Driving performance via exploration in changing environments: Evidence from formula one racing

Alessandro Marino, Paolo Aversa, Luiz Mesquita, Jaideep Anand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Until recently, scholars have customarily lumped multiple dimensions of environmental change into single constructs, and usually ascertained that the more the context changes, the more value firms derive from higher levels of exploration. In sync with more recent studies focusing on specific dimensions of change, in this paper we borrow theoretical elements from systems theory to examine the possibility that the reward to developing innovative product components may itself be eroded by implicit and yet burgeoning costs to fit the new component technology into existing architectures, thereby dampening system performance. Specifically, we theoretically assess how varying magnitudes of industry regulatory changes affect the optimum level of firm exploration, and propose-counterintuitively vis-à-vis past literature-that the more radical (i.e., competence destroying), as opposed to incremental (i.e., competence enhancing), these changes are, the more the optimum intensity of firm exploration recedes. Based on quantitative as well as qualitative empirical analyses from the Formula One racing industry, we precisely trace the observed performance outcomes back to the underlying logic of our theory, stressing that impaired capabilities to integrate the new component in the architecture redesign and time-based cognitive limitations both operate to inhibit the otherwise positive relationship between firm exploration and performance. In the end, we offer new insights to theory and practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1079-1100
Number of pages22
JournalOrganization Science
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

System theory
Industry
Costs
Regulatory change
Redesign
Reward
Logic
Incremental
Environmental change
Systems theory
Firm value

Keywords

  • Complexity
  • Environmental change
  • Exploration
  • Formula One
  • Performance
  • Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Driving performance via exploration in changing environments : Evidence from formula one racing. / Marino, Alessandro; Aversa, Paolo; Mesquita, Luiz; Anand, Jaideep.

In: Organization Science, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2015, p. 1079-1100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Marino, Alessandro ; Aversa, Paolo ; Mesquita, Luiz ; Anand, Jaideep. / Driving performance via exploration in changing environments : Evidence from formula one racing. In: Organization Science. 2015 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 1079-1100.
@article{f559a9c59a6047d08f1f2930ab1ae2e4,
title = "Driving performance via exploration in changing environments: Evidence from formula one racing",
abstract = "Until recently, scholars have customarily lumped multiple dimensions of environmental change into single constructs, and usually ascertained that the more the context changes, the more value firms derive from higher levels of exploration. In sync with more recent studies focusing on specific dimensions of change, in this paper we borrow theoretical elements from systems theory to examine the possibility that the reward to developing innovative product components may itself be eroded by implicit and yet burgeoning costs to fit the new component technology into existing architectures, thereby dampening system performance. Specifically, we theoretically assess how varying magnitudes of industry regulatory changes affect the optimum level of firm exploration, and propose-counterintuitively vis-{\`a}-vis past literature-that the more radical (i.e., competence destroying), as opposed to incremental (i.e., competence enhancing), these changes are, the more the optimum intensity of firm exploration recedes. Based on quantitative as well as qualitative empirical analyses from the Formula One racing industry, we precisely trace the observed performance outcomes back to the underlying logic of our theory, stressing that impaired capabilities to integrate the new component in the architecture redesign and time-based cognitive limitations both operate to inhibit the otherwise positive relationship between firm exploration and performance. In the end, we offer new insights to theory and practice.",
keywords = "Complexity, Environmental change, Exploration, Formula One, Performance, Technology",
author = "Alessandro Marino and Paolo Aversa and Luiz Mesquita and Jaideep Anand",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1287/orsc.2015.0984",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "1079--1100",
journal = "Organization Science",
issn = "1047-7039",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Driving performance via exploration in changing environments

T2 - Evidence from formula one racing

AU - Marino, Alessandro

AU - Aversa, Paolo

AU - Mesquita, Luiz

AU - Anand, Jaideep

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Until recently, scholars have customarily lumped multiple dimensions of environmental change into single constructs, and usually ascertained that the more the context changes, the more value firms derive from higher levels of exploration. In sync with more recent studies focusing on specific dimensions of change, in this paper we borrow theoretical elements from systems theory to examine the possibility that the reward to developing innovative product components may itself be eroded by implicit and yet burgeoning costs to fit the new component technology into existing architectures, thereby dampening system performance. Specifically, we theoretically assess how varying magnitudes of industry regulatory changes affect the optimum level of firm exploration, and propose-counterintuitively vis-à-vis past literature-that the more radical (i.e., competence destroying), as opposed to incremental (i.e., competence enhancing), these changes are, the more the optimum intensity of firm exploration recedes. Based on quantitative as well as qualitative empirical analyses from the Formula One racing industry, we precisely trace the observed performance outcomes back to the underlying logic of our theory, stressing that impaired capabilities to integrate the new component in the architecture redesign and time-based cognitive limitations both operate to inhibit the otherwise positive relationship between firm exploration and performance. In the end, we offer new insights to theory and practice.

AB - Until recently, scholars have customarily lumped multiple dimensions of environmental change into single constructs, and usually ascertained that the more the context changes, the more value firms derive from higher levels of exploration. In sync with more recent studies focusing on specific dimensions of change, in this paper we borrow theoretical elements from systems theory to examine the possibility that the reward to developing innovative product components may itself be eroded by implicit and yet burgeoning costs to fit the new component technology into existing architectures, thereby dampening system performance. Specifically, we theoretically assess how varying magnitudes of industry regulatory changes affect the optimum level of firm exploration, and propose-counterintuitively vis-à-vis past literature-that the more radical (i.e., competence destroying), as opposed to incremental (i.e., competence enhancing), these changes are, the more the optimum intensity of firm exploration recedes. Based on quantitative as well as qualitative empirical analyses from the Formula One racing industry, we precisely trace the observed performance outcomes back to the underlying logic of our theory, stressing that impaired capabilities to integrate the new component in the architecture redesign and time-based cognitive limitations both operate to inhibit the otherwise positive relationship between firm exploration and performance. In the end, we offer new insights to theory and practice.

KW - Complexity

KW - Environmental change

KW - Exploration

KW - Formula One

KW - Performance

KW - Technology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84980315383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84980315383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1287/orsc.2015.0984

DO - 10.1287/orsc.2015.0984

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84980315383

VL - 26

SP - 1079

EP - 1100

JO - Organization Science

JF - Organization Science

SN - 1047-7039

IS - 4

ER -