Does Political Sophistication Minimize Value Conflict? Evidence from a Heteroskedastic Graded IRT Model of Opinions toward Climate Change

Paul M. Kellstedt, Mark Ramirez, Arnold Vedlitz, Sammy Zahran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

When citizens hold multiple values relevant to their policy opinions, they might experience value conflict, value reconciliation or make a value trade-off. Yet, it is unclear which individuals are able to manage their multiple values in these ways. We posit a sophistication-interaction theory of value pluralism where the most politically sophisticated individuals are able to reconcile the existence of multiple values, thus increasing the stability of their policy opinions. We test this hypothesis using a series of heteroskedastic graded item response theory models of public opinion toward policies related to climate change. We find that people structure their policy preferences toward climate change policies in values toward the environment and the economy, but only the most sophisticated citizens are able to reconcile the potential conflict between these values.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1309-1332
Number of pages24
JournalBritish Journal of Political Science
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2019

Keywords

  • climate change
  • item response theory
  • political sophistication
  • public opinion
  • value conflict

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Does Political Sophistication Minimize Value Conflict? Evidence from a Heteroskedastic Graded IRT Model of Opinions toward Climate Change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this