Doing for the Greater Good: What Price, in Academe?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In discussing how merit is commonly judged in academia, my focus in this article is not on dimensions that are currently considered but on those that warrant more attention. Grounded in suggestions offered by Sternberg, I argue here for increased recognition of faculty’s commitment to intrinsic values—focused on community and relationships—and not just extrinsic ones that connote personal fame or status. I first summarize evidence of disillusionment among today’s promising young scholars and then provide exemplars of role models who have, in fact, maintained high standards in both intrinsic and extrinsic domains. I illustrate how commitment to intrinsic goals in everyday professional responsibilities (such as peer reviews or teaching) can come at the cost to personal success and suggest ways of providing appropriate recognition in faculty evaluations. At the macro level, I describe how positive work communities can enhance productivity, foster resilience, and mitigate burnout in the competitive world of contemporary academe. Finally, I underscore the critical role of psychologists in spurring greater dialogue about the messages conveyed by higher education, to the next generation, about what truly matters in making “a life well lived”.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1153-1158
Number of pages6
JournalPerspectives on Psychological Science
Volume12
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2017

Fingerprint

Peer Review
Teaching
Psychology
Education
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • altruism
  • anxiety
  • compassion
  • culture
  • education
  • ethics
  • generosity
  • integrity
  • intrinsic goals
  • positive psychology
  • resilience
  • stress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Doing for the Greater Good : What Price, in Academe? / Luthar, Suniya.

In: Perspectives on Psychological Science, Vol. 12, No. 6, 01.11.2017, p. 1153-1158.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{198baa7f09f74974bd1e9b15b47e7bcf,
title = "Doing for the Greater Good: What Price, in Academe?",
abstract = "In discussing how merit is commonly judged in academia, my focus in this article is not on dimensions that are currently considered but on those that warrant more attention. Grounded in suggestions offered by Sternberg, I argue here for increased recognition of faculty’s commitment to intrinsic values—focused on community and relationships—and not just extrinsic ones that connote personal fame or status. I first summarize evidence of disillusionment among today’s promising young scholars and then provide exemplars of role models who have, in fact, maintained high standards in both intrinsic and extrinsic domains. I illustrate how commitment to intrinsic goals in everyday professional responsibilities (such as peer reviews or teaching) can come at the cost to personal success and suggest ways of providing appropriate recognition in faculty evaluations. At the macro level, I describe how positive work communities can enhance productivity, foster resilience, and mitigate burnout in the competitive world of contemporary academe. Finally, I underscore the critical role of psychologists in spurring greater dialogue about the messages conveyed by higher education, to the next generation, about what truly matters in making “a life well lived”.",
keywords = "altruism, anxiety, compassion, culture, education, ethics, generosity, integrity, intrinsic goals, positive psychology, resilience, stress",
author = "Suniya Luthar",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1745691617727863",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "1153--1158",
journal = "Perspectives on Psychological Science",
issn = "1745-6916",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Doing for the Greater Good

T2 - What Price, in Academe?

AU - Luthar, Suniya

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - In discussing how merit is commonly judged in academia, my focus in this article is not on dimensions that are currently considered but on those that warrant more attention. Grounded in suggestions offered by Sternberg, I argue here for increased recognition of faculty’s commitment to intrinsic values—focused on community and relationships—and not just extrinsic ones that connote personal fame or status. I first summarize evidence of disillusionment among today’s promising young scholars and then provide exemplars of role models who have, in fact, maintained high standards in both intrinsic and extrinsic domains. I illustrate how commitment to intrinsic goals in everyday professional responsibilities (such as peer reviews or teaching) can come at the cost to personal success and suggest ways of providing appropriate recognition in faculty evaluations. At the macro level, I describe how positive work communities can enhance productivity, foster resilience, and mitigate burnout in the competitive world of contemporary academe. Finally, I underscore the critical role of psychologists in spurring greater dialogue about the messages conveyed by higher education, to the next generation, about what truly matters in making “a life well lived”.

AB - In discussing how merit is commonly judged in academia, my focus in this article is not on dimensions that are currently considered but on those that warrant more attention. Grounded in suggestions offered by Sternberg, I argue here for increased recognition of faculty’s commitment to intrinsic values—focused on community and relationships—and not just extrinsic ones that connote personal fame or status. I first summarize evidence of disillusionment among today’s promising young scholars and then provide exemplars of role models who have, in fact, maintained high standards in both intrinsic and extrinsic domains. I illustrate how commitment to intrinsic goals in everyday professional responsibilities (such as peer reviews or teaching) can come at the cost to personal success and suggest ways of providing appropriate recognition in faculty evaluations. At the macro level, I describe how positive work communities can enhance productivity, foster resilience, and mitigate burnout in the competitive world of contemporary academe. Finally, I underscore the critical role of psychologists in spurring greater dialogue about the messages conveyed by higher education, to the next generation, about what truly matters in making “a life well lived”.

KW - altruism

KW - anxiety

KW - compassion

KW - culture

KW - education

KW - ethics

KW - generosity

KW - integrity

KW - intrinsic goals

KW - positive psychology

KW - resilience

KW - stress

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034423034&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034423034&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1745691617727863

DO - 10.1177/1745691617727863

M3 - Article

C2 - 29149579

AN - SCOPUS:85034423034

VL - 12

SP - 1153

EP - 1158

JO - Perspectives on Psychological Science

JF - Perspectives on Psychological Science

SN - 1745-6916

IS - 6

ER -