TY - GEN
T1 - Early Prediction of Lithium-Ion Battery Cycle Life by Machine Learning Methods
AU - Mitra, Ankan
AU - Pan, Rong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 IEEE.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - For a lithium-ion battery, its cycle life is defined as the number of full charge cycles that a battery can undergo until its full charge capacity falls below 80% of the design capacity. In a recent study by Severson et al. [1], a large set of lithium-ion battery cycle life experiments were conducted and analyzed, and early cycle data were used to predict battery lives without any prior assumptions on degradation mechanism. In this paper, we reexamine the data and suggest additional features to the model, which also use early cycle data (up to the first 100 cycles), for a better battery cycle life prediction. We suggest an ensemble machine learning method that combines several classifiers such as the k-nearest neighbor classifier, neural networks, support vector machines and decision tree-based classifiers for classifying batteries to low or high lifetime category. It is found that our ensemble approach provides more robust predictions. For predicting cycle life, a support vector regression model is suggested, and we compare it with an elastic net-based regression model. It is found that SVR outperforms elastic net in terms of percentage prediction error.
AB - For a lithium-ion battery, its cycle life is defined as the number of full charge cycles that a battery can undergo until its full charge capacity falls below 80% of the design capacity. In a recent study by Severson et al. [1], a large set of lithium-ion battery cycle life experiments were conducted and analyzed, and early cycle data were used to predict battery lives without any prior assumptions on degradation mechanism. In this paper, we reexamine the data and suggest additional features to the model, which also use early cycle data (up to the first 100 cycles), for a better battery cycle life prediction. We suggest an ensemble machine learning method that combines several classifiers such as the k-nearest neighbor classifier, neural networks, support vector machines and decision tree-based classifiers for classifying batteries to low or high lifetime category. It is found that our ensemble approach provides more robust predictions. For predicting cycle life, a support vector regression model is suggested, and we compare it with an elastic net-based regression model. It is found that SVR outperforms elastic net in terms of percentage prediction error.
KW - degradation
KW - ensemble machine learning
KW - feature selection
KW - reliability prediction
KW - support vector regression
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139069824&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85139069824&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/RAMS51457.2022.9893916
DO - 10.1109/RAMS51457.2022.9893916
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85139069824
T3 - Proceedings - Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium
BT - 68th Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, RAMS 2022
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 68th Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, RAMS 2022
Y2 - 24 January 2022 through 27 January 2022
ER -