Economic voting in U.S. presidential elections: Who blames whom for what

Daniel Eisenberg, Jonathan Ketcham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In United States presidential elections, the incumbent party's fortunes depend significantly on recent economic conditions, as numerous studies have shown. Many details of how economic voting takes place, however, are still not well understood. Here we present evidence on four issues. 1) Which is more important for determining people's votes, national or local economic conditions? 2) What time frame do people consider in economic voting? 3) Which demographic groups are most sensitive to the economy in their voting behavior? 4) How does economic voting depend on the political context - in particular, whether a candidate is running for re-election, and whether the incumbent party also controls Congress? Our study includes the first county-level analysis of economic voting in presidential elections. We find the answers to our four questions are: 1) national conditions, by far; 2) the most recent year; 3) blacks, females, and the non-elderly; and 4) no.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)497-521
Number of pages25
JournalTopics in Economic Analysis and Policy
Volume4
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Presidential elections
Economic voting
Economic conditions
Incumbents
Demographics
Vote
Voting behavior
Elections
Levels of analysis

Keywords

  • Economic voting
  • President
  • Presidential election

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

Economic voting in U.S. presidential elections : Who blames whom for what. / Eisenberg, Daniel; Ketcham, Jonathan.

In: Topics in Economic Analysis and Policy, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2004, p. 497-521.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{37c38afe315a47c78379b73525a84e9a,
title = "Economic voting in U.S. presidential elections: Who blames whom for what",
abstract = "In United States presidential elections, the incumbent party's fortunes depend significantly on recent economic conditions, as numerous studies have shown. Many details of how economic voting takes place, however, are still not well understood. Here we present evidence on four issues. 1) Which is more important for determining people's votes, national or local economic conditions? 2) What time frame do people consider in economic voting? 3) Which demographic groups are most sensitive to the economy in their voting behavior? 4) How does economic voting depend on the political context - in particular, whether a candidate is running for re-election, and whether the incumbent party also controls Congress? Our study includes the first county-level analysis of economic voting in presidential elections. We find the answers to our four questions are: 1) national conditions, by far; 2) the most recent year; 3) blacks, females, and the non-elderly; and 4) no.",
keywords = "Economic voting, President, Presidential election",
author = "Daniel Eisenberg and Jonathan Ketcham",
year = "2004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "497--521",
journal = "B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy",
issn = "1935-1682",
publisher = "Berkeley Electronic Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic voting in U.S. presidential elections

T2 - Who blames whom for what

AU - Eisenberg, Daniel

AU - Ketcham, Jonathan

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - In United States presidential elections, the incumbent party's fortunes depend significantly on recent economic conditions, as numerous studies have shown. Many details of how economic voting takes place, however, are still not well understood. Here we present evidence on four issues. 1) Which is more important for determining people's votes, national or local economic conditions? 2) What time frame do people consider in economic voting? 3) Which demographic groups are most sensitive to the economy in their voting behavior? 4) How does economic voting depend on the political context - in particular, whether a candidate is running for re-election, and whether the incumbent party also controls Congress? Our study includes the first county-level analysis of economic voting in presidential elections. We find the answers to our four questions are: 1) national conditions, by far; 2) the most recent year; 3) blacks, females, and the non-elderly; and 4) no.

AB - In United States presidential elections, the incumbent party's fortunes depend significantly on recent economic conditions, as numerous studies have shown. Many details of how economic voting takes place, however, are still not well understood. Here we present evidence on four issues. 1) Which is more important for determining people's votes, national or local economic conditions? 2) What time frame do people consider in economic voting? 3) Which demographic groups are most sensitive to the economy in their voting behavior? 4) How does economic voting depend on the political context - in particular, whether a candidate is running for re-election, and whether the incumbent party also controls Congress? Our study includes the first county-level analysis of economic voting in presidential elections. We find the answers to our four questions are: 1) national conditions, by far; 2) the most recent year; 3) blacks, females, and the non-elderly; and 4) no.

KW - Economic voting

KW - President

KW - Presidential election

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13444302922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13444302922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:13444302922

VL - 4

SP - 497

EP - 521

JO - B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy

JF - B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy

SN - 1935-1682

IS - 1

ER -