TY - JOUR
T1 - Does distance matter? Access to Family Planning Clinics and adolescent sexual behaviors
AU - Bersamin, Melina
AU - Todd, Michael
AU - Remer, Lillian
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by Grant Number R21-HD050347-02 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). The contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent official views of NICHD or NIH.
PY - 2011/7
Y1 - 2011/7
N2 - The study examines the relationship between adolescent geographic access (distance, travel time, density) to Family Planning Clinics and adolescent sexual behaviors, including sexual initiation, number of partners and condom use. This cross-sectional study, conducted in 2005 in 10 California counties, utilized data from NICHDfunded study on adolescent sexual behavior (n = 921), geospatial coordinates of publicly-funded FPCs, and neighborhood characteristics. A series of regression models were used to assess the relationship between FPC distance, and density (number of FPCs within 1-and 3-mile radii of each adolescent's home), and adolescent sexual behaviors. Significant main effects between access measures of FPC and sexual behavior did not emerge. However, among older youth a significant inverse relationship emerged between number of FPCs within a 1-mile radius and initiating sexual intercourse. While not significant at a = .10, the results also indicate a negative relationship between density of FPCs and sexual partners (b = -.22, p<.15) among older youth. Access to FPCs was not associated with condom use. Conclusions: Results suggest that increased options for family planning services may lead to less risky sexual behaviors among older youth. This finding has significant implications with regards to making family planning resources more readily available to older adolescents.
AB - The study examines the relationship between adolescent geographic access (distance, travel time, density) to Family Planning Clinics and adolescent sexual behaviors, including sexual initiation, number of partners and condom use. This cross-sectional study, conducted in 2005 in 10 California counties, utilized data from NICHDfunded study on adolescent sexual behavior (n = 921), geospatial coordinates of publicly-funded FPCs, and neighborhood characteristics. A series of regression models were used to assess the relationship between FPC distance, and density (number of FPCs within 1-and 3-mile radii of each adolescent's home), and adolescent sexual behaviors. Significant main effects between access measures of FPC and sexual behavior did not emerge. However, among older youth a significant inverse relationship emerged between number of FPCs within a 1-mile radius and initiating sexual intercourse. While not significant at a = .10, the results also indicate a negative relationship between density of FPCs and sexual partners (b = -.22, p<.15) among older youth. Access to FPCs was not associated with condom use. Conclusions: Results suggest that increased options for family planning services may lead to less risky sexual behaviors among older youth. This finding has significant implications with regards to making family planning resources more readily available to older adolescents.
KW - Adolescence
KW - Family planning
KW - GIS
KW - Sexual behavior
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051677824&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051677824&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10995-010-0618-3
DO - 10.1007/s10995-010-0618-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 20499146
AN - SCOPUS:80051677824
SN - 1092-7875
VL - 15
SP - 652
EP - 659
JO - Maternal and child health journal
JF - Maternal and child health journal
IS - 5
ER -