Does Criminal Specialization Predict Case Processing?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Theories of sentencing have pointed out the association between the sentence and the courtroom workgroup’s joint assessment of defendants’ risk and culpability. One of the most important indicators of risk and culpability is prior criminal records. Types of crimes and pattern of prior criminal events are an important part of the legal discourse around sentencing. This discussion is conceptually similar to the criminal career concept of criminal specialization. In the present study, latent class analysis (LCA) is used to measure criminal specialization. The cumulative disadvantage perspective is incorporated into the article to model how specialization predicts a series of case processing outcomes—dismissal, charge reduction, incarceration, and length of incarceration. The analysis found specialists of the current crime—robbery defendants who specialized in robbery and larceny defendants who specialized in larceny—generally received less favorable outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCrime and Delinquency
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

specialization
larceny
career concept
Crime
offense
event
discourse
Joints

Keywords

  • case processing
  • criminal specialization
  • latent class analysis
  • sentencing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

Does Criminal Specialization Predict Case Processing? / Yan, Shi.

In: Crime and Delinquency, 01.04.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6eee5cb11e3d435aa8fca7e294606997,
title = "Does Criminal Specialization Predict Case Processing?",
abstract = "Theories of sentencing have pointed out the association between the sentence and the courtroom workgroup’s joint assessment of defendants’ risk and culpability. One of the most important indicators of risk and culpability is prior criminal records. Types of crimes and pattern of prior criminal events are an important part of the legal discourse around sentencing. This discussion is conceptually similar to the criminal career concept of criminal specialization. In the present study, latent class analysis (LCA) is used to measure criminal specialization. The cumulative disadvantage perspective is incorporated into the article to model how specialization predicts a series of case processing outcomes—dismissal, charge reduction, incarceration, and length of incarceration. The analysis found specialists of the current crime—robbery defendants who specialized in robbery and larceny defendants who specialized in larceny—generally received less favorable outcomes.",
keywords = "case processing, criminal specialization, latent class analysis, sentencing",
author = "Shi Yan",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0011128718765123",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Crime and Delinquency",
issn = "0011-1287",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does Criminal Specialization Predict Case Processing?

AU - Yan, Shi

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Theories of sentencing have pointed out the association between the sentence and the courtroom workgroup’s joint assessment of defendants’ risk and culpability. One of the most important indicators of risk and culpability is prior criminal records. Types of crimes and pattern of prior criminal events are an important part of the legal discourse around sentencing. This discussion is conceptually similar to the criminal career concept of criminal specialization. In the present study, latent class analysis (LCA) is used to measure criminal specialization. The cumulative disadvantage perspective is incorporated into the article to model how specialization predicts a series of case processing outcomes—dismissal, charge reduction, incarceration, and length of incarceration. The analysis found specialists of the current crime—robbery defendants who specialized in robbery and larceny defendants who specialized in larceny—generally received less favorable outcomes.

AB - Theories of sentencing have pointed out the association between the sentence and the courtroom workgroup’s joint assessment of defendants’ risk and culpability. One of the most important indicators of risk and culpability is prior criminal records. Types of crimes and pattern of prior criminal events are an important part of the legal discourse around sentencing. This discussion is conceptually similar to the criminal career concept of criminal specialization. In the present study, latent class analysis (LCA) is used to measure criminal specialization. The cumulative disadvantage perspective is incorporated into the article to model how specialization predicts a series of case processing outcomes—dismissal, charge reduction, incarceration, and length of incarceration. The analysis found specialists of the current crime—robbery defendants who specialized in robbery and larceny defendants who specialized in larceny—generally received less favorable outcomes.

KW - case processing

KW - criminal specialization

KW - latent class analysis

KW - sentencing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045144813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045144813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0011128718765123

DO - 10.1177/0011128718765123

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85045144813

JO - Crime and Delinquency

JF - Crime and Delinquency

SN - 0011-1287

ER -