Does selection for short sleep duration explain human vulnerability to Alzheimer's disease?

Randolph Nesse, Caleb E. Finch, Charles L. Nunn

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Compared with other primates, humans sleep less and have a much higher prevalence of Alzheimer 's disease (AD) pathology. This article reviews evidence relevant to the hypothesis that natural selection for shorter sleep time in humans has compromised the efficacy of physiological mechanisms that protect against AD during sleep. In particular, the glymphatic system drains interstitial fluid from the brain, removing extra-cellular amyloid beta (eAβ) twice as fast during sleep. In addition, melatonin-a peptide hormone that increases markedly during sleep-is an effective antioxidant that inhibits the polymerization of soluble eAβ into insoluble amyloid fibrils that are associated with AD. Sleep deprivation increases plaque formation and AD, which itself disrupts sleep, potentially creating a positive feedback cycle. These and other physiological benefits of sleep may be compromised by short sleep durations. Our hypothesis highlights possible long-term side effects of medications that reduce sleep, and may lead to potential new strategies for preventing and treating AD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)39-46
Number of pages8
JournalEvolution, Medicine and Public Health
Volume2017
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Amyloid beta
  • Evolution
  • Glymphatic system
  • Melatonin
  • Sleep

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does selection for short sleep duration explain human vulnerability to Alzheimer's disease?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this