Dominance, Prosocial Orientation, and Female Preferences: Do Nice Guys Really Finish Last?

Lauri A. Jensen-Campbell, William G. Graziano, Stephen West

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

128 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Three multimethod studies (total N = 348) probed the hypothesis that women's attraction to men would be influenced by male prosocial orientation. In Study 1, prosocial men were rated as more physically and sexually attractive, socially desirable, and desirable as dates than were nonprosocial men. Dominant men were no more attractive than low-dominance men, and male dominance did not interact with male prosocial orientation in eliciting attraction from women. In Study 2, prosocial orientation was manipulated to avoid "personalism," but still affected attraction. Across all measures attraction was an interactive function of dominance and prosocial tendencies. Dominance alone did not increase any form of attraction measured. In Study 3, male prosocial tendencies and dominance interacted to affect women's attraction to men. Results are discussed in terms of the place of altruism and dominance in evolutionary approaches to human interpersonal attraction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)427-440
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume68
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 1995

Fingerprint

Altruism
altruism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Dominance, Prosocial Orientation, and Female Preferences : Do Nice Guys Really Finish Last? / Jensen-Campbell, Lauri A.; Graziano, William G.; West, Stephen.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 68, No. 3, 03.1995, p. 427-440.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fe133e1c748b442ba959077724879708,
title = "Dominance, Prosocial Orientation, and Female Preferences: Do Nice Guys Really Finish Last?",
abstract = "Three multimethod studies (total N = 348) probed the hypothesis that women's attraction to men would be influenced by male prosocial orientation. In Study 1, prosocial men were rated as more physically and sexually attractive, socially desirable, and desirable as dates than were nonprosocial men. Dominant men were no more attractive than low-dominance men, and male dominance did not interact with male prosocial orientation in eliciting attraction from women. In Study 2, prosocial orientation was manipulated to avoid {"}personalism,{"} but still affected attraction. Across all measures attraction was an interactive function of dominance and prosocial tendencies. Dominance alone did not increase any form of attraction measured. In Study 3, male prosocial tendencies and dominance interacted to affect women's attraction to men. Results are discussed in terms of the place of altruism and dominance in evolutionary approaches to human interpersonal attraction.",
author = "Jensen-Campbell, {Lauri A.} and Graziano, {William G.} and Stephen West",
year = "1995",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "427--440",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dominance, Prosocial Orientation, and Female Preferences

T2 - Do Nice Guys Really Finish Last?

AU - Jensen-Campbell, Lauri A.

AU - Graziano, William G.

AU - West, Stephen

PY - 1995/3

Y1 - 1995/3

N2 - Three multimethod studies (total N = 348) probed the hypothesis that women's attraction to men would be influenced by male prosocial orientation. In Study 1, prosocial men were rated as more physically and sexually attractive, socially desirable, and desirable as dates than were nonprosocial men. Dominant men were no more attractive than low-dominance men, and male dominance did not interact with male prosocial orientation in eliciting attraction from women. In Study 2, prosocial orientation was manipulated to avoid "personalism," but still affected attraction. Across all measures attraction was an interactive function of dominance and prosocial tendencies. Dominance alone did not increase any form of attraction measured. In Study 3, male prosocial tendencies and dominance interacted to affect women's attraction to men. Results are discussed in terms of the place of altruism and dominance in evolutionary approaches to human interpersonal attraction.

AB - Three multimethod studies (total N = 348) probed the hypothesis that women's attraction to men would be influenced by male prosocial orientation. In Study 1, prosocial men were rated as more physically and sexually attractive, socially desirable, and desirable as dates than were nonprosocial men. Dominant men were no more attractive than low-dominance men, and male dominance did not interact with male prosocial orientation in eliciting attraction from women. In Study 2, prosocial orientation was manipulated to avoid "personalism," but still affected attraction. Across all measures attraction was an interactive function of dominance and prosocial tendencies. Dominance alone did not increase any form of attraction measured. In Study 3, male prosocial tendencies and dominance interacted to affect women's attraction to men. Results are discussed in terms of the place of altruism and dominance in evolutionary approaches to human interpersonal attraction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21844513248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21844513248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:21844513248

VL - 68

SP - 427

EP - 440

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 3

ER -