@article{8fc727ca94144b2d9acbf7ef46afb398,
title = "EcoEvo-MAPS: An ecology and evolution assessment for introductory through advanced undergraduates",
abstract = "A new assessment tool, Ecology and Evolution-Measuring Achievement and Progression in Science or EcoEvo-MAPS, measures student thinking in ecology and evolution during an undergraduate course of study. EcoEvo-MAPS targets foundational concepts in ecology and evolution and uses a novel approach that asks students to evaluate a series of predictions, conclusions, or interpretations as likely or unlikely to be true given a specific scenario. We collected evidence of validity and reliability for EcoEvo-MAPS through an iterative process of faculty review, student interviews, and analyses of assessment data from more than 3000 students at 34 associate{\textquoteright}s-, bachelor{\textquoteright}s-, master{\textquoteright}s-, and doctoral-granting institutions. The 63 likely/unlikely statements range in difficulty and target student understanding of key concepts aligned with the Vision and Change report. This assessment provides departments with a tool to measure student thinking at different time points in the curriculum and provides data that can be used to inform curricular and instructional modifications.",
author = "Summers, {Mindi M.} and Couch, {Brian A.} and Knight, {Jennifer K.} and Brownell, {Sara E.} and Crowe, {Alison J.} and Katharine Semsar and Wright, {Christian D.} and Smith, {Michelle K.}",
note = "Funding Information: This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under grants DRL 0962805 and DUE 1322556, 1323010, and 1322364. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. We thank the faculty members who reviewed and commented on the questions; the faculty who administered the assessment; students who participated in interviews and pilots; Meghan Bathgate, Kathleen Brazeal, Man-Wai Chu, Kyla Flanagan, and Brian McGill for advice on statistical analyses; the 32 IRB committees who considered our request to pilot; and Karen Pelletreau, Erin Vinson, Elizabeth Trenckmann, Justin Lewin, Jonathan Dumont, Kenneth Akiha, MaryBeth Semosky, Gabrielle Holt, and Emilie Brigham for their participation and thoughtful discussions regarding this assessment. This research was considered exempt from institutional review (protocol 2015-06-07). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018, The American Society for Cell Biology. All rights reserved.",
year = "2018",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1187/cbe.17-02-0037",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
journal = "CBE Life Sciences Education",
issn = "1931-7913",
publisher = "American Society for Cell Biology",
number = "2",
}