Brauman, K, Byappanahalli, M, Doss, M, Dupont, D, Johns, A, Kashian, D, Lupi, F, McIntyre, P, Miller, T, Moore, M, Muenich, R, Poudel, R, Price, J, Provencher, B, Rea, A, Read, J, Renzetti, S, Sohngen, B & Washburn, E 2017, 'Ecosystem services in the Great Lakes', Journal of Great Lakes Research, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 161-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2017.02.004
Steinman AD, Cardinale BJ, Munns WR, Ogdahl ME, Allan JD, Angadi T et al. Ecosystem services in the Great Lakes. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 2017 Jun 1;43(3):161-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2017.02.004
Steinman, Alan D. ; Cardinale, Bradley J. ; Munns, Wayne R. ; Ogdahl, Mary E. ; Allan, J. David ; Angadi, Ted ; Bartlett, Sarah ; Brauman, Kate ; Byappanahalli, Muruleedhara ; Doss, Matt ; Dupont, Diane ; Johns, Annie ; Kashian, Donna ; Lupi, Frank ; McIntyre, Peter ; Miller, Todd ; Moore, Michael ; Muenich, Rebecca ; Poudel, Rajendra ; Price, James ; Provencher, Bill ; Rea, Anne ; Read, Jennifer ; Renzetti, Steven ; Sohngen, Brent ; Washburn, Erika. / Ecosystem services in the Great Lakes. In: Journal of Great Lakes Research. 2017 ; Vol. 43, No. 3. pp. 161-168.
@article{b6e32f27a31049ea97e8be495e26a6d4,
title = "Ecosystem services in the Great Lakes",
abstract = "A comprehensive inventory of ecosystem services across the entire Great Lakes basin is currently lacking and is needed to make informed management decisions. A greater appreciation and understanding of ecosystem services, including both use and non-use services, may have avoided misguided resource management decisions in the past that resulted in negative legacies inherited by future generations. Given the interest in ecosystem services and lack of a coherent approach to addressing this topic in the Great Lakes, a summit was convened involving 28 experts working on various aspects of ecosystem services in the Great Lakes. The invited attendees spanned a variety of social and natural sciences. Given the unique status of the Great Lakes as the world's largest collective repository of surface freshwater, and the numerous stressors threatening this valuable resource, timing was propitious to examine ecosystem services. Several themes and recommendations emerged from the summit. There was general consensus that: 1) a comprehensive inventory of ecosystem services throughout the Great Lakes is a desirable goal but would require considerable resources; 2) more spatially and temporally intensive data are needed to overcome our data gaps, but the arrangement of data networks and observatories must be well-coordinated; 3) trade-offs must be considered as part of ecosystem services analyses; and 4) formation of a Great Lakes Institute for Ecosystem Services, to provide a hub for research, meetings, and training is desirable. Several challenges also emerged during the summit, which are discussed.",
keywords = "Ecosystem services, Laurentian Great Lakes, Use and non-use values",
author = "Steinman, {Alan D.} and Cardinale, {Bradley J.} and Munns, {Wayne R.} and Ogdahl, {Mary E.} and Allan, {J. David} and Ted Angadi and Sarah Bartlett and Kate Brauman and Muruleedhara Byappanahalli and Matt Doss and Diane Dupont and Annie Johns and Donna Kashian and Frank Lupi and Peter McIntyre and Todd Miller and Michael Moore and Rebecca Muenich and Rajendra Poudel and James Price and Bill Provencher and Anne Rea and Jennifer Read and Steven Renzetti and Brent Sohngen and Erika Washburn",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jglr.2017.02.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "161--168",
journal = "Journal of Great Lakes Research",
issn = "0380-1330",
publisher = "International Association of Great Lakes Research",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ecosystem services in the Great Lakes

AU - Steinman, Alan D.

AU - Cardinale, Bradley J.

AU - Munns, Wayne R.

AU - Ogdahl, Mary E.

AU - Allan, J. David

AU - Angadi, Ted

AU - Bartlett, Sarah

AU - Brauman, Kate

AU - Byappanahalli, Muruleedhara

AU - Doss, Matt

AU - Dupont, Diane

AU - Johns, Annie

AU - Kashian, Donna

AU - Lupi, Frank

AU - McIntyre, Peter

AU - Miller, Todd

AU - Moore, Michael

AU - Muenich, Rebecca

AU - Poudel, Rajendra

AU - Price, James

AU - Provencher, Bill

AU - Rea, Anne

AU - Read, Jennifer

AU - Renzetti, Steven

AU - Sohngen, Brent

AU - Washburn, Erika

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - A comprehensive inventory of ecosystem services across the entire Great Lakes basin is currently lacking and is needed to make informed management decisions. A greater appreciation and understanding of ecosystem services, including both use and non-use services, may have avoided misguided resource management decisions in the past that resulted in negative legacies inherited by future generations. Given the interest in ecosystem services and lack of a coherent approach to addressing this topic in the Great Lakes, a summit was convened involving 28 experts working on various aspects of ecosystem services in the Great Lakes. The invited attendees spanned a variety of social and natural sciences. Given the unique status of the Great Lakes as the world's largest collective repository of surface freshwater, and the numerous stressors threatening this valuable resource, timing was propitious to examine ecosystem services. Several themes and recommendations emerged from the summit. There was general consensus that: 1) a comprehensive inventory of ecosystem services throughout the Great Lakes is a desirable goal but would require considerable resources; 2) more spatially and temporally intensive data are needed to overcome our data gaps, but the arrangement of data networks and observatories must be well-coordinated; 3) trade-offs must be considered as part of ecosystem services analyses; and 4) formation of a Great Lakes Institute for Ecosystem Services, to provide a hub for research, meetings, and training is desirable. Several challenges also emerged during the summit, which are discussed.

AB - A comprehensive inventory of ecosystem services across the entire Great Lakes basin is currently lacking and is needed to make informed management decisions. A greater appreciation and understanding of ecosystem services, including both use and non-use services, may have avoided misguided resource management decisions in the past that resulted in negative legacies inherited by future generations. Given the interest in ecosystem services and lack of a coherent approach to addressing this topic in the Great Lakes, a summit was convened involving 28 experts working on various aspects of ecosystem services in the Great Lakes. The invited attendees spanned a variety of social and natural sciences. Given the unique status of the Great Lakes as the world's largest collective repository of surface freshwater, and the numerous stressors threatening this valuable resource, timing was propitious to examine ecosystem services. Several themes and recommendations emerged from the summit. There was general consensus that: 1) a comprehensive inventory of ecosystem services throughout the Great Lakes is a desirable goal but would require considerable resources; 2) more spatially and temporally intensive data are needed to overcome our data gaps, but the arrangement of data networks and observatories must be well-coordinated; 3) trade-offs must be considered as part of ecosystem services analyses; and 4) formation of a Great Lakes Institute for Ecosystem Services, to provide a hub for research, meetings, and training is desirable. Several challenges also emerged during the summit, which are discussed.

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - Laurentian Great Lakes

KW - Use and non-use values

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014391100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014391100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jglr.2017.02.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jglr.2017.02.004

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85014391100

VL - 43

SP - 161

EP - 168

JO - Journal of Great Lakes Research

JF - Journal of Great Lakes Research

SN - 0380-1330

IS - 3

ER -