Economic profitability of social predation among wild chimpanzees

individual variation promotes cooperation

Ian Gilby, Lynn E. Eberly, Richard W. Wrangham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social predation (hunting in groups) presents a collective action problem. If nonhunters can obtain meat following a kill, it is unclear why an individual would choose to incur hunting costs. We explored this question using long-term data on chimpanzees from Kanyawara (Kibale National Park, Uganda) to test why hunting probability increases with chimpanzee party size. Social predation was not simply a function of the additive probability of intrinsic individual hunting rates. The potential for sharing meat with preferred social partners or sexually receptive females did not increase hunting probability, and there was no evidence of collaboration. Instead, individual variation in hunting motivation was critical for predicting hunting. Two 'impact' males had persistently high hunting rates, and hunts rarely occurred in their absence. When present, these males acted as hunting 'catalysts'. We argue that the profitability of social predation for chimpanzees differs from social carnivores, for which energy maximization is the expected goal. Since meat contains valuable micronutrients that complement a predominantly plant-based diet, obtaining even a small amount of meat is likely to be beneficial to a chimpanzee. We found that the probability that a male obtained meat increased with the number of hunters, and thus social predation was economically profitable. However, in the largest parties, hunters and nonhunters were equally likely to obtain meat, suggesting that there was incentive to refrain from hunting. Together, our results show that the catalytic action of impact males promotes cooperative hunting to a degree, but the collective action problem persists in large parties.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)351-360
Number of pages10
JournalAnimal Behaviour
Volume75
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

individual variation
Pan troglodytes
profitability
hunting
predation
meat
economics
collective action
plant-based diet
Uganda
catalysts
carnivores
cooperatives
co-operation
national parks
complement
carnivore
energy
incentive
national park

Keywords

  • by-product mutualism
  • chimpanzee
  • cooperative hunting
  • individual variation
  • payoff currency
  • predation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Economic profitability of social predation among wild chimpanzees : individual variation promotes cooperation. / Gilby, Ian; Eberly, Lynn E.; Wrangham, Richard W.

In: Animal Behaviour, Vol. 75, No. 2, 02.2008, p. 351-360.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b8e48980f561493197f3eb187957fc5d,
title = "Economic profitability of social predation among wild chimpanzees: individual variation promotes cooperation",
abstract = "Social predation (hunting in groups) presents a collective action problem. If nonhunters can obtain meat following a kill, it is unclear why an individual would choose to incur hunting costs. We explored this question using long-term data on chimpanzees from Kanyawara (Kibale National Park, Uganda) to test why hunting probability increases with chimpanzee party size. Social predation was not simply a function of the additive probability of intrinsic individual hunting rates. The potential for sharing meat with preferred social partners or sexually receptive females did not increase hunting probability, and there was no evidence of collaboration. Instead, individual variation in hunting motivation was critical for predicting hunting. Two 'impact' males had persistently high hunting rates, and hunts rarely occurred in their absence. When present, these males acted as hunting 'catalysts'. We argue that the profitability of social predation for chimpanzees differs from social carnivores, for which energy maximization is the expected goal. Since meat contains valuable micronutrients that complement a predominantly plant-based diet, obtaining even a small amount of meat is likely to be beneficial to a chimpanzee. We found that the probability that a male obtained meat increased with the number of hunters, and thus social predation was economically profitable. However, in the largest parties, hunters and nonhunters were equally likely to obtain meat, suggesting that there was incentive to refrain from hunting. Together, our results show that the catalytic action of impact males promotes cooperative hunting to a degree, but the collective action problem persists in large parties.",
keywords = "by-product mutualism, chimpanzee, cooperative hunting, individual variation, payoff currency, predation",
author = "Ian Gilby and Eberly, {Lynn E.} and Wrangham, {Richard W.}",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.06.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "351--360",
journal = "Animal Behaviour",
issn = "0003-3472",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic profitability of social predation among wild chimpanzees

T2 - individual variation promotes cooperation

AU - Gilby, Ian

AU - Eberly, Lynn E.

AU - Wrangham, Richard W.

PY - 2008/2

Y1 - 2008/2

N2 - Social predation (hunting in groups) presents a collective action problem. If nonhunters can obtain meat following a kill, it is unclear why an individual would choose to incur hunting costs. We explored this question using long-term data on chimpanzees from Kanyawara (Kibale National Park, Uganda) to test why hunting probability increases with chimpanzee party size. Social predation was not simply a function of the additive probability of intrinsic individual hunting rates. The potential for sharing meat with preferred social partners or sexually receptive females did not increase hunting probability, and there was no evidence of collaboration. Instead, individual variation in hunting motivation was critical for predicting hunting. Two 'impact' males had persistently high hunting rates, and hunts rarely occurred in their absence. When present, these males acted as hunting 'catalysts'. We argue that the profitability of social predation for chimpanzees differs from social carnivores, for which energy maximization is the expected goal. Since meat contains valuable micronutrients that complement a predominantly plant-based diet, obtaining even a small amount of meat is likely to be beneficial to a chimpanzee. We found that the probability that a male obtained meat increased with the number of hunters, and thus social predation was economically profitable. However, in the largest parties, hunters and nonhunters were equally likely to obtain meat, suggesting that there was incentive to refrain from hunting. Together, our results show that the catalytic action of impact males promotes cooperative hunting to a degree, but the collective action problem persists in large parties.

AB - Social predation (hunting in groups) presents a collective action problem. If nonhunters can obtain meat following a kill, it is unclear why an individual would choose to incur hunting costs. We explored this question using long-term data on chimpanzees from Kanyawara (Kibale National Park, Uganda) to test why hunting probability increases with chimpanzee party size. Social predation was not simply a function of the additive probability of intrinsic individual hunting rates. The potential for sharing meat with preferred social partners or sexually receptive females did not increase hunting probability, and there was no evidence of collaboration. Instead, individual variation in hunting motivation was critical for predicting hunting. Two 'impact' males had persistently high hunting rates, and hunts rarely occurred in their absence. When present, these males acted as hunting 'catalysts'. We argue that the profitability of social predation for chimpanzees differs from social carnivores, for which energy maximization is the expected goal. Since meat contains valuable micronutrients that complement a predominantly plant-based diet, obtaining even a small amount of meat is likely to be beneficial to a chimpanzee. We found that the probability that a male obtained meat increased with the number of hunters, and thus social predation was economically profitable. However, in the largest parties, hunters and nonhunters were equally likely to obtain meat, suggesting that there was incentive to refrain from hunting. Together, our results show that the catalytic action of impact males promotes cooperative hunting to a degree, but the collective action problem persists in large parties.

KW - by-product mutualism

KW - chimpanzee

KW - cooperative hunting

KW - individual variation

KW - payoff currency

KW - predation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38649090082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38649090082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.06.008

DO - 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.06.008

M3 - Article

VL - 75

SP - 351

EP - 360

JO - Animal Behaviour

JF - Animal Behaviour

SN - 0003-3472

IS - 2

ER -