Drug courts and recidivism: The results of an evaluation using two comparison groups and multiple indicators of recidivism

Cassia Spohn, R. K. Piper, T. Martin, E. D. Frenzel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Increases in the number of drug offenders appearing in state and federal courts, coupled with mounting evidence of both the linkages between drug use and crime and the efficacy of drug treatment programs, led many jurisdictions to implement drug treatment courts. Although these courts vary on a number of dimensions, most are designed to reduce drug use and criminal behavior among drug-involved offenders. This study evaluates the effectiveness of one drug court-the Douglas County (Omaha), Nebraska Drug Court-in reducing offender recidivism. We use a variety of analytical techniques to compare drug court participants and offenders in two matched comparison groups on a number of measures of recidivism. Our results reveal that drug court participants have substantially lower rates of recidivism than traditionally adjudicated felony drug offenders, and that the differences in recidivism rates between drug court participants and drug offenders who participated in a diversion program prior to the implementation of the drug court disappeared once we controlled for the offender's assessed level of risk, as indicated by his/her LSI score.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)149-176
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Drug Issues
Volume31
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

drug
offender
evaluation
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Group
drug use
criminality
Crime
jurisdiction
offense
Research Design
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Drug courts and recidivism : The results of an evaluation using two comparison groups and multiple indicators of recidivism. / Spohn, Cassia; Piper, R. K.; Martin, T.; Frenzel, E. D.

In: Journal of Drug Issues, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2001, p. 149-176.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c0b54d55e39c4c749d5726b633af503f,
title = "Drug courts and recidivism: The results of an evaluation using two comparison groups and multiple indicators of recidivism",
abstract = "Increases in the number of drug offenders appearing in state and federal courts, coupled with mounting evidence of both the linkages between drug use and crime and the efficacy of drug treatment programs, led many jurisdictions to implement drug treatment courts. Although these courts vary on a number of dimensions, most are designed to reduce drug use and criminal behavior among drug-involved offenders. This study evaluates the effectiveness of one drug court-the Douglas County (Omaha), Nebraska Drug Court-in reducing offender recidivism. We use a variety of analytical techniques to compare drug court participants and offenders in two matched comparison groups on a number of measures of recidivism. Our results reveal that drug court participants have substantially lower rates of recidivism than traditionally adjudicated felony drug offenders, and that the differences in recidivism rates between drug court participants and drug offenders who participated in a diversion program prior to the implementation of the drug court disappeared once we controlled for the offender's assessed level of risk, as indicated by his/her LSI score.",
author = "Cassia Spohn and Piper, {R. K.} and T. Martin and Frenzel, {E. D.}",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "149--176",
journal = "Journal of Drug Issues",
issn = "0022-0426",
publisher = "Journal of Drug Issues Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Drug courts and recidivism

T2 - The results of an evaluation using two comparison groups and multiple indicators of recidivism

AU - Spohn, Cassia

AU - Piper, R. K.

AU - Martin, T.

AU - Frenzel, E. D.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Increases in the number of drug offenders appearing in state and federal courts, coupled with mounting evidence of both the linkages between drug use and crime and the efficacy of drug treatment programs, led many jurisdictions to implement drug treatment courts. Although these courts vary on a number of dimensions, most are designed to reduce drug use and criminal behavior among drug-involved offenders. This study evaluates the effectiveness of one drug court-the Douglas County (Omaha), Nebraska Drug Court-in reducing offender recidivism. We use a variety of analytical techniques to compare drug court participants and offenders in two matched comparison groups on a number of measures of recidivism. Our results reveal that drug court participants have substantially lower rates of recidivism than traditionally adjudicated felony drug offenders, and that the differences in recidivism rates between drug court participants and drug offenders who participated in a diversion program prior to the implementation of the drug court disappeared once we controlled for the offender's assessed level of risk, as indicated by his/her LSI score.

AB - Increases in the number of drug offenders appearing in state and federal courts, coupled with mounting evidence of both the linkages between drug use and crime and the efficacy of drug treatment programs, led many jurisdictions to implement drug treatment courts. Although these courts vary on a number of dimensions, most are designed to reduce drug use and criminal behavior among drug-involved offenders. This study evaluates the effectiveness of one drug court-the Douglas County (Omaha), Nebraska Drug Court-in reducing offender recidivism. We use a variety of analytical techniques to compare drug court participants and offenders in two matched comparison groups on a number of measures of recidivism. Our results reveal that drug court participants have substantially lower rates of recidivism than traditionally adjudicated felony drug offenders, and that the differences in recidivism rates between drug court participants and drug offenders who participated in a diversion program prior to the implementation of the drug court disappeared once we controlled for the offender's assessed level of risk, as indicated by his/her LSI score.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035047677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035047677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0035047677

VL - 31

SP - 149

EP - 176

JO - Journal of Drug Issues

JF - Journal of Drug Issues

SN - 0022-0426

IS - 1

ER -