Does stakeholder management have a dark side?

Carmelo Cennamo, Pascual Berrone, Luis Gomez-Mejia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article is a first attempt to line out the conditions under which executives might have a real selfinterest in pursuing a broad stakeholder management (SM) orientation to enlarge their power. We suggest that managers have wider latitude of action under an SM approach, even when this is instrumental to financial performance. The causally ambiguity of the performance effects of idiosyncratic relationships with stakeholders not only makes SM strategy difficult for competitors to imitate but also increases managerial discretion. When managers use this situation for their own benefit, they can undermine the purported goals of the SM approach. By analyzing some of the factors that might lead to such disfunctionalities, this article advances a theory of the potential dark side of SM.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)491-507
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume89
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009

Fingerprint

stakeholder
management
manager
performance
Stakeholder management
Stakeholders
Managers

Keywords

  • Causal ambiguity
  • Corporate governance
  • Managerial discretion
  • Stakeholder management
  • Stakeholder theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Law
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Does stakeholder management have a dark side? / Cennamo, Carmelo; Berrone, Pascual; Gomez-Mejia, Luis.

In: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 89, No. 4, 03.2009, p. 491-507.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cennamo, Carmelo ; Berrone, Pascual ; Gomez-Mejia, Luis. / Does stakeholder management have a dark side?. In: Journal of Business Ethics. 2009 ; Vol. 89, No. 4. pp. 491-507.
@article{85fdda29c1834058b86bb34ff4892c58,
title = "Does stakeholder management have a dark side?",
abstract = "This article is a first attempt to line out the conditions under which executives might have a real selfinterest in pursuing a broad stakeholder management (SM) orientation to enlarge their power. We suggest that managers have wider latitude of action under an SM approach, even when this is instrumental to financial performance. The causally ambiguity of the performance effects of idiosyncratic relationships with stakeholders not only makes SM strategy difficult for competitors to imitate but also increases managerial discretion. When managers use this situation for their own benefit, they can undermine the purported goals of the SM approach. By analyzing some of the factors that might lead to such disfunctionalities, this article advances a theory of the potential dark side of SM.",
keywords = "Causal ambiguity, Corporate governance, Managerial discretion, Stakeholder management, Stakeholder theory",
author = "Carmelo Cennamo and Pascual Berrone and Luis Gomez-Mejia",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s10551-008-0012-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "491--507",
journal = "Journal of Business Ethics",
issn = "0167-4544",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does stakeholder management have a dark side?

AU - Cennamo, Carmelo

AU - Berrone, Pascual

AU - Gomez-Mejia, Luis

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - This article is a first attempt to line out the conditions under which executives might have a real selfinterest in pursuing a broad stakeholder management (SM) orientation to enlarge their power. We suggest that managers have wider latitude of action under an SM approach, even when this is instrumental to financial performance. The causally ambiguity of the performance effects of idiosyncratic relationships with stakeholders not only makes SM strategy difficult for competitors to imitate but also increases managerial discretion. When managers use this situation for their own benefit, they can undermine the purported goals of the SM approach. By analyzing some of the factors that might lead to such disfunctionalities, this article advances a theory of the potential dark side of SM.

AB - This article is a first attempt to line out the conditions under which executives might have a real selfinterest in pursuing a broad stakeholder management (SM) orientation to enlarge their power. We suggest that managers have wider latitude of action under an SM approach, even when this is instrumental to financial performance. The causally ambiguity of the performance effects of idiosyncratic relationships with stakeholders not only makes SM strategy difficult for competitors to imitate but also increases managerial discretion. When managers use this situation for their own benefit, they can undermine the purported goals of the SM approach. By analyzing some of the factors that might lead to such disfunctionalities, this article advances a theory of the potential dark side of SM.

KW - Causal ambiguity

KW - Corporate governance

KW - Managerial discretion

KW - Stakeholder management

KW - Stakeholder theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959608254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959608254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10551-008-0012-x

DO - 10.1007/s10551-008-0012-x

M3 - Article

VL - 89

SP - 491

EP - 507

JO - Journal of Business Ethics

JF - Journal of Business Ethics

SN - 0167-4544

IS - 4

ER -