Does distance matter? Access to Family Planning Clinics and adolescent sexual behaviors

Melina Bersamin, Michael Todd, Lillian Remer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The study examines the relationship between adolescent geographic access (distance, travel time, density) to Family Planning Clinics and adolescent sexual behaviors, including sexual initiation, number of partners and condom use. This cross-sectional study, conducted in 2005 in 10 California counties, utilized data from NICHDfunded study on adolescent sexual behavior (n = 921), geospatial coordinates of publicly-funded FPCs, and neighborhood characteristics. A series of regression models were used to assess the relationship between FPC distance, and density (number of FPCs within 1-and 3-mile radii of each adolescent's home), and adolescent sexual behaviors. Significant main effects between access measures of FPC and sexual behavior did not emerge. However, among older youth a significant inverse relationship emerged between number of FPCs within a 1-mile radius and initiating sexual intercourse. While not significant at a = .10, the results also indicate a negative relationship between density of FPCs and sexual partners (b = -.22, p<.15) among older youth. Access to FPCs was not associated with condom use. Conclusions: Results suggest that increased options for family planning services may lead to less risky sexual behaviors among older youth. This finding has significant implications with regards to making family planning resources more readily available to older adolescents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)652-659
Number of pages8
JournalMaternal and Child Health Journal
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Adolescent Behavior
Family Planning Services
Sexual Behavior
Condoms
Sexual Partners
Coitus
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • Adolescence
  • Family planning
  • GIS
  • Sexual behavior

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Does distance matter? Access to Family Planning Clinics and adolescent sexual behaviors. / Bersamin, Melina; Todd, Michael; Remer, Lillian.

In: Maternal and Child Health Journal, Vol. 15, No. 5, 01.07.2011, p. 652-659.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2c32c43294b04baaa394874ea78b6442,
title = "Does distance matter? Access to Family Planning Clinics and adolescent sexual behaviors",
abstract = "The study examines the relationship between adolescent geographic access (distance, travel time, density) to Family Planning Clinics and adolescent sexual behaviors, including sexual initiation, number of partners and condom use. This cross-sectional study, conducted in 2005 in 10 California counties, utilized data from NICHDfunded study on adolescent sexual behavior (n = 921), geospatial coordinates of publicly-funded FPCs, and neighborhood characteristics. A series of regression models were used to assess the relationship between FPC distance, and density (number of FPCs within 1-and 3-mile radii of each adolescent's home), and adolescent sexual behaviors. Significant main effects between access measures of FPC and sexual behavior did not emerge. However, among older youth a significant inverse relationship emerged between number of FPCs within a 1-mile radius and initiating sexual intercourse. While not significant at a = .10, the results also indicate a negative relationship between density of FPCs and sexual partners (b = -.22, p<.15) among older youth. Access to FPCs was not associated with condom use. Conclusions: Results suggest that increased options for family planning services may lead to less risky sexual behaviors among older youth. This finding has significant implications with regards to making family planning resources more readily available to older adolescents.",
keywords = "Adolescence, Family planning, GIS, Sexual behavior",
author = "Melina Bersamin and Michael Todd and Lillian Remer",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10995-010-0618-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "652--659",
journal = "Maternal and Child Health Journal",
issn = "1092-7875",
publisher = "Springer GmbH & Co, Auslieferungs-Gesellschaf",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does distance matter? Access to Family Planning Clinics and adolescent sexual behaviors

AU - Bersamin, Melina

AU - Todd, Michael

AU - Remer, Lillian

PY - 2011/7/1

Y1 - 2011/7/1

N2 - The study examines the relationship between adolescent geographic access (distance, travel time, density) to Family Planning Clinics and adolescent sexual behaviors, including sexual initiation, number of partners and condom use. This cross-sectional study, conducted in 2005 in 10 California counties, utilized data from NICHDfunded study on adolescent sexual behavior (n = 921), geospatial coordinates of publicly-funded FPCs, and neighborhood characteristics. A series of regression models were used to assess the relationship between FPC distance, and density (number of FPCs within 1-and 3-mile radii of each adolescent's home), and adolescent sexual behaviors. Significant main effects between access measures of FPC and sexual behavior did not emerge. However, among older youth a significant inverse relationship emerged between number of FPCs within a 1-mile radius and initiating sexual intercourse. While not significant at a = .10, the results also indicate a negative relationship between density of FPCs and sexual partners (b = -.22, p<.15) among older youth. Access to FPCs was not associated with condom use. Conclusions: Results suggest that increased options for family planning services may lead to less risky sexual behaviors among older youth. This finding has significant implications with regards to making family planning resources more readily available to older adolescents.

AB - The study examines the relationship between adolescent geographic access (distance, travel time, density) to Family Planning Clinics and adolescent sexual behaviors, including sexual initiation, number of partners and condom use. This cross-sectional study, conducted in 2005 in 10 California counties, utilized data from NICHDfunded study on adolescent sexual behavior (n = 921), geospatial coordinates of publicly-funded FPCs, and neighborhood characteristics. A series of regression models were used to assess the relationship between FPC distance, and density (number of FPCs within 1-and 3-mile radii of each adolescent's home), and adolescent sexual behaviors. Significant main effects between access measures of FPC and sexual behavior did not emerge. However, among older youth a significant inverse relationship emerged between number of FPCs within a 1-mile radius and initiating sexual intercourse. While not significant at a = .10, the results also indicate a negative relationship between density of FPCs and sexual partners (b = -.22, p<.15) among older youth. Access to FPCs was not associated with condom use. Conclusions: Results suggest that increased options for family planning services may lead to less risky sexual behaviors among older youth. This finding has significant implications with regards to making family planning resources more readily available to older adolescents.

KW - Adolescence

KW - Family planning

KW - GIS

KW - Sexual behavior

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051677824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051677824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10995-010-0618-3

DO - 10.1007/s10995-010-0618-3

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 652

EP - 659

JO - Maternal and Child Health Journal

JF - Maternal and Child Health Journal

SN - 1092-7875

IS - 5

ER -