Ecological ethics: Building a new tool kit for ecologists and biodiversity managers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ecological research and biodiversity management often raise ethical questions in areas that include responsibilities and duties to the scientific community, public welfare, research animals, species, and ecosystems. Answering these questions is challenging because ecologists and biodiversity managers do not have the equivalent of bioethics, an established field with a support network focused mainly on biomedicine, to guide them in making decisions. Environmental ethics provides some insight into environmental values and the duties these may impose on humans. But for the most part those in the field have not considered many of the common responsibilities and obligations that ecologists and managers have to the scientific profession or to public welfare. There is a need to bring ethicists, scientists, and biodiversity managers together in a collaborative effort to study and inform the methods of ethical analysis and problem solving in ecological research and biodiversity management. We present a series of cases that illustrate the kinds of ethical questions faced by researchers and biodiversity managers in practice. We argue for the creation of an extensive case database and a pluralistic and integrated ethical framework, one that draws from the theoretical (normative), research, animal, and environmental ethics traditions. These tools form the foundations of a new area of inquiry and practical ethical problem solving, that we call "ecological ethics."

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1803-1812
Number of pages10
JournalConservation Biology
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2005

Fingerprint

Biodiversity
ethics
ecologists
managers
Managers
biodiversity
laboratory animals
Animals
bioethics
environmental values
ecological value
Ecosystems
decision making
researchers
Decision making
ecosystems
ecosystem
animal
environmental ethics
responsibility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Ecological ethics : Building a new tool kit for ecologists and biodiversity managers. / Minteer, Ben; Collins, James.

In: Conservation Biology, Vol. 19, No. 6, 12.2005, p. 1803-1812.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d2bbf83d77c54cccb596b0bbdb5e3f1f,
title = "Ecological ethics: Building a new tool kit for ecologists and biodiversity managers",
abstract = "Ecological research and biodiversity management often raise ethical questions in areas that include responsibilities and duties to the scientific community, public welfare, research animals, species, and ecosystems. Answering these questions is challenging because ecologists and biodiversity managers do not have the equivalent of bioethics, an established field with a support network focused mainly on biomedicine, to guide them in making decisions. Environmental ethics provides some insight into environmental values and the duties these may impose on humans. But for the most part those in the field have not considered many of the common responsibilities and obligations that ecologists and managers have to the scientific profession or to public welfare. There is a need to bring ethicists, scientists, and biodiversity managers together in a collaborative effort to study and inform the methods of ethical analysis and problem solving in ecological research and biodiversity management. We present a series of cases that illustrate the kinds of ethical questions faced by researchers and biodiversity managers in practice. We argue for the creation of an extensive case database and a pluralistic and integrated ethical framework, one that draws from the theoretical (normative), research, animal, and environmental ethics traditions. These tools form the foundations of a new area of inquiry and practical ethical problem solving, that we call {"}ecological ethics.{"}",
author = "Ben Minteer and James Collins",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00281.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "1803--1812",
journal = "Conservation Biology",
issn = "0888-8892",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ecological ethics

T2 - Building a new tool kit for ecologists and biodiversity managers

AU - Minteer, Ben

AU - Collins, James

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - Ecological research and biodiversity management often raise ethical questions in areas that include responsibilities and duties to the scientific community, public welfare, research animals, species, and ecosystems. Answering these questions is challenging because ecologists and biodiversity managers do not have the equivalent of bioethics, an established field with a support network focused mainly on biomedicine, to guide them in making decisions. Environmental ethics provides some insight into environmental values and the duties these may impose on humans. But for the most part those in the field have not considered many of the common responsibilities and obligations that ecologists and managers have to the scientific profession or to public welfare. There is a need to bring ethicists, scientists, and biodiversity managers together in a collaborative effort to study and inform the methods of ethical analysis and problem solving in ecological research and biodiversity management. We present a series of cases that illustrate the kinds of ethical questions faced by researchers and biodiversity managers in practice. We argue for the creation of an extensive case database and a pluralistic and integrated ethical framework, one that draws from the theoretical (normative), research, animal, and environmental ethics traditions. These tools form the foundations of a new area of inquiry and practical ethical problem solving, that we call "ecological ethics."

AB - Ecological research and biodiversity management often raise ethical questions in areas that include responsibilities and duties to the scientific community, public welfare, research animals, species, and ecosystems. Answering these questions is challenging because ecologists and biodiversity managers do not have the equivalent of bioethics, an established field with a support network focused mainly on biomedicine, to guide them in making decisions. Environmental ethics provides some insight into environmental values and the duties these may impose on humans. But for the most part those in the field have not considered many of the common responsibilities and obligations that ecologists and managers have to the scientific profession or to public welfare. There is a need to bring ethicists, scientists, and biodiversity managers together in a collaborative effort to study and inform the methods of ethical analysis and problem solving in ecological research and biodiversity management. We present a series of cases that illustrate the kinds of ethical questions faced by researchers and biodiversity managers in practice. We argue for the creation of an extensive case database and a pluralistic and integrated ethical framework, one that draws from the theoretical (normative), research, animal, and environmental ethics traditions. These tools form the foundations of a new area of inquiry and practical ethical problem solving, that we call "ecological ethics."

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33244484328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33244484328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00281.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00281.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33244484328

VL - 19

SP - 1803

EP - 1812

JO - Conservation Biology

JF - Conservation Biology

SN - 0888-8892

IS - 6

ER -