Doing “Well” or Doing “Good”: What Audience Analytics Reveal About Journalism’s Competing Goals

Jacob L. Nelson, Edson C. Tandoc

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Journalism research frequently takes the form of ethnographic case studies. Because ethnographic data collection tends to be limited to months or even weeks, these studies are often unable to uncover how journalism changes over time. Our study addresses this gap by drawing on ethnographic data collected from a large, metropolitan newspaper in 2013 and again in 2016. In doing so, it answers the question: How has a newspaper’s relationship with online audience analytics changed? Our findings show that audience metrics continue to play an important role in the news production process. However, the adoption of online metrics has been less universal and deliberate than the paper’s staff originally assumed it would be. Drawing on market information regime and normalization literature, we conclude that ambivalence about these analytics has made explicit the idea that journalists face two goals they perceive as mutually exclusive: the pursuit of a mass audience and the aspiration to provide mission-driven reporting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1960-1976
Number of pages17
JournalJournalism Studies
Volume20
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

journalism
newspaper
production process
normalization
ambivalence
journalist
news
regime
staff
market
time
literature

Keywords

  • Audience metrics
  • ethnography
  • journalism
  • news audiences
  • news production

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

Doing “Well” or Doing “Good” : What Audience Analytics Reveal About Journalism’s Competing Goals. / Nelson, Jacob L.; Tandoc, Edson C.

In: Journalism Studies, Vol. 20, No. 13, 01.01.2019, p. 1960-1976.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0528b06d268c458f8f697060047e63cb,
title = "Doing “Well” or Doing “Good”: What Audience Analytics Reveal About Journalism’s Competing Goals",
abstract = "Journalism research frequently takes the form of ethnographic case studies. Because ethnographic data collection tends to be limited to months or even weeks, these studies are often unable to uncover how journalism changes over time. Our study addresses this gap by drawing on ethnographic data collected from a large, metropolitan newspaper in 2013 and again in 2016. In doing so, it answers the question: How has a newspaper’s relationship with online audience analytics changed? Our findings show that audience metrics continue to play an important role in the news production process. However, the adoption of online metrics has been less universal and deliberate than the paper’s staff originally assumed it would be. Drawing on market information regime and normalization literature, we conclude that ambivalence about these analytics has made explicit the idea that journalists face two goals they perceive as mutually exclusive: the pursuit of a mass audience and the aspiration to provide mission-driven reporting.",
keywords = "Audience metrics, ethnography, journalism, news audiences, news production",
author = "Nelson, {Jacob L.} and Tandoc, {Edson C.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/1461670X.2018.1547122",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "1960--1976",
journal = "Journalism Studies",
issn = "1461-670X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Doing “Well” or Doing “Good”

T2 - What Audience Analytics Reveal About Journalism’s Competing Goals

AU - Nelson, Jacob L.

AU - Tandoc, Edson C.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Journalism research frequently takes the form of ethnographic case studies. Because ethnographic data collection tends to be limited to months or even weeks, these studies are often unable to uncover how journalism changes over time. Our study addresses this gap by drawing on ethnographic data collected from a large, metropolitan newspaper in 2013 and again in 2016. In doing so, it answers the question: How has a newspaper’s relationship with online audience analytics changed? Our findings show that audience metrics continue to play an important role in the news production process. However, the adoption of online metrics has been less universal and deliberate than the paper’s staff originally assumed it would be. Drawing on market information regime and normalization literature, we conclude that ambivalence about these analytics has made explicit the idea that journalists face two goals they perceive as mutually exclusive: the pursuit of a mass audience and the aspiration to provide mission-driven reporting.

AB - Journalism research frequently takes the form of ethnographic case studies. Because ethnographic data collection tends to be limited to months or even weeks, these studies are often unable to uncover how journalism changes over time. Our study addresses this gap by drawing on ethnographic data collected from a large, metropolitan newspaper in 2013 and again in 2016. In doing so, it answers the question: How has a newspaper’s relationship with online audience analytics changed? Our findings show that audience metrics continue to play an important role in the news production process. However, the adoption of online metrics has been less universal and deliberate than the paper’s staff originally assumed it would be. Drawing on market information regime and normalization literature, we conclude that ambivalence about these analytics has made explicit the idea that journalists face two goals they perceive as mutually exclusive: the pursuit of a mass audience and the aspiration to provide mission-driven reporting.

KW - Audience metrics

KW - ethnography

KW - journalism

KW - news audiences

KW - news production

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057523243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057523243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1461670X.2018.1547122

DO - 10.1080/1461670X.2018.1547122

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85057523243

VL - 20

SP - 1960

EP - 1976

JO - Journalism Studies

JF - Journalism Studies

SN - 1461-670X

IS - 13

ER -