Drainage network reveals patterns and history of active deformation in the eastern Greater Caucasus

Adam M. Forte, Kelin Whipple, Eric Cowgill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Greater Caucasus Mountains are a young (~5 m.y. old) orogen within the Arabia-Eurasia collision zone that contains the highest peaks in Europe and has an unusual topographic form for a doubly vergent orogen. In the east-central part (45°E-49°E), the range is nearly symmetric in terms of prowedge and retrowedge widths and the drainage divide is much closer to the southern margin of the range (prowedge side) than it is to the northern margin (retrowedge side). Moreover, the divide does not coincide with the topographic crest, but rather the crest is both shifted northward by as much as 40 km and traversed by several large north-flowing rivers. Both the topographic crest and drainage divide appear to coincide with zones of active rock uplift, because they are characterized by bands of high local relief and normalized channel steepness values (>300). This uplift pattern could result from a synchronous initiation of the two uplift zones or propagation of deformation either northward or southward. The two propagating scenarios differ fundamentally in their predictions for the relative ages of topographic features; northward propagation predicts that the topographic crest is younger than the drainage divide, and the southward scenario predicts the converse. Because available geologic and topographic data are consistent with both propagation directions, we use a landscape evolution model to test all three scenarios. Model results indicate that the current topography and drainage network is best explained by a northward propagation of deformation from the south flank into the interior of the east-central Greater Caucasus. Such propagation implies recent out-of-sequence deformation within the Greater Caucasus due to reactivation or development of new structures within the core of the orogen. It remains unclear if such deformation is a transient response to an accretion cycle or stems from a fundamental change in the structural architecture of the orogen.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1343-1364
Number of pages22
JournalGeosphere
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

drainage network
uplift
drainage
history
collision zone
landscape evolution
reactivation
relief
accretion
topography
mountain
prediction
river
rock
young

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geology
  • Stratigraphy

Cite this

Drainage network reveals patterns and history of active deformation in the eastern Greater Caucasus. / Forte, Adam M.; Whipple, Kelin; Cowgill, Eric.

In: Geosphere, Vol. 11, No. 5, 2015, p. 1343-1364.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e2f8fcfd1ce0411c8299807b4b2312db,
title = "Drainage network reveals patterns and history of active deformation in the eastern Greater Caucasus",
abstract = "The Greater Caucasus Mountains are a young (~5 m.y. old) orogen within the Arabia-Eurasia collision zone that contains the highest peaks in Europe and has an unusual topographic form for a doubly vergent orogen. In the east-central part (45°E-49°E), the range is nearly symmetric in terms of prowedge and retrowedge widths and the drainage divide is much closer to the southern margin of the range (prowedge side) than it is to the northern margin (retrowedge side). Moreover, the divide does not coincide with the topographic crest, but rather the crest is both shifted northward by as much as 40 km and traversed by several large north-flowing rivers. Both the topographic crest and drainage divide appear to coincide with zones of active rock uplift, because they are characterized by bands of high local relief and normalized channel steepness values (>300). This uplift pattern could result from a synchronous initiation of the two uplift zones or propagation of deformation either northward or southward. The two propagating scenarios differ fundamentally in their predictions for the relative ages of topographic features; northward propagation predicts that the topographic crest is younger than the drainage divide, and the southward scenario predicts the converse. Because available geologic and topographic data are consistent with both propagation directions, we use a landscape evolution model to test all three scenarios. Model results indicate that the current topography and drainage network is best explained by a northward propagation of deformation from the south flank into the interior of the east-central Greater Caucasus. Such propagation implies recent out-of-sequence deformation within the Greater Caucasus due to reactivation or development of new structures within the core of the orogen. It remains unclear if such deformation is a transient response to an accretion cycle or stems from a fundamental change in the structural architecture of the orogen.",
author = "Forte, {Adam M.} and Kelin Whipple and Eric Cowgill",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1130/GES01121.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "1343--1364",
journal = "Geosphere",
issn = "1553-040X",
publisher = "Geological Society of America",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Drainage network reveals patterns and history of active deformation in the eastern Greater Caucasus

AU - Forte, Adam M.

AU - Whipple, Kelin

AU - Cowgill, Eric

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The Greater Caucasus Mountains are a young (~5 m.y. old) orogen within the Arabia-Eurasia collision zone that contains the highest peaks in Europe and has an unusual topographic form for a doubly vergent orogen. In the east-central part (45°E-49°E), the range is nearly symmetric in terms of prowedge and retrowedge widths and the drainage divide is much closer to the southern margin of the range (prowedge side) than it is to the northern margin (retrowedge side). Moreover, the divide does not coincide with the topographic crest, but rather the crest is both shifted northward by as much as 40 km and traversed by several large north-flowing rivers. Both the topographic crest and drainage divide appear to coincide with zones of active rock uplift, because they are characterized by bands of high local relief and normalized channel steepness values (>300). This uplift pattern could result from a synchronous initiation of the two uplift zones or propagation of deformation either northward or southward. The two propagating scenarios differ fundamentally in their predictions for the relative ages of topographic features; northward propagation predicts that the topographic crest is younger than the drainage divide, and the southward scenario predicts the converse. Because available geologic and topographic data are consistent with both propagation directions, we use a landscape evolution model to test all three scenarios. Model results indicate that the current topography and drainage network is best explained by a northward propagation of deformation from the south flank into the interior of the east-central Greater Caucasus. Such propagation implies recent out-of-sequence deformation within the Greater Caucasus due to reactivation or development of new structures within the core of the orogen. It remains unclear if such deformation is a transient response to an accretion cycle or stems from a fundamental change in the structural architecture of the orogen.

AB - The Greater Caucasus Mountains are a young (~5 m.y. old) orogen within the Arabia-Eurasia collision zone that contains the highest peaks in Europe and has an unusual topographic form for a doubly vergent orogen. In the east-central part (45°E-49°E), the range is nearly symmetric in terms of prowedge and retrowedge widths and the drainage divide is much closer to the southern margin of the range (prowedge side) than it is to the northern margin (retrowedge side). Moreover, the divide does not coincide with the topographic crest, but rather the crest is both shifted northward by as much as 40 km and traversed by several large north-flowing rivers. Both the topographic crest and drainage divide appear to coincide with zones of active rock uplift, because they are characterized by bands of high local relief and normalized channel steepness values (>300). This uplift pattern could result from a synchronous initiation of the two uplift zones or propagation of deformation either northward or southward. The two propagating scenarios differ fundamentally in their predictions for the relative ages of topographic features; northward propagation predicts that the topographic crest is younger than the drainage divide, and the southward scenario predicts the converse. Because available geologic and topographic data are consistent with both propagation directions, we use a landscape evolution model to test all three scenarios. Model results indicate that the current topography and drainage network is best explained by a northward propagation of deformation from the south flank into the interior of the east-central Greater Caucasus. Such propagation implies recent out-of-sequence deformation within the Greater Caucasus due to reactivation or development of new structures within the core of the orogen. It remains unclear if such deformation is a transient response to an accretion cycle or stems from a fundamental change in the structural architecture of the orogen.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947738638&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947738638&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1130/GES01121.1

DO - 10.1130/GES01121.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84947738638

VL - 11

SP - 1343

EP - 1364

JO - Geosphere

JF - Geosphere

SN - 1553-040X

IS - 5

ER -