Downtown revitalization in the era of millennials

how developer perceptions of millennial market demands are shaping urban landscapes

Meagan Ehlenz, Deirdre Pfeiffer, Genevieve Pearthree

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Downtown Phoenix and Houston are changing. They are not dense, historic downtowns; instead, they reflect contemporary downtown growth in sprawling cities. Both cities have reimagined their downtowns, leveraging vacant land, new construction, and infill projects. Through this process, developers are shaping downtown in response to market demand. This research explores how developers in two Sun Belt cities are thinking about Millennials and cementing their preferences into rapidly changing downtowns. We triangulate data from the U.S. Census, regional media, and interviews with 22 downtown development experts. We find developers respond to Millennial preferences in several ways. They are endowing their downtown projects with a greater sense of place and diversity of activities. However, there is a social cost: underlying concerns include rising housing costs and gentrification in the downtowns and reduced demand for housing in the suburbs, particularly if Millennials elect to stay downtown for the long term.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalUrban Geography
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

city center
market
sense of place
gentrification
infill
cost
census
housing
demand
city
urban landscape
costs
suburb
project
expert
interview

Keywords

  • affordable housing
  • centralization
  • downtown revitalization
  • Millennial migration
  • Urban revitalization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

@article{68433171bb39488db087a9a8344e2888,
title = "Downtown revitalization in the era of millennials: how developer perceptions of millennial market demands are shaping urban landscapes",
abstract = "Downtown Phoenix and Houston are changing. They are not dense, historic downtowns; instead, they reflect contemporary downtown growth in sprawling cities. Both cities have reimagined their downtowns, leveraging vacant land, new construction, and infill projects. Through this process, developers are shaping downtown in response to market demand. This research explores how developers in two Sun Belt cities are thinking about Millennials and cementing their preferences into rapidly changing downtowns. We triangulate data from the U.S. Census, regional media, and interviews with 22 downtown development experts. We find developers respond to Millennial preferences in several ways. They are endowing their downtown projects with a greater sense of place and diversity of activities. However, there is a social cost: underlying concerns include rising housing costs and gentrification in the downtowns and reduced demand for housing in the suburbs, particularly if Millennials elect to stay downtown for the long term.",
keywords = "affordable housing, centralization, downtown revitalization, Millennial migration, Urban revitalization",
author = "Meagan Ehlenz and Deirdre Pfeiffer and Genevieve Pearthree",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/02723638.2019.1647062",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Urban Geography",
issn = "0272-3638",
publisher = "Bellwether Publishing, Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Downtown revitalization in the era of millennials

T2 - how developer perceptions of millennial market demands are shaping urban landscapes

AU - Ehlenz, Meagan

AU - Pfeiffer, Deirdre

AU - Pearthree, Genevieve

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Downtown Phoenix and Houston are changing. They are not dense, historic downtowns; instead, they reflect contemporary downtown growth in sprawling cities. Both cities have reimagined their downtowns, leveraging vacant land, new construction, and infill projects. Through this process, developers are shaping downtown in response to market demand. This research explores how developers in two Sun Belt cities are thinking about Millennials and cementing their preferences into rapidly changing downtowns. We triangulate data from the U.S. Census, regional media, and interviews with 22 downtown development experts. We find developers respond to Millennial preferences in several ways. They are endowing their downtown projects with a greater sense of place and diversity of activities. However, there is a social cost: underlying concerns include rising housing costs and gentrification in the downtowns and reduced demand for housing in the suburbs, particularly if Millennials elect to stay downtown for the long term.

AB - Downtown Phoenix and Houston are changing. They are not dense, historic downtowns; instead, they reflect contemporary downtown growth in sprawling cities. Both cities have reimagined their downtowns, leveraging vacant land, new construction, and infill projects. Through this process, developers are shaping downtown in response to market demand. This research explores how developers in two Sun Belt cities are thinking about Millennials and cementing their preferences into rapidly changing downtowns. We triangulate data from the U.S. Census, regional media, and interviews with 22 downtown development experts. We find developers respond to Millennial preferences in several ways. They are endowing their downtown projects with a greater sense of place and diversity of activities. However, there is a social cost: underlying concerns include rising housing costs and gentrification in the downtowns and reduced demand for housing in the suburbs, particularly if Millennials elect to stay downtown for the long term.

KW - affordable housing

KW - centralization

KW - downtown revitalization

KW - Millennial migration

KW - Urban revitalization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070515204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070515204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02723638.2019.1647062

DO - 10.1080/02723638.2019.1647062

M3 - Article

JO - Urban Geography

JF - Urban Geography

SN - 0272-3638

ER -