Does participation affect deception success? A test of the interactivity principle

Judee K. Burgoon, David B. Buller, Kory Floyd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Communication episodes may range from highly interactive to noninteractive. The principle of interactivity refers to the constellation of structural and experiential features associated with interactivity that systematically affect communication processes and outcomes. One such feature is degree of participation. In deceptive interchanges, senders may engage in dialogic (high participation, two-way) or monologic (low participation, one-way) communication. According to the principle of interactivity, dialogue should advantage deceivers relative to monologue due to increased mutuality between sender and receiver and greater opportunities for deceivers to improve their performance over time. An experiment in which friends or strangers alternated between deceiving and telling the truth to a partner under dialogue or monologue conditions tested this principle. All hypotheses received some support. Relative to monologue, dialogue created more mutuality among strangers. Dialogue also enabled deceivers to better manage their informational content, speech fluency, nonverbal demeanor, and image, resulting in less accurate deception detection by partners. These results support the interactivity principle and interpersonal deception theory, from which the principle emanated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)503-534
Number of pages32
JournalHuman Communication Research
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

interactive media
Deception
dialogue
Communication
participation
communication
Interchanges
recipient
experiment
Experiments
performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

Does participation affect deception success? A test of the interactivity principle. / Burgoon, Judee K.; Buller, David B.; Floyd, Kory.

In: Human Communication Research, Vol. 27, No. 4, 10.2001, p. 503-534.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burgoon, Judee K. ; Buller, David B. ; Floyd, Kory. / Does participation affect deception success? A test of the interactivity principle. In: Human Communication Research. 2001 ; Vol. 27, No. 4. pp. 503-534.
@article{010e725b8f574f0cb350802d4db098a2,
title = "Does participation affect deception success? A test of the interactivity principle",
abstract = "Communication episodes may range from highly interactive to noninteractive. The principle of interactivity refers to the constellation of structural and experiential features associated with interactivity that systematically affect communication processes and outcomes. One such feature is degree of participation. In deceptive interchanges, senders may engage in dialogic (high participation, two-way) or monologic (low participation, one-way) communication. According to the principle of interactivity, dialogue should advantage deceivers relative to monologue due to increased mutuality between sender and receiver and greater opportunities for deceivers to improve their performance over time. An experiment in which friends or strangers alternated between deceiving and telling the truth to a partner under dialogue or monologue conditions tested this principle. All hypotheses received some support. Relative to monologue, dialogue created more mutuality among strangers. Dialogue also enabled deceivers to better manage their informational content, speech fluency, nonverbal demeanor, and image, resulting in less accurate deception detection by partners. These results support the interactivity principle and interpersonal deception theory, from which the principle emanated.",
author = "Burgoon, {Judee K.} and Buller, {David B.} and Kory Floyd",
year = "2001",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1093/hcr/27.4.503",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "503--534",
journal = "Human Communication Research",
issn = "0360-3989",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does participation affect deception success? A test of the interactivity principle

AU - Burgoon, Judee K.

AU - Buller, David B.

AU - Floyd, Kory

PY - 2001/10

Y1 - 2001/10

N2 - Communication episodes may range from highly interactive to noninteractive. The principle of interactivity refers to the constellation of structural and experiential features associated with interactivity that systematically affect communication processes and outcomes. One such feature is degree of participation. In deceptive interchanges, senders may engage in dialogic (high participation, two-way) or monologic (low participation, one-way) communication. According to the principle of interactivity, dialogue should advantage deceivers relative to monologue due to increased mutuality between sender and receiver and greater opportunities for deceivers to improve their performance over time. An experiment in which friends or strangers alternated between deceiving and telling the truth to a partner under dialogue or monologue conditions tested this principle. All hypotheses received some support. Relative to monologue, dialogue created more mutuality among strangers. Dialogue also enabled deceivers to better manage their informational content, speech fluency, nonverbal demeanor, and image, resulting in less accurate deception detection by partners. These results support the interactivity principle and interpersonal deception theory, from which the principle emanated.

AB - Communication episodes may range from highly interactive to noninteractive. The principle of interactivity refers to the constellation of structural and experiential features associated with interactivity that systematically affect communication processes and outcomes. One such feature is degree of participation. In deceptive interchanges, senders may engage in dialogic (high participation, two-way) or monologic (low participation, one-way) communication. According to the principle of interactivity, dialogue should advantage deceivers relative to monologue due to increased mutuality between sender and receiver and greater opportunities for deceivers to improve their performance over time. An experiment in which friends or strangers alternated between deceiving and telling the truth to a partner under dialogue or monologue conditions tested this principle. All hypotheses received some support. Relative to monologue, dialogue created more mutuality among strangers. Dialogue also enabled deceivers to better manage their informational content, speech fluency, nonverbal demeanor, and image, resulting in less accurate deception detection by partners. These results support the interactivity principle and interpersonal deception theory, from which the principle emanated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035734803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035734803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/hcr/27.4.503

DO - 10.1093/hcr/27.4.503

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 503

EP - 534

JO - Human Communication Research

JF - Human Communication Research

SN - 0360-3989

IS - 4

ER -