Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits

David Weisburd, Laura A. Wyckoff, Justin Ready, John E. Eck, Joshua C. Hinkle, Frank Gajewski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

266 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent studies point to the potential theoretical and practical benefits of focusing police resources on crime hot spots. However, many scholars have noted that such approaches risk displacing crime or disorder to other places where programs are not in place. Although much attention has been paid to the idea of displacement, methodological problems associated with measuring it have often been overlooked. We try to fill these gaps in measurement and understanding of displacement and the related phenomenon of diffusion of crime control benefits. Our main focus is on immediate spatial displacement or diffusion of crime to areas near the targeted sites of an intervention. Do focused crime prevention efforts at places simply result in a movement of offenders to areas nearby targeted sites- do they simply move crime around the corner"? Or, conversely, will a crime prevention effort focusing on specific places lead to improvement in areas nearby - what has come to be termed a diffusion of crime control benefits? Our data are drawn from a controlled study of displacement and diffusion in Jersey City, New Jersey. Two sites with substantial street-level crime and disorder were targeted and carefully monitored during an experimental period. Two neighboring areas were selected as "catchment areas " from which to assess immediate spatial displacement or diffusion. Intensive police interventions were applied to each target site but not to the catchment areas. More than 6,000 20-minute social observations were conducted in the target and catchment areas. They were supplemented by interviews and ethnographic field observations. Our findings indicate that, at least for crime markets involving drugs and prostitution, crime does not simply move around the comer. Indeed, this study supports the position that the most likely outcome of such focused crime prevention efforts is a diffusion of crime control benefits to nearby areas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)549-591
Number of pages43
JournalCriminology
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Crime
offense
crime prevention
Police
police
prostitution
Sex Work
offender
drug
market
Interviews

Keywords

  • Crime displacement
  • Diffusion of crime control benefits
  • Hot spots policing
  • Police crackdowns
  • Rational choice
  • Routine activities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits. / Weisburd, David; Wyckoff, Laura A.; Ready, Justin; Eck, John E.; Hinkle, Joshua C.; Gajewski, Frank.

In: Criminology, Vol. 44, No. 3, 08.2006, p. 549-591.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weisburd, David ; Wyckoff, Laura A. ; Ready, Justin ; Eck, John E. ; Hinkle, Joshua C. ; Gajewski, Frank. / Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits. In: Criminology. 2006 ; Vol. 44, No. 3. pp. 549-591.
@article{1084de1fbe804e3ba68745c3164b936a,
title = "Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits",
abstract = "Recent studies point to the potential theoretical and practical benefits of focusing police resources on crime hot spots. However, many scholars have noted that such approaches risk displacing crime or disorder to other places where programs are not in place. Although much attention has been paid to the idea of displacement, methodological problems associated with measuring it have often been overlooked. We try to fill these gaps in measurement and understanding of displacement and the related phenomenon of diffusion of crime control benefits. Our main focus is on immediate spatial displacement or diffusion of crime to areas near the targeted sites of an intervention. Do focused crime prevention efforts at places simply result in a movement of offenders to areas nearby targeted sites- do they simply move crime around the corner{"}? Or, conversely, will a crime prevention effort focusing on specific places lead to improvement in areas nearby - what has come to be termed a diffusion of crime control benefits? Our data are drawn from a controlled study of displacement and diffusion in Jersey City, New Jersey. Two sites with substantial street-level crime and disorder were targeted and carefully monitored during an experimental period. Two neighboring areas were selected as {"}catchment areas {"} from which to assess immediate spatial displacement or diffusion. Intensive police interventions were applied to each target site but not to the catchment areas. More than 6,000 20-minute social observations were conducted in the target and catchment areas. They were supplemented by interviews and ethnographic field observations. Our findings indicate that, at least for crime markets involving drugs and prostitution, crime does not simply move around the comer. Indeed, this study supports the position that the most likely outcome of such focused crime prevention efforts is a diffusion of crime control benefits to nearby areas.",
keywords = "Crime displacement, Diffusion of crime control benefits, Hot spots policing, Police crackdowns, Rational choice, Routine activities",
author = "David Weisburd and Wyckoff, {Laura A.} and Justin Ready and Eck, {John E.} and Hinkle, {Joshua C.} and Frank Gajewski",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00057.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "549--591",
journal = "Criminology",
issn = "0011-1384",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits

AU - Weisburd, David

AU - Wyckoff, Laura A.

AU - Ready, Justin

AU - Eck, John E.

AU - Hinkle, Joshua C.

AU - Gajewski, Frank

PY - 2006/8

Y1 - 2006/8

N2 - Recent studies point to the potential theoretical and practical benefits of focusing police resources on crime hot spots. However, many scholars have noted that such approaches risk displacing crime or disorder to other places where programs are not in place. Although much attention has been paid to the idea of displacement, methodological problems associated with measuring it have often been overlooked. We try to fill these gaps in measurement and understanding of displacement and the related phenomenon of diffusion of crime control benefits. Our main focus is on immediate spatial displacement or diffusion of crime to areas near the targeted sites of an intervention. Do focused crime prevention efforts at places simply result in a movement of offenders to areas nearby targeted sites- do they simply move crime around the corner"? Or, conversely, will a crime prevention effort focusing on specific places lead to improvement in areas nearby - what has come to be termed a diffusion of crime control benefits? Our data are drawn from a controlled study of displacement and diffusion in Jersey City, New Jersey. Two sites with substantial street-level crime and disorder were targeted and carefully monitored during an experimental period. Two neighboring areas were selected as "catchment areas " from which to assess immediate spatial displacement or diffusion. Intensive police interventions were applied to each target site but not to the catchment areas. More than 6,000 20-minute social observations were conducted in the target and catchment areas. They were supplemented by interviews and ethnographic field observations. Our findings indicate that, at least for crime markets involving drugs and prostitution, crime does not simply move around the comer. Indeed, this study supports the position that the most likely outcome of such focused crime prevention efforts is a diffusion of crime control benefits to nearby areas.

AB - Recent studies point to the potential theoretical and practical benefits of focusing police resources on crime hot spots. However, many scholars have noted that such approaches risk displacing crime or disorder to other places where programs are not in place. Although much attention has been paid to the idea of displacement, methodological problems associated with measuring it have often been overlooked. We try to fill these gaps in measurement and understanding of displacement and the related phenomenon of diffusion of crime control benefits. Our main focus is on immediate spatial displacement or diffusion of crime to areas near the targeted sites of an intervention. Do focused crime prevention efforts at places simply result in a movement of offenders to areas nearby targeted sites- do they simply move crime around the corner"? Or, conversely, will a crime prevention effort focusing on specific places lead to improvement in areas nearby - what has come to be termed a diffusion of crime control benefits? Our data are drawn from a controlled study of displacement and diffusion in Jersey City, New Jersey. Two sites with substantial street-level crime and disorder were targeted and carefully monitored during an experimental period. Two neighboring areas were selected as "catchment areas " from which to assess immediate spatial displacement or diffusion. Intensive police interventions were applied to each target site but not to the catchment areas. More than 6,000 20-minute social observations were conducted in the target and catchment areas. They were supplemented by interviews and ethnographic field observations. Our findings indicate that, at least for crime markets involving drugs and prostitution, crime does not simply move around the comer. Indeed, this study supports the position that the most likely outcome of such focused crime prevention efforts is a diffusion of crime control benefits to nearby areas.

KW - Crime displacement

KW - Diffusion of crime control benefits

KW - Hot spots policing

KW - Police crackdowns

KW - Rational choice

KW - Routine activities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748335631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748335631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00057.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00057.x

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 549

EP - 591

JO - Criminology

JF - Criminology

SN - 0011-1384

IS - 3

ER -